Claimed OU circuit of Rosemary Ainslie

[Rosemary Ainslie]

What interests me and also what is most relevant, is how my results are different than Glen's.

Please rate my results, or at least explain the metric used to do so. If you can not rate them, I would appreciate an explanation as to why not.

Would a battery supply, isolated scope, and 32mm resistor satisfy the deficient requirements? If I obtained these and tested with them, would you then rate my results Rose? Please identify anything else I have missed, as I will assume that is all if I hear no objections.

.99

Poynty - I'll get back to you here.  I have to go to a gathering of the clans.  The dreaded Sunday meet.  I'll answer this, I promise, before tomorrow.

[MileHigh]

Glen:

The thrust of your argument about .99's results have no logical basis.

You are saying, "Things are different so Poynt's data must be false" without confronting the basic facts that are staring you in the face:  A reasonably accurate replication was done and it fell flat as far as demonstrating over unity goes.  This was done by the most skilled and astute person on this thread who is the most capable and has the right equipment and he has clearly demonstrated his understanding of electronics and energy.  Poynt's results are something you should be trying to understand instead of putting on blinders and running away.

What you are saying simply does not fly.  Watch what happens when I put the burden of explanation on you:

Why should it make a difference between using a battery and a power supply and why should you get better results with the battery?

Your resistor is most likely not as close to the original resistor because Poynt is using a COTS ceramic resistor and Rosemary's original testing was based on a COTS ceramic resistor.  Why should your home-made resistor be any better than Poynt's COTS resistor?  Why should the diameter of the resistor make any difference?  How is the resistor related to the COP performance?

Why should grounding vs. not grounding make a difference?  How does grounding potentially influence the COP of the circuit?

Do you have any answers to these questions besides saying "They're different!?"

Your circuit is also different from the original Ainsley circuit, so what's up with that?  That gives you a built-in FAIL when you don't get COP > 1.  You can say "It's not identical to the original Ainsley setup from 2002."  Then why are you even bothering to do a replication?

These threads always descend into these Monty Python Theater of the Absurd farces when some real data starts rolling in from skilled people that know what they are doing.  Splitting hairs over "identical" and "nearly identical?"  Do you have any cheddar cheese for my dead parrot?

Kiss my ass with respect to the MIB bullshit and the fake two classes of contributors and if you want to see RUDE, look back at your own comments.

I don't believe that you will have anything relevant to say by the time you have finished your "data collection."  Don't worry though you will get an easy out because the thread will almost be dead by then.  Twelve months from now this thread will be gone and the whole thing will have been completely forgotten.

Do you have the "BALLS" to reply?  I don't think so because you already set up your "Escape!  Escape!" modus operandum in your last posting.

Milehigh

[Harvey]

MH,

Are you truly going to hang your hat on Poynt's last results? Is that your final position here? It sounds as though you have already came to some conclusions based on that data. I would never presume to be so hasty with such a small data set, especially when there are two variants included in the second that render it useless. I can't tell if it was the increase in frequency or the increase in duty cycle that gave the high wattage differences. Honestly, I just finished reading the posts here, and was going to politely suggest to poynt to redo the last test by changing only one thing at a time so we could see the results, hopefully in a file sampled each hour over a seven hour period. But you have clearly closed the book on any further testing by Poynt? Was this your intention? We have so much more to do here, I was hoping for his continued input. 

[Hoppy]

Glen:


These threads always descend into these Monty Python Theater of the Absurd farces when some real data starts rolling in from skilled people that know what they are doing.  Splitting hairs over "identical" and "nearly identical?"  Do you have any cheddar cheese for my dead parrot?


I don't believe that you will have anything relevant to say by the time you have finished your "data collection."  Don't worry though you will get an easy out because the thread will almost be dead by then.  Twelve months from now this thread will be gone and the whole thing will have been completely forgotten.

Milehigh

Now that this thread is winding-up, here is a classic bit of humour: -

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=78b67l_yxUc&feature=SeriesPlayList&p=CA0C205FE6CE14B4

I would like to thank Rosemary for making this thread one of the most interesting and enjoyable I have so far locked into.

Further serious input to this thread is a waste of time and effort.

Let the bun fight continue and enjoy the video.

Hoppy

[powercat]

Rosie it's been great to have you here and I hope you will stick around,
the forum needs all the help it can get to discover OU
BTW don't forget your password
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BOJrmTF3TCs&feature=related
cat