Claimed OU circuit of Rosemary Ainslie

[WilbyInebriated]

Because you use name calling as a distraction to make up for your lack of knowledge & expertise. You still have not answered the technical question, yet you carry on & on with childish questions. By all means, continue on with your pointless handwaving ambiguous chit chat. I'm only interested in a technical discussion about the measurements.

So far only .99 has done correct measurements, to my surprise, even though he did not complete them, yet. My hats off to .99!

what name calling are you referring to? i suppose you think the tick analogy is name calling...
what argument was i distracting ramset, hoppy or poynt from with those quotes? can you show that? no you can't. ergo there was no ad hominem from me...
furthermore, i can call anyone any name i choose and as long as i am not rejecting their argument it IS NOT an ad hominem. i gave you the definiton TWICE and yet you still cannot comprehend it. no surprise i guess, since you have demonstrated you don't know the difference between a question, a statement and a claim...
look pauly come lately, here is a simple way for you understand it.
fill in the person A's name, fill in the claim person A made where the X is. fill in the person B. show where person B asserts that claim X is false.
   1. Person A makes claim X.
   2. Person B makes an attack on person A.
   3. Therefore A's claim is false.
THAT is what an ad hominem is, ERGO i commited no ad hominem. you should however look to your own posts.
i did answer your question several times now... so three pages of asinine evasions from you is your interest in discussing the measurements? LOL

which measurements by poynt were the correct ones? can you clarify?

you keep using that word ambiguous incorrectly, i have not been ambiguous at all, point in fact i have addressed most, if not all of your posts point by point.

[poynt99]

My how this thread has digressed 

Rose, thanks for the nice drawing

Brought a smile to my face 

Not sure I look that good in a dress and high-heels though 

.99

[poynt99]

So far only .99 has done correct measurements, to my surprise, even though he did not complete them, yet. My hats off to .99!

I may take some time in the next few days to complete the MOSFET dissipation test with a control, for what it may be worth.

.99

[PaulLowrance]

I may take some time in the next few days to complete the MOSFET dissipation test with a control, for what it may be worth.

.99

The results will be interesting. It's hard to believe that the scope calculations will be off by that much, but my prediction is that the mosfet temperature measurements will be less than 10 watts. If it's over say 13 watts, then I'll be interested in replicating it.

BTW, my advice is to place the thermistor as far away from the mosfet as possible, somewhere near the top of the heat sink.

Paul

[PaulLowrance]

Correct me if I'm wrong, but after looking it up again, the mosfet produced 44.27 watts according to your scope calculations. If the temperature measurements show ~ 9 watts, then that's a massive error.

Paul