Claimed OU circuit of Rosemary Ainslie

[IceStorm]

she said that long after you used the incorrect fet. substituting what you have on hand while attempting a 'replication' is not good scientific method, even if it turns out later that the part may be acceptable. why do you have such trouble understanding that? nice try at the misdirection though.

I hope you do understand that there a world between "1 part not identical" and "Circuit not doing what it should be". Personaly if i was not getting the effect Rosemary was claiming with all the circuit working, i will think that maybe the fet make realy a big difference, but when the circuit dosent work at all like it should be from start... i hope you do understand that the FET part make no difference at all.

Best Regards,
IceStorm

[TinselKoala]

she said that long after you used the incorrect fet. substituting what you have on hand while attempting a 'replication' is not good scientific method, even if it turns out later that the part may be acceptable. why do you have such trouble understanding that? nice try at the misdirection though.

No, she actually said it long before--years ago. I suppose you will read the material, eventually. And I'll put my scientific method up against yours, any day of the week.

Done much classroom teaching at the university level? Got any credentials from universities? Got a job in a scientific field? Got any publications in major peer-reviewed scientific journals? Good, I'm glad. Because I have, and I do, too. I still get about a dozen reprint requests a month, and it's been nearly ten years since that particular paper was published.

Nice straw man, though.

Now, will you ffs change your tape?

[WilbyInebriated]

I hope you do understand that there a world between "1 part not identical" and "Circuit not doing what it should be". Personaly if i was not getting the effect Rosemary was claiming with all the circuit working, i will think that maybe the fet make realy a big difference, but when the circuit dosent work at all like it should be from start... i hope you do understand that the FET part make no difference at all.

Best Regards,
IceStorm

have you read my posts re: the fet where i said i agree with him? (mostly)

[WilbyInebriated]

No, she actually said it long before--years ago. I suppose you will read the material, eventually. And I'll put my scientific method up against yours, any day of the week.

Done much classroom teaching at the university level? Got any credentials from universities? Got a job in a scientific field? Got any publications in major peer-reviewed scientific journals? Good, I'm glad. Because I have, and I do, too. I still get about a dozen reprint requests a month, and it's been nearly ten years since that particular paper was published.

Nice straw man, though.

Now, will you ffs change your tape?

you didn't know that at the time. nice misdirection though. the point remains, you used a circuit diagram which specified a irfpg50 among other components and you substituted whatever you felt like. and then proceeded to use words like identical and exact and then compared your hack to good scientific method. that's what i have always had an issue with, 30 pages running now.

as i said before, i don't care what you did on who. it's irrelevant.

[TinselKoala]

If you fkn agree, mostly, and if I have long ago conceded your point, then why in the world do you keep on harping on it?
It's getting to be quite ridiculous. You seem fairly intelligent for a troll, and it might be nice to actually discuss something substantive with you, if only you would change your meds or something.

Oh, I get it--you are a paid lackey of the Free Energy Gurus In White, and you are keeping me uselessly distracted on this thread, answering your inanities, while everybody else is happily developing their gravitymagnoSECgenerator, without skeptical interference.