Claimed OU circuit of Rosemary Ainslie

[TinselKoala]

Sigh. OK.
I have made Yet Another Video, showing that jibbguy's conjecture about the triggering was not quite right. I have made bands that look like Aaron's using Aaron's circuit, using the Tek scope in an "unusual" mode, very likely how Aaron was using his.
The reason Jibbguy may not have seen this in his long years of experience is because, well, he might be sane, and no sane person would use a scope this way.
(EDIT: I'm having some trouble with this vid. Might not get it tonight. Sorry.)

[TinselKoala]

"Aaron - just for the record. My neighbour is now also blind to OU.COM. Guess that's the last hope for the immediate future.
Puts paid to any accidental disconection. And TK is apparently on record as requiring this. Can I ask that someone on that forum look into it? TK has gone on record as preferring the disconnect. I'd be very grateful."

Another lie from Rosemary. I have never "gone on record preferring the disconnect." Several people who are contrary to her opinions have been banned from even reading "her" forum thread, though, for simply speaking the truth.

I want to make something perfectly clear: I do not moderate this thread, nor would I if I could. I have nothing to do with the running of this forum. Stefan has threatened to ban me several times over other matters--matters in which time has proven me to have been right all along. That is neither here nor there.

I have nothing whatsoever to do with Rosemary's access, or lack of it, to this forum.

Rosemary's last few posts are also rife with misrepresentations and distortions, and even more lies.

One should never delegate understanding, Rosemary. You have let others "understand" things that you yourself do not--like my position, who my "controllers" are, and so forth. You are making terrible mistakes, and your ego just won't let you see it.

If you want to read here, you will see lots of things like this:

The most telling of all is that it has been nearly six weeks now, with people all over the world building variations of your little mosfet amplifier, and nobody has shown excess heat AT ALL, much less 17 times. And get off the battery charge claim--your paper and article are talking about excess heat energy. The battery recharge is a separate claim.

Where is the excess heat?

It is not showing up.

And where is your circuit? It's not showing up.
And where is...all the other supporting stuff that we expect from ANY claimant...except for some reason, you--the endorsements, the reports from the labs...not showing up.
The corrected circuit diagram. Not showing up.
The scope shots from your circuit, that you still have in your possession. Not showing up.

Let's review: What have we seen from Rosemary? A patent application, a Quantum magazine article, a "EIT.pdf" paper, published nowhere. And a lot of words, insults, and disrespect.

What else? Nothing. Not even a photograph, a scope shot, a page of raw data, an eyewitness...NOTHING.

And many of the claims in the two papers have been shown to be wrong. Duty cycle, 555 timer, diode vs. no diode, heat vs. battery recharging, heat output at 3.7 percent ON, random aperiodic resonant oscillations with a period of 3.7 percent, the energy balance calculations...every claim of hers that has actually been examined is WRONG.

But she will squeal and cry and make up things without proof to try to discredit those who have actually worked hard to see what's going on. It makes me very angry, and her last series of posts underscores the whole affair. We are dealing with a paranoid, extremely manipulative personality, and I'm not just talking about me.

[TinselKoala]

The Clarke Hess is a "fancy ammeter."
That is the kind of willful ignorance that really makes me angry.

Calorimeter testing of a Clarke-Hess power meter:
http://www.earthtech.org/experiments/sono/chtest3.html (a model 2330)

From the Clarke-Hess 2335 brochure:

TRUE RMS/REALLY BROADBAND
The Model 2335 Sampling Watt Meter is a precision, high accuracy, auto-ranging  instrument which simultaneously measures and displays true rms Voltage, true rms Current and true mean Power over a frequency range from dc to more than 1MHz. Full scale Current and Voltage inputs are typically measured within ±0.1% of the reading in amplitude to at least 500kHz. The corresponding Power is typically measured to within ±0.1% of the input Volt-Amperes to 250kHz and to within ±0.2% of the input Volt-Amperes to 500kHz for loads having any Power Factor.

LOW POWER FACTOR ACCURACY.
Five digits or resolution combined with excellent phase matching between the current and voltage channels make the Model 2335 watt meter an exceptionally good instrument for making low power factor measurements up to 1MHz.  This makes the instrument ideal for high frequency core loss measurements which are inherently low power factor.

MULTI-FUNCTION
In addition to the rms Voltage, rms Current, and mean square Power the Model 2335 watt meter also  measures simultaneously the peak Voltage, the peak Current and the Frequency and calculates the Volt-Ampere product, the Power Factor and the Harmonics of the current and the voltage. These functions may be displayed or may be read over the IEEE-488.2 or RS-232 interfaces.

UNPARALLELED HIGH FREQUENCY ACCURACY
The Model 2335 watt meter allows broadband and high accuracy measurements of both sinusoidal and highly distorted wave shapes. The Current, Voltage, Power, and Power Factor accuracies to 1MHz of the Model 2335 watt meter far exceed any other sampling Watt Meter, or for that matter, with respect to Current or Voltage, almost all conventional multimeters.

Full scale Power ranges exist for loads with impedances from (0.6V/1.5A) = 0.4W to (600V/1.5mA) = 400kW.

WIDE MEASUREMENT RANGE
The Model 2335 watt meter has full scale Power ranges from 1.0000mWatt to 10000Watts. With external shunts or current to voltage transducers the upper range may be extended by a factor of ten or one hundred. Full scale Voltage from 2.000V to 2000V (usable to 1000V) and full scale Current ranges from 5.000mA to 5.000A (all rms values) cover a wide range of load impedances. Full scale Current and Voltage inputs may have crest factors up to three while smaller inputs may have even higher crest factors. Sinusoidal inputs with rms values of twice the nominal Full Scale value may be measured with no loss in accuracy.

POSSIBLE MEASUREMENT USES
Measurement of Ultrasonic Equipment of all types and power levels, Finished Transformers, Transformer Core Material, Switching Power Supplies, Fluorescent Lamp Ballasts of all types, Mercury Arc Lamp Circuits, Sodium Lamp Ballasts, Speed Controlled Motors of all types, Efficiency of any device with an electrical input and an electrical output, SCR Controlled Devices of all types, High Frequency and/or Distorted Currents from any source, Voltage Response of any device from DC to 1MHz, and the Characteristics of Electric Automobile Drives.

EASY TO CALIBRATE AND MAINTAIN
The Model 2335 watt meter is an all solid state instrument with optically isolated input channels.   DC coupling in both channels allows calibration and/or verification with high accuracy dc sources. Internal software calibration routines allow most recalibrations to be accomplished without opening the instrument and without screwdriver adjustments.

UNIQUE SAMPLING APPROACH / ISOLATED INPUTS
The Voltage and Current inputs of the Model 2335 watt meter are simultaneously sampled (with 16 bit resolution), converted to digital form, and transmitted via optical links to the main chassis. This allows both the Current and Voltage inputs to be completely isolated from each other and from the main chassis. The asynchronous sampling frequency is controlled by the system microprocessor in such a fashion that neither it nor any of its harmonics can come close to the measured input frequency or any of its harmonics. This precaution prevents "beats" with their accompanying jitter in the displayed values.

REMOTE  CONTROL
The Model 2335 watt meter is equipped with an IEEE-488.2 interface and an RS-232 interface which both incorporate all of the IEEE-488.2 Common Commands and Queries. Any function that can be entered via the front panel can be controlled via either interface. In addition, any or all of the functions which can be displayed, can be queried and sent simultaneously to the Controller over the either interface. The status (e.g. Current range, Voltage range, etc) of the instrument may also be queried and sent over either interface..

The bus address for the IEEE-488 interface is set from the front panel and is displayed both at turn-on and when the Local key is depressed. A Remote lamp indicates that the Model 2335 watt meter has been placed in its Remote state by the IEEE-488 Controller.

[ramset]

All canadian
@Ramset
Quote:
Aaron is using a much higher driving freq from his 555, and a long duty cycle of 50 percent or more. This, plus the high inductance of that load, results in the inductive ring being a substantial portion of the pulse duration, not just a little spike like at 2.4 kHz drive.
So now, you just turn the gate drive down (increase the resistance of that pot) until the scope's trigger is being shown the garbage in the very first little piece of the ringdown. And since the trigger circuit is not so good, or it's set on the wrong coupling, or just because it is a 2-trace scope in "vertical mode" trigger, it can't keep up and the waveform slips past in the time dimension. You can see from the contrast bands that the waveform is nearly the same when it's slipping as when it's caught. Plus, since the mosfet isn't turning fully on before you turn it off and start the ringing, the current draw goes down and the batt voltage goes up.
Now turn the gate up or the duty cycle longer. The mosfet turns on fully so the current goes up and the batt voltage goes down. And the scope's trigger sees a cleaner rising portion of the wave and locks it in.

This is a lot easier to do on the other scopes. My Philips has rock-solid triggering and no beam chopper stuff to get in the way of the trigger. But I was able to fool the Philips, even at the low 2.4 kHz used by Ainslie, and me (but not Aaron.)

Aaron, Steve ,All, please comment
Thanks for the link to TK's video, I always get a real kick out of them,LOL. Fortunately I do not use the triggered sweep function on my scope and I perform secondary measurements with a good quality frequency meter used to calibrate ham radio equipment. So you and others may want to rethink this "false trigger" theory and consider other options as to why you cannot produce the secondary oscillations.
Regards
AC

[TinselKoala]

Well, I have considered one other alternative. The 555 timer that Aaron is using might be making the oscillations, rather than the mosfet. I will have to make one like his, or he will have to make one like Rosemary's (which mine is from--the Quantum paper, remember?)
I have tried the entire range of my FG and can't make the circuits, Ainslie's or Aaron's,  do anything but lose trigger. And ditto with my 555 timer at its freq range.
I've seen 555s do this kind of thing many times, especially if they are a bit flakey. There can be wide variations between individual 555 chips. They get hot, they respond to spikes...I don't see any decoupling caps...

Can a FG be used to make the circuit behave that way, if it's not a trigger issue? Anyone?

That old Interstate (not wavetek!) that I use does not have the most square pulses in the world, but it usually is better than a 555 at a given freq.