Claimed OU circuit of Rosemary Ainslie

[ramset]

not that i saw ,
just someone trying to stear the thread back to experiments

[BEP]

"stuff that archeologists politely refer to as copralites"

Hmmmm....

Do you think she meant coprolites? This person sounds like my mother in-law. In the same sentence she'll tell you how funny you are and call you fossilized crap.

At least fossilized crap withstands the test of time 

[poynt99]

@BEP
ROFL

.99

[spinner]

Hi!
Reading a few pages of this thread... I wander.. What is so special about this claim?
In the era of "DMM" measurements, anything is possible!

Looking at the schematics, it's just an electronic circuit made of a very well known electronic components.
Which, btw, never were and probably never will be related with any kind of OU.
Although the "mission" is noble, the results are - sadly, predictable..

Nothing extraordinaire, especially if one observes it through the energy balance glasses.

So, why all the fuzz about it?
How come that this thread has so many pages?

Proving an OU claim is really not that difficult, especially with electronic circuits.

Known conditions - energy input and the (more or less) valid output measurements.
With a "COP" of 17, even a human "sensors" should be enough to feel the "UAU!" difference....

Ah, nevermind.
I'm sure this setup is like all (or most) of the others, where output (or input, or both) were measured wrongly.
Another "measurement Error". Sorry.

[TinselKoala]

What's the matter with you, Spinner? Don't you know that you are criticizing the work of the greatest unsung theorist of physics since...well, since PeeWee Herman?
The person who has performed the definitive demonstration that proves free energy heat and battery recharging?
Which has been confirmed many times and long ago by her minion Murakami, who, I understand, will be receiving the Nobel Prize for inventing the self-recharging battery.
We are in the presence of real genius here and should be more respectful. After all, it's only been seven years. These things take time, we don't want, for example, hybrid auto manufacturers to get too far ahead of things by using this simple mosfet technology to extend range or improve payload capacity.
Nor would we want to see the shameful spectacle of an old lady huddled over a bunch of power resistors and some golf cart batteries, trying to keep warm in some strange inverted Australian winter. So we have to wait, until mainstream science drops their obsession with that ridiculous QED nonsense and adopts Zipon Antitruant theory and starts making commercial heaters using the Ainslie circuit.

I suppose this is a good place to announce:

I've Done IT! Since Aaron has demonstrated that all you need for free energy is to show an increase in battery voltage, I CLAIM THE OU PRIZE.

The battery I used to make the heat tests yesterday, 2 x 12 v 20 mA-H sealed lead-acids, was down to 25.0 volts at the completion of testing.
And it's been sitting on my Free Energy Workbench, not connected to anything, but in the presence of the Lord.

This morning, the battery is at 25.2 volts. That's 200 miliVolts increase!!
200 mV x 25 volts, why, that's 5 Watts!!! Overnight!! Do you realize what an incredible amount of free energy that is? Let's see, 5 watts times 8 hours, that's 5 x 8 x 60 x 60, that's 144,000 Joules. For Nothing, from Nowhere! No, wait, it must be from the Zero Point. See, I can show you this blur on my oscilloscope....that's the Zero Point energy doing that.

So, since all I did was wait, I have a COP of...let's see....divide by zero...er....ummm....Can anyone help me? I wasn't in class the day they covered dividing by zero...but I know the COP of my system is huge, so huge that I will inevitably be ignored and suppressed by Big Oil and Academia.

Wait a minute...that's also the number of souls who will be Raptured to heaven at the second coming of Christ.

Do you see? That proves it beyond any doubt. Free Energy, the Rapture, it's all connected.

Grok the Fullness!

(Next you'll be telling me I don't know how to calculate power or energy. Well, isn't 0.2 x 25 equal to 5? Of course it is.  If I use different numbers, I'll get a different answer. There wasn't any current, obviously, so I can't use that. But the duty cycle was infinitely short, so that makes up for it. That's why I used the voltage twice, because V=IR and there isn't any I.
And since R is infinite in an open circuit, the energy just comes from the volts. Everyone who follows Murakami's work knows that you can get energy from volts.)