Claimed OU circuit of Rosemary Ainslie

[allcanadian]

@spinner
Quote:
"In fact, it is well "underunity"- it's just a common, or, better,  quite useless electronic circuit. It actually doesn't have a real purpose... (except to feed all the amateur trolls at this very moment)..."

It seems almost every word you type is a contradiction to actual fact, the circuit is not useless it has been proven to generate heat, that is the "real" purpose you stated doesn't exist, LOL. As for the simple, common or otherwise circuit components, do you know how many people have won a nobel prize for simply describing the interactions in and around a simple coiled piece of wire which in fact represets an air core inductance? If it is so common or better quite useless I wonder why all these people were awarded a nobel prize for their understanding of it?. As well there are those fools from MIT playing with simple coils of wire and transmitting electrical power, which Intel just paid millions of dollars to for stock options, maybe you can explain to them how common or useless their simple components are. Are these now very rich person's from MIT troll's as well? You see what you and your merry gang of critics understand of basic electronics is not even a start in regards to what you need to know and understand in order to succeed and blaming others for your ignorance will not help matters. You are never going to succeed by measuring what is happening in the circuit proper, you have to understand the field interactions exterior to it and how they relate to one another and the circuit.
Regards
AC

[TinselKoala]

Yes, let's not forget the circuit "generates heat."
Picture the image of a grandmotherly old woman in a rocker, huddled over an Ainslie heater in the cold South African August winter, while contemplating this graph:

[allcanadian]

@TK
That is an interesting graph but of course it does not show the heat dissipated in the mosfet of the Ainslie circuit in which case the graphs would be nearly identical because as we all know energy is conserved. We also know the circuit generates heat, it is simply a matter of how much relative to the input and where it is generated in the circuit. In essence if one wanted to judge the graph as depicted it would represent a violation of the conservation of energy because you cannot get any less energy out than you put in for the same reason you cannot get more energy out than you put in, within a closed system. When you find out how one would make this closed system an open one then you will have the answers your looking for.
Regards
AC

[qiman]

From Rosemary:

"You're right. I have various neighbours who've sorted out an intermittent access. But it does not enable registration.

Come on TK. You've got a monologue going there - a really long winded one sided argument. And I can't accuse you of impartiality, moderation, fair mindedness, objectivity, or accurate data presentation. And if you look at our posts you'll see Aaron's got a cogent argument as to why we need you to use that Fluke. I'd like to advance that other face of the argument that you persistently refuse to address."

[poynt99]

@TK
That is an interesting graph but of course it does not show the heat dissipated in the mosfet of the Ainslie circuit in which case the graphs would be nearly identical because as we all know energy is conserved. We also know the circuit generates heat, it is simply a matter of how much relative to the input and where it is generated in the circuit. In essence if one wanted to judge the graph as depicted it would represent a violation of the conservation of energy because you cannot get any less energy out than you put in for the same reason you cannot get more energy out than you put in, within a closed system. When you find out how one would make this closed system an open one then you will have the answers your looking for.
Regards
AC

All TK would have to do for the control DC case to make it completely fair, is to place the MOSFET, diode, and shunt in series with the load resistor/coil and fix-bias the gate so the MOSFET is fully ON.

But then I wouldn't be surprised if TK already did it this way.

.99