Claimed OU circuit of Rosemary Ainslie

[ramset]

OOpppss....
Thanks Groundloop
Sorry Mr Roksund
Chet

[WilbyInebriated]

Build the circuit as shown in the Quantum paper. Look at the duty cycle produced by the timer portion.
Then, tell me who has made the ee101 mistake.

Then, once you've done that, tell me logically why I should bother to do any more testing, since the ORIGINAL Ainslie circuit produces the WRONG duty cycle.

And while you're at it, tell me why Stiffler has made ee101 mistakes in every post he's made over there.

so i take it that is a no then. you still don't have the "exact" fet.

rosemarie did. then you did also.

as i said before, i agree with you about the duty cycle (only because you failed to get the fet into self oscillation...) and i don't care what you do on who, just don't tell me it's "exact", or you replicated it "exactly" here or on any other forum until it is "exact".

why are you bringing stiffler into it? did he help you pick out the wrong fet? did he put the words "exact" or "exactly" in your posts? misdirection and ad hominem...

[ramset]

Wilbynice?
Or Wilby Not nice?
TK was just getting there attention[seems pretty hard to do!!]
Can anything be exact ?
What I would like to know is, why so much off time?
Why so many hours to accumulate the "EFFECT'

Chet
PS
and Stiffler threw some low blows [made fun of the penguin[mascot]

[WilbyInebriated]

Wilbynice?
Or Wilby Not nice?
TK was just getting there attention[seems pretty hard to do!!]
Can anything be exact ?
What I would like to know is, why so much off time?
Why so many hours to accumulate the "EFFECT'

Chet
PS
and Stiffler threw some low blows [made fun of the penguin[mascot]

i dont care what stiffler did or didn't do, it's irrelevant.
no, nothing can be exact. obviously semiconductor components have a inherent variation even from the same batch, but for the love of zeus get the right fet before one calls it "exact". i should hope you can see this self evident truth and not have issue with that.
i asked TK a simple question at the beginning of this thread and all he has done is beat around the bush. if it's not exact don't use the word exact... and furthermore, if it's not exact don't be a pompous ass while using the word exact and expect not to get called on it, especially after someone asked you on page 1 of the thread if you planned on doing it "exactly".

PS i think TK does great work, he just never quite does it exactly
PPS i agree with stiffler, stuffed animals are for children...

[WilbyInebriated]

it's not TK's madness that i have issue with, it's his method.

if TK is not willing to retract/correct his erroneous statement about his circuit being "exact" why should rosemary retract/correct her paper?