Claimed OU circuit of Rosemary Ainslie

[ramset]

99
Rosemary has some fellow Donavon [I think] that is her "expert"
He's supposed to be showing up to help out

Chet

[TinselKoala]

@99: Thank you so much for doing that. I was afraid for a while that I was going nutzo. Not that that would be bad, necessarily...

Do you mind if I post a link over there to this post, so those with eyes to see can take a look?

(Now, she is presuming to teach me how to use and read an oscilloscope...       )

EDIT: I really don't like the "tone" she is taking with me. This is starting to get a bit personal, and I will be happy to pull out the "big guns" of accurate calorimetry to blow her out of the water. There's the matter of the patent applications...which in her mind seem to have the status of "patents"...and the supposed confirmations by independent labs, which turn out to be no such thing....and of course the Quantum circuit, which simply turns the mosfet ON and heats the load through simple Joule heating from the current conduction...

I suppose arrogance is a necessary concomitant of prevarication and mendacity, if one wants to enhance seeming credibility among the credulous. But it's the arrogant liers that are the worst, because they will never never admit that they are wrong and have been shovelling you a line of bs.

[poynt99]

@99: Thank you so much for doing that. I was afraid for a while that I was going nutzo. Not that that would be bad, necessarily...

Do you mind if I post a link over there to this post, so those with eyes to see can take a look?

Sure. I don't mind.

What might have caught them: If you look at the MOSFET Drain with the scope referenced to ground, the wave form will look like a 3.7% duty cycle. But in reality it looks that way because the MOSFET is pulling the coil down to ground, 96% of the time. After all, the MOSFET is connected as an INVERTER 

.99

[TinselKoala]

Sure. I don't mind.

What might have caught them: If you look at the MOSFET Drain with the scope referenced to ground, the wave form will look like a 3.7% duty cycle. But in reality it looks that way because the MOSFET is pulling the coil down to ground, 96% of the time. After all, the MOSFET is connected as an INVERTER 

.99

Thanks.
Yep, as I explained in one of the videos, when the voltage at her monitoring point "A" goes HIGH (to battery voltage positive rail) , that means the MOSFET is OFF. And her circuit turns the mosfet OFF in the range of about 1 to 10 percent of the time. It cannot be adjusted to turn the MOSFET ON for a short duty cycle, with the component values given, as you've confirmed.

Again, I really appreciate your taking a look at this. I posted a link, but I'm pretty sure it won't do any good.

I would like to get on with testing the main OU claim. My results so far, using a 3.7 percent duty cycle and tuning the gate drive for maximum ringdown weirdness (where the battery-monitoring voltmeter goes crazy from the spikes returning on the input), I get heating of the load that seems similar to what is reported in the Quantum article and the paper. So my main beef is with the published diagram, not the data itself.  It seems that a true 3.7 percent duty cycle can heat the load, with a similar profile to what Ainslie claimed.
BUT--my control experiment, which used the very same load resistor-inductor, and a DC current-limited source supplying the same average power as was given to the load in the experimental condition (about 1.1 watts, in line with Ainslie's number)--the control experiment causes almost exactly the same heating. So I am not detecting anything like COP>17. Not even COP>1, at this point. But the mosfet gets pretty warm too, and after all, I still don't have the IRFPG50 to play with.

[Cloxxki]

There seemed to be another feature to her circuit.
Was it not mentioned that the batteries lasted a long time, considering the amount of heat produced?
I'm a newbie, but I suppose with a 3.7% duty cycle, your batteries are supposed to last a while? Yet, if the inverted duty cycle is the actual case, how long could her batteries be expected last?