Claimed OU circuit of Rosemary Ainslie

[0c]

You mean, like Northern vs. Southern Hemisphere?

I mean like look at the animation at the top of the first link. See that sawtooth waveform on the upper left?

Actually it looks like whoever designed Rosemary's 555 didn't know about these (standard) circuits, because I don't see any diodes in these, and there also are more capacitors in her 555 circuit.

In the first link, look at the "Duty Cycle <50%" diagram. There's a diode there.

[TinselKoala]

jibbguy, you made so strong point about the strong point that I am affraid that now we have to wait untill the FULL JURY makes the deliberation, and not just the self-appointed Supreme Judges. Is there some critical time factor here that we are missing, that it is so important to rush to judgment? If so please let us know

Hi Henieck
It makes no difference what a "supreme jury" does or does not report. You will be greatly amused by the Mylow saga, if you haven't already read it. And of course, there is Steorn and their professional jurors--whose verdict was announced a few weeks ago--that jury gave a negative report, but Steorn won't accept it...
For example, even after Mylow was caught red-handed so to speak, and even had admitted faking some of his motors, some people still believed that other of his motors "worked" actually.
So I expect people to be trying to "replicate" Rosemary's reported results for years to come, no matter what any "jury" might say.

But no matter what any Jury might say, I doubt if we'll be seeing any actual home heaters or actual battery chargers using this circuit. Ever.

[TinselKoala]

I mean like look at the animation at the top of the first link. See that sawtooth waveform on the upper left?

In the first link, look at the "Duty Cycle <50%" diagram. There's a diode there.

OK, thanks, I see it now. The ramp waveform isn't the output of the circuit, it's showing the relation between that cap charging and the square output pulse.
The diode, now...I'll get back to you on that.  Got to run right now

Oh, and I decided to use the LeCroy scope instead of the Hitachi--the Hitachi does not do integration on board, but the LeCroy does.

[ramset]

 Joit  said
poynt99
I did my shot at the Output (Pin3) from the Timer.
Its an ST NE555N
I did not connect it now to the Base of any Transistor, for that, i play extra around.
This 'Line' what you see, is the laying Triangle, looks more like it generates a Sawtooth Wave. But you can turn it down or up.
With the 100Ohm Potentiometer at the Base of the Transistor you should can set the Duty Cycle.
You are using 3 Pots at all?
I will try to make a Video, and see, what i else can do with it.
__________________
Theorizer are like High Voltage. A lot hot Air with no Power behind but they are the dead of applied Work and Ideas.

[NerzhDishual]

Hi Guys,

Just my 2cents.
I have beadboarded the Quantum's paper 555 timer CirCuiT.

It works fine. I can read (at pin 3) the less than 4% duty cycle with
a freq. of  2.4 khz. Of course, I have to swap the probes of my scope
(and the probes of my freq meter) to see these results....

I mean: IMHO - and if I'm not mistaken - the Quantum 555 CCT
does *not* give the claimed results but just the opposite
as initially stated by NikolaTesla mingled (TK)....
My 555 circuit also  "generates (at pin 3) long, not short, ON times".

Now, some guys are telling that the Quantum 555 CCT actually works as claimed =
generates short not long ON times (at pin 3? with the probes correctly wired?)
I'm lost.... I guess I will have another drink.

Anyway, an extra 2N2222 (or similar) at pin 3 should inverse the wave.
Should it not?

BTW I have ordered some  IRFPG50.
http://www.awatronic.fr/index.php?_a=viewProd&productId=20219&added=1

Now, What about this circuit???  Sounds familiar. No?
Are the maths right?
More, In French (sorry) on : http://freenrg.info/Misc/FR_Zoltan_ZPE_Circuit/

Very Best