Claimed OU circuit of Rosemary Ainslie

[MileHigh]

Rosemary:

I am already "on record" that I would admit a gain if there was one but by the same token I stated that I am 100% certain that there will not be any gain.

I think there's a difference in the resistors being tested.

Be very careful here Rosemary because you are entering Bedini/Bearden/Newman territory here.  As you know the inductive resistor has properties of resistance, inductance, and a minuscule stray capacitance.  You have learnt enough by now to know that changing the resistance or inductance paramaters slightly will only change the timing characteristics of the circuit slightly, and nothing more than that.  There is no logical reason for a specific South-African-manufactured inductive resistor to have some "unique" characteristic such that only this specific combination of resistance and inductace will give you the results that you are looking for.  That is truly clutching at straws and is the same argument that John Bedini, Tom Bearden, Joe Newman and others of their ilk use when nobody can replicate the results shown in the "Energy from the Vacuum" DVD series.

For example, there is a "Kromrey Converter" thread on the EF and nobody can get the results shown in the EFTV DVD #10 and the argument is that the builders are not building "exact" replications.  It is all very offensive to me, since I believe that the DVD is faked (I stress that I haven't seen it) and it is just an excuse to keep the "believers" spending money on a regular basis buying up more and more DVDs in the series as they come out.  It hurts me to see decent good people get suckered into spending hundreds of dollars or more to replicate Bedini's Funky Alternator when it is all a waste of time for something that will never work.  The whole point of the DVD is to make cash selling it and nothing more.  John and his buddies couldn't care less about the time and expense the "suckers" are incurring because of the DVD.  The "Kromrey Converter" pitch could easily be ripped to shreds.  As far as I am concerned it's all a lost battle anyways, John Bedini is a rock star as far as the believers think and can do no wrong.  In the beginning of the thread there is a link to a 1984 document put together by Bedini and Bearden about the "Kromrey Converter."  It's only about 15 pages long and technically it is such complete junk as to make me puke, and it's credibility is questioned by none of the believers, they just read it and believe it.  Finally, good old John is the person that wants to sell you a piece of electronics quackery, his $400 deluxe "CD Clarifier."

Another interesting observation about the "Kromrey Converter" thread when I was reading it was that when people expressed doubts, other people that were not really contributing to the thread went in and bulllied and intimidated the people that were expressing doubts to shut them up.

The moral of the story is to not deceive yourself into believing that nobody can get results because nobody has the "unique and special" inductive resistor that is made in South Africa only.  This does not make sense and is simply not true.

MileHigh

[powercat]

Rosemary
I notice you didn't answer my question so here it is again

There is an easy way to clear up this situation
Aaron reproduces 5 of the working circuits and then he posts them to members like TK, Hoppy, Fuzzy, MileHigh, 99
Okay there is a cost but this can be sorted out once the principle is established.
Can you ask Aaron if he is willing to do this ?

At the very least one working circuit could be posted to Stefan but maybe you think he would not admit to gain either

cat

[Rosemary Ainslie]

MileHigh - I've stated unambiguously - I will admit defeat if we do not reach COP>17 on Fuzzy's resistors that he's making.  I'm just not mentally equipped to leave questions outstanding.  I need to get to finality.

But that still leaves the negative voltage to be evaluated together with the clear evidence of COP>1.5.  Both need duplication and proper data capture.  That will - hopefully - go to some academic for evaluation.  Who knows, maybe even another paper to be written and probably also rejected for publication.  But I think they merit consideration - surely?

No-one is being bullied 'not' to express doubts here.  I'm happy to express them freely and on low values will front the queue.  But, with the utmost respect to all believers, non-believers - whoever - our opinion here counts for naught.  It is only mainstream's opinion that matters and hopefully the time will come when they'll at least look to the question.  It's most compelling argument is on high wattages and higher co-efficiencies.  I still harbour the hope that we'll get there.

[Rosemary Ainslie]

Rosemary
I notice you didn't answer my question so here it is again

There is an easy way to clear up this situation
Aaron reproduces 5 of the working circuits and then he posts them to members like TK, Hoppy, Fuzzy, MileHigh, 99
Okay there is a cost but this can be sorted out once the principle is established.
Can you ask Aaron if he is willing to do this ?

At the very least one working circuit could be posted to Stefan but maybe you think he would not admit to gain either

cat

Cat - can you advance one reason why Aaron should oblige you on this matter?  I'd sooner recommend that he send the circuits to different universities for evaluation.  I think Aaron's interest in persuading contributors here is long over and gone.

[Hoppy]

Hoppy - when we get to the point that COP>17 is clearly not replicable - I assure you I will be the first to admit defeat.  And regarding Aaron's talents - they are amazing.  May I remind you.  He romped home with oscillation spikes at 1000 volts when TK could not even get oscillation.  He switched at 3% where TK could not switch at 90% on.  He then rebuilt the quantum switch and found the same 'switching facility'.  So did others on this forum.  He then experimented with waveforms and managed a DC to AC converter where classicists could barely manage a spike.  And from what I've learned Harvey is definitely mainstream.  He just lends the project the kind of honest evaluation that you and MileHigh resist by prejudging the outcomes.

Rosemary,

Let me assure you that my test equipment is quite aduquate to see a COP>1 let alone one of COP17. I have seen nothing in Aaron's video's that remotely suggests that he his getting anywhere near COP17. As has been said repeatedly, he is working at ridiculously low power levels with a very untidy and 'iffy' setup. This is just not going to impress any EE.

Aaron needs to do the following things before I will take any further interest in his claims: -

1) Tidy up his setup by shortening interconnecting leads as much as possible.

2) Use soldered joints, not croc clips.

3) terminate all shunts to one common point close to, or directly onto the neg battery terminal (star earthing).

4) Ensure that the load resistor is running 'hot' before taking measurements with a properly calibrated DSO. The purpose of this test is to demonstrate a high COP with a hot resistor, not a cold one!

Hoppy