Claimed OU circuit of Rosemary Ainslie

[Harvey]

Just a little thought :
if you have mechanical resonant circuit you can leave it oscillating but soon friction will stop it
you can force oscillation but that would be always a loose in input power
or you can "push" it in correct moment , not disturbing natural oscillations
also the start moment is important - imagine a pendulum started with a fast strong kick instead of slow smooth push

You mean something like this?:

http://www.rexresearch.com/milkovic/milkovic.htm

[forest]

Yes.Let it oscillate and inject power at correct moments. Eliminate friction. Find natural frequency and try to adjust mosfet to it.

[PaulLowrance]

meh, you're just pissy paul because this thread is getting the attention you 'think' your diode array should be. that's the only reason you're here with your negative comments, to pimp your diode array.

No, you're wrong. I don't seek attention. If I wanted attention I would make a fake design that sounds terrific, not provide exact details, and string people on for months. Hmmm, sounds like the so-called "Rosemary Ainslie" claim.  I've given everyone a chance to prove that so-called "so-called" is sincere, and they've failed miserably. Show these magazine articles show wrote. Show anything. You people who work with here dodge all testing methods that would have ended this entire case weeks ago. You continue with ridiculous testing procedures that would only guarantee that this case continue on.

She can't provide the exact method of replicating it even though she claims to have done it numerous times. Have her mail you one of her devices.

You & your group get pissed because every once in awhile I come into this thread posting info that would get *legit* researchers to wait for so-called "Rosemary Ainslie" to be sincere.

i agree with harvey, if it should only take 2 days, then have at it. if you do that, and that's a big if, i think you will find yourself mistaken...

Nice try, but no thanks. I'll wait till so-called "Rosemary Ainslie" can show one sign of sincerity.

ask poynt, he thought something similar a hundred pages ago and did he 'get er done' in 2 days? nope. so if you're going to tell us all how it should be done, why don't you get on it and do it your own way, or go back to your mental masturbation with your diodes that don't make any useful power.

poynt did it wrong. I tried to warn him. He entered into a nightmare task. The correct method of verifying this case is very simple.



Paul

[PaulLowrance]

I'll keep that in mind the next time my car won't start. Seriously though, I have noticed that you have a lot of catching up to do here before your comments will have any true merit. This is probably the reason you have not been engaged in any real technical dialog here. Your initial attacks on Rosemary definitely put you off on a bad foot here - I for one would really like an explanation regarding your requests of her which I personally found offensive and intrusive with absolutely no bearing whatsoever on the study under way.

If you want to be taken seriously, then you need to establish your purpose here and be specific. I know you have had enough time on forums to understand that no reader likes to backtrack through pages of drivel trying to find the meaning behind some compound referential statement.

Nevertheless, I will address your concern here with an attempt at civility. Let's blackbox the circuit. We have 3 power sources, a blackbox, and a heating element - aka inductive resistor. Two of the power sources are put in series and go directly to, and only to the heating element. The third source goes directly to, and only to, the control circuit. The parameters are such, that the frequency, current and voltage in the heating circuit are all variable and for most intents and purposes random within certain bounds. The heating circuit and the control circuit share a common connection which in the future we may choose to isolate, but for now they are connected at the B(-). (See http://www.energeticforum.com/72259-post3037.html )

Now, using the above information, how specifically did you expect to determine the power in vs. the power out again? And if your qualifications are in order, what prohibits you from performing the 'two day' test yourself?

I already went over this. You measure the *DC* current & voltage of the batteries. A simple low pass filter using a single op-amp will suffice. That's gives the power in. To measure the power out you measure how fast the components heat up, and then compare that to a control experiment. Very simple.

Paul

[fuzzytomcat]

She can't provide the exact method of replicating it even though she claims to have done it numerous times. Have her mail you one of her devices.

You & your group get pissed because every once in awhile I come into this thread posting info that would get *legit* researchers to wait for so-called "Rosemary Ainslie" to be sincere.

Nice try, but no thanks. I'll wait till so-called "Rosemary Ainslie" can show one sign of sincerity.

Paul

Being your not a *legit* researcher and never have been I can see why you have all the problems you do .... when a untrained monkey could possibly build this very small and well documented circuit ..... what actually is you problem ?? Jealousy, Ignorance or Stupidity ?? 

http://i276.photobucket.com/albums/kk15/fuzzytomcat/RA-COP17HeaterCircuit_01.jpg