Claimed OU circuit of Rosemary Ainslie

[PaulLowrance]

I have no idea why there are over 230 pages in this thread.  It should take .99 less than 30 minutes to complete his experiment. All of the scope stuff is meaningless unless .99 can convince me he's a senior EE or has extensive experience with such measurements.

Less than 30 minutes: stick thermistor on top part of mosfet heat sink. Fire up the Ainslie circuit. Measure temp above ambient. Then do the control exp. Remove mosfet. Place battery across mosfet drain/source. Place enough voltage on mosfet gate to get enough DC current to heat it up to the same temp. Calculate power from the control exp. Done! 

Paul

[WilbyInebriated]

All of the scope stuff is meaningless unless .99 can convince me he's a senior EE or has extensive experience with such measurements.

what kind of nonsense is this? it's meaningless unless? good grief.
"calculate" the power... for the love of zeus are you serious? CALCULATE? you might as well simulate it too.

sorry i forgot about you in my last post, not very polite of me to leave out the pauly come lately.

“A great many people think they are thinking when they are merely rearranging their prejudices.” -edward r. murrow

[PaulLowrance]

what kind of nonsense is this? it's meaningless unless? good grief.

I'm overwhelmed by your evidence. You must love the word "ambiguous."  By all means continue your handwaving.

When your mind wakes up, post the procedure for measuring real power across a reactive & resistive element. When you fail miserably to explain the procedure, then maybe you will understand why .99 scope power measurements greatly differ from the temperature measurements.

Paul

[WilbyInebriated]

I'm overwhelmed by your evidence. You must love the word "ambiguous."  By all means continue your handwaving.

When your mind wakes up, post the prodecure for measuring real power across a reactive & resistive element.

Paul

please explain how it is meaningless unless... instead of avoiding the point i raised with your strawman argument and logical fallacy.

[PaulLowrance]

please explain how it is meaningless unless... instead of avoiding the point i raised with strawmen and logical fallacy.

Yawn, more of your ambiguous claims-- handwaving. I did. Answer, again: because it is extremely difficult. Try reading, or wake up.

Now lets see you explain how to conduct such measurements, LOL. I'm betting you will not explain it because you don't know how.

Paul