MPI Patent

[Overtone]

Tinsel,

If you read my earlier reply it states clearly that a further filing is in the works for the device to exceed unity. The first prototype exceeded unity by a very large margin at extremely low power. 

However, developing this particular technology into a commercial product is complex and expensive and other solid-state generators are likely to be in production more rapidly.

Another patent is pending on a different family of generators and several more patent applications are in line.

[turbo]

Marco,

The statement about your physical condition is almost a direct quote from one of your own posts on this website. Your memory is obviously also failing.   

Yes  it is, you are correct.

[Nali2001]

Well if one wants yo maintain the good squareloop properties of a nanocrystalline core you better not machine it at all. And if you do, to the very least it has to be re-annealed.

Don't know what properties you are depending on, Hi freq low loss or high freq square loop (both?). But it is tricky to keep these properties intact when you machine cores like 2605 metglas or Finemet Ft3. So I can imagine that such stuff needs to be reprocessed. But even then not all is 'best'. Its a trade off, but you either do that or noting at all.

Can you tell me what core type you use and what specific properties you expect from it?

Thanks!
Kind regards,
Steven

[Overtone]

Steven,

Sorry. That is propritary information.

[TinselKoala]

Tinsel,

If you read my earlier reply it states clearly that a further filing is in the works for the device to exceed unity. The first prototype exceeded unity by a very large margin at extremely low power. 

However, developing this particular technology into a commercial product is complex and expensive and other solid-state generators are likely to be in production more rapidly.

Another patent is pending on a different family of generators and several more patent applications are in line.

Mark, I've read just about everything you've written publicly since 1999, and for some reason it always says pretty much exactly the same thing. 
Jam yesterday, jam tomorrow, but no jam today.
And your claim of any excess power from your "first prototype" is just that: a claim, which no one has been able either to verify or replicate.