Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

Started by Pirate88179, June 27, 2009, 04:41:28 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 197 Guests are viewing this topic.

wattsup

Quote from: ronotte on January 11, 2012, 04:21:18 AM
@wattsup
Congrats: you did it ;) Only some considerations:

1- You are seeing that in order to have a minimum real output you need a very strong HV/freq source (as I did in the beginning using the 9KV Ventex neon sign indicator's Power supply). The noise coming from the SG is an indication. In that condition, as you have experimented, all electronic devices in the nearing go berserk ??? indicating HF pollution being enormous: I warn you to stay at least a couple of meters far from the coils or you are going to suffer many headaches or other worst things. The reason I reverted using a much lower input voltage/power (max 1.5KV hence a silent 1KV arrestor as SG...no noise at all) has been just that. The scope being to set it up in a safe way allowing to stay safely and for hours near the coils...and only then rise the input power to see the real possibilities.

2 - Yes, your lamp a little lighted...but is it so important...and useful? probably on lamp only a fractional watt...certainly far from any OU. I tell you that I've not been able to reach more output regardless of any possible tuning. I thing that the STAAAR team changed direction toward capacitive coils just for that reason. My personal opinion is that this is not the best solution but just an effort (very clever) to try an idea.

3 - Please pay attention to waveform you see with probe near the Caduceus input wire (after SG1) or on output pickup coil (before SG2): I have seen briefly on your scope a well known wave's image and I tell you that it is wrong as it shows max just after the SG's firing: in other word you are seeing an inverted triangle. Look at my last pic: the trumpet shape starts with low amplitude and rise exponentially up to a max when the SG fires. I took lot of time to arrange tuning in order to get such an output to be considered fundamental to have an OU chance. Once you see that then you have to maximize the exponential amplitude: for the moment I've been unable to obtain more than showed (about 400Vpp) but it is also true that I am using only 1.3-1.5KV input.

My fear is that next step could be completely different to allow the jump up to next level...remember the Tesla many pats about the bifilar amplifying coil...and the V. Utkin paper that I urge you to read many times and try to understand the much not said but implied...then apply that new knowledge to our practical implementation.

Roberto

@ronotte

As per your numbered comments.

1) Yes the sparks are playing havoc on everything. Also the headache thing could happen at certain frequencies but not all the range. That is to be better understood indeed. I don't think at this stage there is any real danger since our bodies are rather strong and I am not worried about affecting DNA in the blood or anything like that. I do however think that some high frequencies are good for the body because I am sure parasites and all anaerobic organisms that are not good for the body may be neutralized. But that is another question and I have been taking MMS2 in December and will restart again this week. This is a great parasite killer for the body.

Anyways to not change the subject, I noticed that the spark was not real good on my previous build where I used these metal L-brackets and long screws with bolts to make the spark gap. It would seem that so much metal mass will kill the HV effect to produce a maximum spark. That is why you get a great spark when just using the direct wires from the flyback.

This is getting me to consider that for the Yoke testing, it will be better not to put a copper strip for the 1T. I had alluded to that possibility in a post located here on page 627. See the part for @T-1000.
http://www.overunity.com/7679/selfrunning-free-energy-devices-up-to-5-kw-from-tariel-kapanadze/msg307153/#msg307153

In my thinking, the HV is not made for solid objects like copper strips. Let's say your HV in the cooper strips reacts just like the spark gap itself. It is a thin let's say 0.5mm width of intense electrical activity that jumps from on gap end to the other. It is the same that is occurring in your 2cm copper strip. There is only 1/2mm of that copper strip that is letting the energy pass through it and the 1/2mm is dancing inside that 1/2cm so it is being diluted by the mass. HV needs thin copper wires to guide it along it path. So either have one wire going back and forth or one wire split into many parallel wires will be 100 times better then a copper strip. I know I am changing the subject but this is coming from all sides each time you discover something else.

So my spark gap is now very lean and I am using two bronze rods I took from a welding rod. I will eventually try other rod materials.

2) I have some real hunches to try out with this now working prototype. I think there is a question of lack of inductance in the system so I will be adding some other coils inside the loop and see how it effects this. Huh, lack of inductance could also be coil capacitance. lol

3) Yes I understand that and I think it is because my capacitor does not have high enough pF so it is getting filled to fast and can only decline afterwards, but if the pF is higher then the charge, it will have to fill up before discharge and I think this is where you see the increasing trumpet waveform.

Regarding Tesla, I think I am 1 or 2 steps away from being able to really replicate the Tesla Ozone Patent using the spark gap as make/break.

I will be experimenting all nights this week so more fun to come.

wattsup


ronotte

@DreamThinkBuild
I appreciate it very much: thank you
Roberto

FreeEnergyInfo


verpies

Quote from: wattsup on January 11, 2012, 09:54:07 AM
@Ghazanfar

In your picture the 1T is not where you are pointing. I think in that one it is the two blue wires on the left that come from inside the half of the yoke core with the 15T and 50T turns.

The 1T can be seen here;
http://purco.qc.ca/ftp/Tariel-Kapanadze/Wessley-WNY-Group/build3/copper/

The 1T is not in series with anything. It is the one that receives the HV output from your flyback or other HV source.

I agree with wattsup.
The copper strip is the 1-turn transverse winding.

FreeEnergyInfo