Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

[stivep]

Not from large transformer but from inverter transformer.
but that information is valuable Thank You


Wesley




PS: and later addition to subject discussed
Please look for more I appreciate it.
I will give you another one:


at the bottom of the heav beam structure there is the metal covering space inside  T beams..
TK elevate it to show that there is no wires  ...
but he show
that by reasoning of philosophy


there is no 'signification" and no "motivation" to cover bottom of metal base of TK rotary device


That supports "reasoning"






Conclusion:
- that space  might of be used  for hiding batteries in big amount of them.
- that space  might of be used for area under the discs to be controlled by driven mechanism operating   on Lorenz law  and/or utilizing Faraday disc principals  at modernized version


for that to happened than


- part of metal  sheet underneath of  discs should be made of nonmetallic material.(none magnetic flux blocking material)


or


- elevated  supports for brackets holding shaft  (gorizontalnyj stierzen , osku,)
from inner side facing disc have had the same  kind of covering material
that  is why TK used Foam to prevent visual inspection

==========================================================


Perception of TK  (PTK) analysis versus  "perception of analytic party" PAP)
analytic party = person, device and/or mechanism of controlling and verification and validation of TK devices and technologies  ( in our case)=AP
TK perception is  assigned at "level 1" PTK=L1
Level 1= stage of recognition manifesting its presence and its "domination".( in our case) L1
Domination stays for level of difference  to the " level 1" could be
=,
<  >,
in "motion of constant change",




motion of constant change- is dependability of "domination" ( in our case) =MCC
from analytic party " AP"

level of certainty is in our case delay factor at  delta T time delay)= LC

word "or" is in our case - logic manipulator



Simplified Analysis:

PTK =L1  or MCC
PAP =L1 or >or< or MCC




if PAP  equal  PTK  than = L1
if PAP < L1 than PTK is in control of  MCC  and LC
If PAP> L1 than  TK is loser or he might be paid for his invention but based on MCC depending on LC ( in any scenario right or wrong , his  device and/or secrets are known to  AP)


if (at certain  delta T ) LC is dominator of  MCC than


PAP>L1 than MCC =LC> L1
or if
TKP>L1 than MCC=LC>L1
by equation TKP>L1 we understand increased  ability of TK to understand and perform comparing to any  earlier given period of time. Than there is a need to place L1 in time frame.


So because till today
PAP is <L1
than
TKP is=L1
than
PAP<TKP
than
TKP=L1=MCC=LC
Conclusion: I this case TK is in control of motion( that means he can make any motion >=< than Zero.)


Statue of limitation : Motion depends on  driving mechanism= energy of motion( in our case)= SOL
In TK case the motion is based on money from shows.
That says that TK has no other income known to us.
That stays that TK do not want to  give up his control over the device.
If than
PAP = L1
than
PAP=L1=MMC=LC

what is than the reason that AP stay quiet?


factor of gain (in our case) = FOG
-Factor of gain should be understand as  present of future  gain based on  MCC and LC
-Factor of gain of AP ,should be analyzed based on past gain versus of lose of  gain ( say investor made commitments with oil guys and got money from them to  deal with TK.... verification of technology  and  level of danger estimation )

(tendency) vector of AP is of FOG>0
(tendency) vector of TK is of FOG>0

if FOG of AP>0  based on L1 and PAP=or>L1
than
FOG x infinity-SOL=PAP=FOG-SOL
word "infinity" is used as  multiplier 1x,2, ....100000... and so on.

That means
That
PAP=FOG-SOL


There you go...
That is  explanation why TK is/was not being denoted, denominated, disintegrated( murdered),Put into the trash,named liar,and prosecuted for fraud  , imprisoned, and so on...
They are all in fear of   
TK hidden files








Wesley

[27Bubba]

"I'm still working on it"

OK, keep working on it. Meanwhile I get another Tylenol pill, my head hurts..

[forest]

I think nobody here likes to think clearly, but everybody tries to think deeply.

“The scientists of today think deeply instead of clearly. One must be sane to think clearly, but one can think deeply and be quite insane.”
― Nikola Tesla

Kapanadze in one of videos (green box) mentioned Melnichenko, and said that that guy is very close. That should point all of you to correct path I think. Just my  2 cents.

[nightwind]

@ Verpies

Would the following work as a method of power measurement?
Measure the heat output of a bulb with a infrared non-contact thermometer ($30) under normal power and then measure the bulb heat output being powered by the OU circuit.  This should directly correlate with output watts in percentage terms.  The only drawback I see - will the light spectrum of the bulb screw up the infrared reading?  Thanks

Edit: Use a power resister or heat coil instead?

[verpies]

@ Verpies

Would the following work as a method of power measurement?
Measure the heat output of a bulb with a infrared non-contact thermometer ($30) under normal power and then measure the bulb heat output being powered by the OU circuit.  This should directly correlate with output watts in percentage terms.  The only drawback I see - will the light spectrum of the bulb screw up the infrared reading?  Thanks

Edit: Use a power resister or heat coil instead?

Almost. The problem with measuring temperature instead of the radiant flux is that hot air accumulates in closed boxes. Without an insulating enclosure the influence of the embient temperature is just too unpredictable.
So the cheapest and most accurate way is to measure the radiant flux of an incandescent light bulb (or even a portion of it, e.g. visible or infrared portion) in a dark box with some kind of a monotonic radiation sensor, such as a common photodiode, phototransistor, photoresistor or a solar cell (photovoltaics) or even a photographic luxmeter.

To use such a cheap wattmeter, first the electrical power input would need to be correlated with e.g. light sensor output.  Such as shown below: