Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

[frantz]

@frantz

Very interesting. Thanks for sharing.

Bubba,
You welcome.
But in my opinion is not final version of TK solution... ;-)
I have some idea, I will check this and share.

Frantz

[T-1000]

Q1: Is the @T-1000 diagram showing.......

a) the TBC110LA Lithuanian flyback as it is originally made, including the primary, secondaries and HV coils, or,

b) is this flyback design a recommended design that is proposed by @T-1000 as a trial basis to be used with the rest of his circuit diagram.

a). We tried our best to draw schemtic out of existing flyback. Then we just took air coil and did wound our own version of flyback, where primary calculated with vacuum tube and secondary coils are in same way as in flyback. Just they are single layer in air coil.

Q2: OK the HV coil is showing to have two windings L12 and L13 that will be placed on the opposite core end versus the Q3: Which ever is wound first, is there a preferred direction left-right or right-left.
pri/sec core end. Which HV coil is wound first, the 4 layer or the 16 layer?

In flyback, L12 is fully wound first, then good separating dialectric on it, then L13 is on top of that.
The HV coils are on opposite side of ferrite core.

Q4: Let's say 4 layer is first wound CW from left to right and 16 layer is wound CCW from left to right. Which wires are supposed to be either...

a) connected together inside the coil.
b) if they are not connected together inside the HV coil are they just left open ended inside the coil.

They do not have any galvanic connection between and loose pins are burried inside of dialectric.

Q5: In the diagram we see at L13 and end of L12 where @T-1000 mentions a "virtual capacitor". Is there anything physical that has to be added there when winding the HV coil?

There is no real capacitor, it is only for understanding for how L12 and L13 relate between.

Q6: @T-1000 mentions HV "cold" or as I put it HV- exits at L11 pin 7, when in the previous diagrams, the HV- exited at pin 4 with all coils 4-9 in series. This now means there is no need for the coil 6-7. Do we still need to have that coil 6-7 wound on the secondary side and just leave it open, but that would mean this flyback is not the Lithuanian original design. Hmmmm.

We used pins 1-3 for primary as we had external generator in first experiment and connected rest of prymary in series as it is shown here: http://freeenergylt.narod2.ru/lithuania_experiment/schematic_of_device_with_caduceus_coil_and_pickup_coil.jpg
Then in autogenerator mode we reused other part of primary coil.

I  guess the main question here is is this flyback design with 1/4 and full wave (now I understand it) dual inverted HV coils is based on the original Lithuanian design. If it is, great going and let's move ahead. If it is not, do we still need to make the original just in case. Don't know yet.

It is Lithuanian

You can save your money and try to make own bigger coil as following:

Wind secondary(L3) from the end of tube to beginning and leave 1/3 free space from used. Then leave few centimeters gap and wind wire opposite(L2) with 1/4 length of wire in previous winding L3.
The last thing is primary(L1).
Here you choose one in way you want but remember, you need to oscillate at resonant frequency of L2. Pancake Tesla bifilar might be very usefull for this, just you could use standing wave for best results...

If you get complete coil, then the last thing you need - 2 frequencies into primary L1 where lower frequency is current and rides much higher frequency inside which is potential and resonant of L2 coil.

The resonant frequency of L2 is calculated in old method N. Tesla used: wire length ~= resonant frequency wave length.

The second thing N. Tesla used is about primary/secondary mass where mass of primary = mass of secondary. Still not sure how to match it because you will get quite big coil. Maybe mass of primary = mass of all secondaries together? This needs experimental results.

For best results, submerge coil into transformer oil. That will give huge kick in potentials..

Good luck!

[27Bubba]

Bubba,
You welcome.
But in my opinion is not final version of TK solution... ;-)
I have some idea, I will check this and share.

Frantz

I realize this..  Somehow I think it maybe a good starting point ...

[quantumtangles]

Best case scenario? Its an earth battery. In that event, all the melodramatic props (like Tesla coils in B movies about mad scientists) just waste energy. They are not needed (...unless they want to impress investors or get people to buy "plans" for the device).

= SCAM.

You only have to look at the 100kW "third party" verification to realise that they have'nt actually condescended to tell you who the independent third party is.  Did they have the efficiency of the machine verified by someone with a PhD in electrical engineering from a world ranking university (as one would hope and expect), or was it examined by the inventor's Aunt Mildred, or Donald Duck?

This is precisely the sort of harebrained scam a bunch of uneducated peasants with a get rich quick scheme would cook up. Bang a couple of Tesla coils together, make some sparks and pass the hat around. Ghastly.

[forest]

quantumtangles


who are you talking to ?  wrong channel !     You cannot convince here anybody we are here for TRUTH