Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

[wattsup]

You need insulation of 30kV+ between those two coils. Then as long the dielectric is not in over voltage condition, it will survive. Please make sure those 2 loose wires between coils are not exposed to air gap because it would be very bad dielectric.

Hopefully you get idea.

@T-1000 / @ronotte

OK, I have given the manufacturer the build spec so we will now see how it goes with them.
I asked for 5 of each Standard and Dual HV.
I asked them to consider increasing the Dual HV wire diameter from the original 0.17mm to any thicker gauge since there will be less winds.

@All

So while this is going on I will order their standard flyback and play around with other for a while since my flyback is now just toasting slowly from the inside so I am just trying out various primary winding methods to see their differences.

wattsup

[Kator01]

Sooo no one has tried the mag amp yet? You'd be surprised how well it works.


http://www.themeasuringsystemofthegods.com/magnetic%20amplifiers.pdf


No problems with silicon limitations to current other then the wire gauge.

There is a very interesting circuit on page 18

Here is the other side of non linear amps:

http://www.capturedlightning.org/hot-streamer/pool/dielectric.htm

Hi jbignes5,

I have studied and build transductor or magamp-controler for more than a year. The problem is to get access to the energy contained in iron ( spontaneous magnetisation ). This technique must be studied more in depth because it is the way to excite the ZPE to enter via Iron. Unfortunately my time is limited now to further explore this. The link sort of blocks my browser - there is no reaction and I have to shut my browser down via task-manager.

Regards

Kator01

[jbignes5]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dEEaAwwGTZM&feature=channel


This is what I was getting at. Also the mag amp would replace most of the traditional transistors and you can make it so it will not back feed to the source signal through transformer action. There are circuits that allow for both positive and negative feedback as well and a sort of auto control for the transistor via that feed back from what I am understanding.

I am betting also if we changed the input coil to bifilar it would be come very very sensitive and non reflecting to the source signal. On the other hand using a bifilar coil as the main power pathway hasn't been explored by me yet.

This is the method that the jewel thief uses. The only difference is how you provide the input signal. In the case of the transistor we must provide the signal via internal coil. As with the Jewel thief it was designed to work via splitting and feedback. Think about this now. We could have a jewel thief that doesn't need the transistor via it's own input wind to the core. The standard jewel thief doesn't have that input winding and only works in a feedback mode via the transistor.

I'm starting on research in this area.

[wattsup]

@All

I just had to put this video here. This and the others are old jewels of EE that are just so great to see back then in their time frame and guys just may see something.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HPT7Wtp3yoo&NR=1

No news yet.

wattsup

[frantz]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dEEaAwwGTZM&feature=channel


This is what I was getting at. Also the mag amp would replace most of the traditional transistors and you can make it so it will not back feed to the source signal through transformer action. There are circuits that allow for both positive and negative feedback as well and a sort of auto control for the transistor via that feed back from what I am understanding.

I am betting also if we changed the input coil to bifilar it would be come very very sensitive and non reflecting to the source signal. On the other hand using a bifilar coil as the main power pathway hasn't been explored by me yet.

This is the method that the jewel thief uses. The only difference is how you provide the input signal. In the case of the transistor we must provide the signal via internal coil. As with the Jewel thief it was designed to work via splitting and feedback. Think about this now. We could have a jewel thief that doesn't need the transistor via it's own input wind to the core. The standard jewel thief doesn't have that input winding and only works in a feedback mode via the transistor.

I'm starting on research in this area.

Hi jbignes5
I have bad news in regard to movie which you put over.


This circuit is powered by pulsed DC current. In fact this is a sum of DC and AC current.
In fact, current in coil have only one direction - magnetic flux too.
In this point electric motor taking some power (current measurement on input of transformer).
when you put neo magnet to the core in first position, you are adding magnetic flux to constant pulsed flux and you are near of the saturation point of transformer.
Magnet i other direction moving flux in down and in fact constant part of flux from signal is removed by magnet flux. Finlay we have alternate part of flux in transformer.
F.ex.
if you remove transformer and connect directly motor to power source, you will have better solution or put AC on input of transformer without DC part.
There is no OU.
I'm sorry for this but I would like to save your time.


Frantz