Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

[verpies]

Nice bipolar(??) mag amp you got there looks promising.

The device appearing in the patent in Reply #11684 is so substantialy different from Magnetic Amplifiers, to not qualify as a Mag Amp or even a Saturable Reactor.

The main difference is that:
1) in Magnetic Amplifiers and Saturable Reactors, the control winding creates magnetic flux only in the same dimension as the main flux, thus linearly opposing or aiding the main flux, contrary to the control winding of the device depicted in that patent, which creates flux that is also perpendicular to the main flux (in another dimension), thus creating new flux loops.

The other significant differences are:
2) In Mag Amps the majority of the magnetic flux originates from the AC load/input winding - in the patent the main flux originates from the permanent magnet.
3) Mag Amps have an load/input winding and a control winding as well as a bias winding - the device in the patent does not have a bias winding (only control and output windings).
4) Mag Amp's function is to control a large load/input AC electric current via a small control electric current - the device in the patent does not even have a large input current (it has only control currents).
5) Mag Amps usually don't have a permanent magnet in their magnetic circuit (they have a bias winding instead).
6) In Mag Amps the magnetic flux is unidirectional. In Saturable Reactors and the device described in the patent the magnetic flux is bidirectional (leading to hysteresis losses in the core).

See:
Saturable Reactors and Magnetic Amplifiers

Hey didn't a guy named Flynn do the same thing except with a motor design?

The Parallelpath technology from Joe Flynn is even more different from it.

[jbignes5]

Did you read the patent? It clearly says Magnetic amplifier and Saturable reactor. It's related to the mag amp. It clearly states it. look at section 0010. It's a reluctance switch which is very very close to the magmap. Thats why they stated the reference in the patent as prior art.

[Сергей В.]

Where ar circuits for replication and confirmation of effects?
If there are none, it is just another TK like box for waste of time...

P.S. Sorry to be sceptic but this forum thread already is taking too much time with "chit-chat" of people instead of actual devices replication..

If you think it's time waste than don't read the patents. It's for people which want to learn something new. With that kind of thinking like yours you can close the forum and stay all the life in ignorance.  Remember many people here are researchers and inventors not salesman and bankers.  The same question you can ask your governement: where are Free Energy generators and why all inventors of free energy devices were killed or disappeared from face of earth?? Think about !!

To other OU members

Working Replica of Don Smith
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G24Yrz4YcdA

ps. Thanks Don wherever you are now!!

reproduction in quantity of magnetic flux read here -  article on Russian
http://001-lab.at.ua/index/razmnozhenie_magnitnogo_potoka/0-20

Nor one knowledge can't be absolutely !! Thanks to mother NATURE!!

[Qwert]

This forum's "DOWNLOAD" section has two pdf documents of current interest:
Magnetic Amplifiers Principles and Applications 1960
Magnetic Amplifiers, U.S. Navy 1951

[Сергей В.]

I think we need HOT LINE for Free Energy Documents and Informations !! I mean on International FREE ENERGY HOT LINE !! 

THINK ABOUT !!