Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

[jbignes5]

For those who don't know what the lines are all about here is a clue...

Here is another good pdf showing the magamp and it's uses. There is a lot
of room to improve the technology IMHO. Bifilar winds are coming to mind for the input and bias taps.

[stivep]

ТРАНСФОРМАТОР 2012http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rS0ekEsIuJA&feature=em-uploademail


Interesting :
COP=50% over 100

Some  facts:
at start of video  current 0 A at input.  and 2 W out
than increase  of the load gives him  50% less consumption from the grid comparing to  output load.

At the 21:39 minute: he proposes
schematic of power station that does not need any power supply at all.
Yes in initial impulse is required.


The data  from that Russian video   is  only visual assumption.There is lack of empirical data based on true  measurement analysis
yet strong enough to really pay attention to this concept






playing with magnetic part of electromagnetic field  does NOT need core made of metal nor ferrite.
Well sound strange?


At first  where is the energy  stored in capacitor?
The answer  is:
The energy is stored  in dielectric.


1.You take plates of capacitor  and glass  container ( glass cup)
the plates in this example look like  inner cylinder and outer cylinder
2.You charge capacitor
3. You remove plates with non insulated  long nose pliers, leaving glass container  empty
3a.You touch dielectric with your hands !!!!
4. than you take the two plates into your  hands and short them out
6. Move or do not move dielectric to  another location ( say 10 cm  forward) .You touch dielectric with your hands !!!!
7. put plates back to its original  place
8. short the plates
9. spark will indicate about 90-99% of original charge.
[size=1.8333em]
MIT Physics Demo -- Dissectible Capacitorhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9ckpQW9sdUg


There are two ways to charge capacitor


1. by displacement
2. by external charge


ad1 Displacement  when you change the volume  between the plates
that includes volume of nothing in perfect  vacuum
The effect is the same.


ad2
external  charge  = energy from  any power source.






conclusion:
- when you  remove plates  as described above than by removing you create displacement that is origination of additional charge.
- when you short plates than  you discharging only  part of charge that comes from displacement but the one that  happened  because of you bringing plates one next to the other.
But if you  have been holding plates in your  hands than there is  presumably no potential discharge  ( resistance of the hands)




So what this has to do with video  from above?
Well in capacitor we have presence of magnetic flux at 90 degrees  to electrical line of  charge
got the picture? ?




General conclusion:






If than dielectric is the  storage of charge than vacuum as dielectric is storage of charge...
sounds strange? ??


If you can change position of dielectric after was charged with no plates on it  from point A to point B
and than apply  plates or new set of plates and discharge it than


than interesting is if you take in  space part of vacuum and partition it with metal plates


The  whole structure than  is put in motion at vector V and speed  delta T

But after charge you remove plates and try to apply that plates to that   part of vacuum at 1 million miles away from that point . Yes it would be new set of plates.


So what.


Train of charged space once charged.
That is what falsification of Mendeleev periodic table was for....


first  row of  his table belongs to Ether   that is expressed in NUTONII


WESLEY


train of energy..


Ps Reading  what is above:I was not as radical to that point ever in my life.I do not make any statements.
But what if.... what if.... some of this is taking place.








Second subject:


I try to keep to basis of physics but physic can lie as well.
Yesterday I was discussing subject of dust-ification  of towers at 9/11 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZWjktDuIhR8
brought  to court by Dr Judy Wood
She pointed at patent of Piggott as origination  to John Hutchinson transmutation and anti-gravity
Than she was  comparing  Hutchinson effect to   9/11    http://www.freepatentsonline.com/pdfb/documents/uspt/patent_pdf/1006/US1006786/pdf/US1006786.pdf[/font]



It was very disappointing  that 3 major brains within that  small scientific community without analyzing any data of Dr Judy Wood have  been supporting official version of 9/11


I supported my questions based on historical  data
1911  patent for Piggott was issued  but only after 10 years of waiting... filing day  1901 and that is because of
JP Morgan  and/or his power( Chase bank) activity to stop  that  from happening.( the same  man who finished progress of Nicola Tesla




In 70s [size=78%] [/size]

Eric Dollard Peter Lindemann Tesla's Longitudinal Electricity http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=endscreen&NR=1&v=Y4m82cvThd8[/color]
later  DR Lidemann  show video about longitudinal waves  standing that 1000V per  square mm creates environment for  power transmitting at DC
kind of tunnel for one to imagine.....
Piggott patent contains  transmitter that due to pressurization air is  increasing dielectric constant of the air  so that level could be  achieved.


In 1980's  John Hutchison  experimented with  anti-gravity and transmutation that  has basic principals taken from Piggott patent. She also says that she witnessed demonstration of transmutation effect.


Based on available statements:
In roughly 1983 John had visitors  from Pentagon for period of 4  months.
In 1989 Forth Mammoth in NJ  US Army[size=78%]http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0022369771900369
was very much advanced in transmutation effects than  document was declasified in may 2004 that means long after  9/11 when there was no fear od conclusion any longer.. .............. dead wrong...................
also another patent below is related to transmutation
[size=78%]http://www.rexresearch.com/meyernmr/meyer.htm[/size]




Was that that  army was just starting with transmutation only   after  John Hutchison experiment?
Was that than only perceptive similarity  between dustification of vertical beams  of towers and destructive pattern
of that event to the one pointed by Dr Judy Wood in John experiments?






I do not expect  from anyone to agree with me. But I expect fair data and fair discussion based on scientific facts and hypothesis.


There was none...........
What they are afraid of? ??
Or they just show their true faces............
F.....................................k that ugly world of  servants of the big brother..


 


    http://www.freepatentsonline.com/pdfb/documents/uspt/patent_pdf/1006/US1006786/pdf/US1006786.pdf












how about if
TK was using similar arrangement's  but using different material to redirect magnetic flux?

[e2matrix]

stivep,  thanks for your continuing info and contributions.  That first video in the post above seems to have already been deleted.  Do you have any other links to it? 

[Shokac]

Wesley

forget NMR. TK not use NMR.

TK use simplest things. Hi use High current from electromagnetic discharge, like lightning.

Again and again..... TK in classical 220V or 110V circuit pump current! forgat voltage (voltage take from grid or from inverter)

read this article.
http://www.catastrophism.com/texts/bruce/era.htm

Chapter:

(3.9.2) Current Wave-Shape
All atmospheric discharges will have similar current wave-shapes. A relatively rapid rise to peak current will be followed by a somewhat slower decline and a long tail, the form we are familiar with in the lightning discharge. This is for example the wave-form shown by the broadening of the Ha line in solar flares. It is also a well-known feature of the spectra during the initial stages of novae and efforts have been made by many investigators to explain it in terms of a rapid acceleration of the luminous gas followed by an almost equally rapid deceleration. As this part of the wave-form coincides with the period during which the line-broadening, dlal², is that of the Zeeman effect, it is at once explained by the rise and fall of the current in the discharge.

Fig.8: Oscillogram of high lightning current wave (Berger and Vogelsanger). Curve shown on two time scales:

[stivep]

that is what I was able to get  before it was no longer:)







Update:Ok you do not have to wait any longer just  view it:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GHBe9EG1xBA




   Wesley