Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

[jbignes5]

Maybe this will help. Also you are comparing two different systems. The one you are talking about had to be implemented because of the limitation to the ground and the effects on matter. Tesla warned that too much through a conductor explodes the conductor with TNT like force or better then.


Check this out for the smaller unit.


Now please remember this is un-energized. Just from the standing potentials alone there flows a very heavy current between the two grounds but he cuts down the current by making it an inductive loop and not a direct short. Also the way the current goes through the device is very important to how this works even when un-energized. In it's un-energized state the unit resists flow by the inductive choking through each bifilar coil. But when the field is augmented by the pulses full current flows based on the fields value to each coil. The solenoid coil aroind the bifilar also helps to keep the current from unpolarizing by the use of the flap or fold of the solenoid. This is the minimum it takes to hold the current at bay. This is exactly what the mag-amp uses in it's process of polarization.
When you understand that the only current that can flow is ground current then you see how this works. Energizing the field of biasing the field forces the coil to overide the restrictions and allows full flow and control over the process simply by inputting a very small current but very high voltage.

Lets look at this from another direction.

The mag amp will control as much current even with a small input. It may look like it is free energy but I assure you it is very circular in it's methods. Loops are the main factor and it is very relevant when looking at water bridges and higher voltages. Once the loop is started it will hold very very strongly like a string through pearls.

Example: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iC8KDYcdiUI

If you watch closely you can see the water flowing back and forth based on the charge value of both glasses when the water is energized. It's oscillation is very slow but you can see the level changing on both sides back and forth.

So now you can replace things through substitution. The water is current and the medium is voltage potential through a mass. The water will move based on the values from both sides. As the mass of water shifts so does the value associated with that mass. Since water is very pliable it shifts back and forth all by itself. In solid matter there is no such mechanism so current must flow because each spot has a certain resistance and standing voltage. V*R=current this gives us polarization and now the current flows between two different values of V.

Shorts have always plagued us and the ground loop is no exception. Until today I never thought you could have gotten anything from such a short but it seems that if we use the distance and conductors that we can do anything one wanted or needed. My only question is what does this do the that area in between the two electrodes or grounds? Is this healthy or should we use a virtual grounding system to help out with effects that we didn't noticed.

One thing that made me such a great computer Tech was reckoning something outside of the unit afflicted it till malfunction. Ground loops are so common because they chose safety over quality. The only way to get rid of the problem was to cut one of the grounds but then again it was highly illegal in the states here.

Lets look at the worst of the cases:

Transformer loops to ground: http://www.bapihvac.com/content/uploads/2010/07/Understanding-Ground-Loops.pdf

"The second safety issue is to keep equipment within its normal operating voltage range.  Most
modern Direct Digital Controllers (DDC) will operate correctly without a ground connection
anywhere.  The only catch is that the non-grounded equipment may build up large static charges
due to insulation leakage.  The first person that comes along and touches the equipment gets a
very nasty shock.  If the static charge gets high enough, it will discharge to the nearest conductor
at a lower potential.  The instantaneous discharge currents can reach several thousand
amperes and destroy the electronic components of the system.  Grounding the system lets the
charges dissipate without damage."

Also remember that current and voltage move in opposite directions with voltage usually leading current. So in my picture below the black is voltage and the red is current. For half of the cycle. But what happens when you raise the voltage to like 1 kilovolts on the one side across the gap? If you add a magnet across the gap would it polarize the gap? What effect would that have on the character of the current?

If one caused 1000 volts @ 1 amp to flow across the gap and the ground loops and returns 1000 amps in the loops isn't that OU? Most likely the 1k volts will nearly induce 800-900v @ 1000 amps to be pulled into the system. This has not been experimentally disproven yet so get to it you nay sayers... Prove it wrong or get on board and help us...

Obviously my numbers are not proven yet but you get the picture.

Itsu proved that you can excite a cap into charging with one wire inductively on an unshielded cap. Very easily too. How about moving the cap to the internal of the bifilar coil so that it gets energized by the spark gap every time it fires, recharging the cap by the high voltage flowing in the ground loop.

Hey Itsu could you write what worked again and didn't work so we can rule out the already done experiments.

I also noted that I might have the upper solenoid connection on the wrong ground, instead of connecting to ground 2 it might be that it connects to ground 1. That way ground 2 will always be below ground 1 and thats where the charges enter the system from ground 2 to ground 1. Not sure about that one.

It could also be that he is just feeding off of other ground loops connected to the pipe since most electric companies tie the grounds to water pipes. They never gave a reading from the pipe to the radiator so....

[verpies]

How you want to deal with  impedance matching?
1. caduceus with spark?
2. yoke without spark
2a. yoke with spark?
3. inductive load of coil circuitry of TK projects?

The way I do it for VCVS amp is to use predistortion with AWG and low output impedance transistors in Half-bridge push-pull configuration for the output driver operating in the G, H, B or AB class - the predistortion cancels all of the non-linearities of the transistors and the cross-over distortion of the half-bridge.

I keep the source resistance as close to zero according to the Maximum Power Transfer Theorem.

The above allows me to drive large HF currents with good linearity of of the VCVS amplifier so constructed.  The limit of the output voltage is 1200Vp-p, but that's much higher than the voltage in industrial power lines, anyway.  If I need higher voltages, I use a RF step-up transformer and/or LC resonant rise. For higher current I use step-down transformers as well (e.g. for the 1turn winding in the Yoke device) 

Of course any use of the transformer precludes DC components in the output signal. If  DC component is needed above 1200V, the solution is a DC power source in series with the output of such amplifier.

It's difficult for me to answer the rest of your questions because I do not understand the input requirements of the devices descriped in pt.1 and pt.3.  Why is HV needed at their input anyway? 
I haven't studied these devices in detail because I find them unremarkable just like resonant transformers.

[verpies]

When you connect load to receiver coil you have impact to source. Why? Because we have reverse magnetic coupling.

If the receiver coil receives energy through resonant inductive coupling - a reactive near field wireless transmission (Frantz calls it "reverse magnetic coupling"), then the receiver will influence the transmitter.

However, if the electromagnetic wave is allowed to separate from the transmitter (as it naturally happens in the radiative far field), then the receiver will not influence the transmitter anymore.

This lack of influence does not mean OU though.
According to conventional theory it would take infinite amount of receivers to collect all of the EM energy radiated by the transmitter. 

The burden of proof is on those claiming otherwise.

[verpies]

NMR or whatever complex waves you guys are talking about makes no sense

Why not?
NMR and MRI has been observed many times in copper and most other matter, so it definitely is a real phenomenon that can happen.
I have seen no evidence that NMR plays a big role in the devices described by McFreey but I'd be far from calling it nonsense.
As far as I am concerned the jury is still out...

[frantz]

If the receiver coil receives energy through resonant inductive coupling - a near field wireless transmission (Frantz calls it "reverse magnetic coupling"), then the receiver will influence the transmitter.

However, if the electromagnetic wave is allowed to separate from the transmitter (as it naturally happens in the radiative far field), then the receiver will not influence the transmitter anymore.

This lack of influence does not mean OU though.
According to conventional theory it would take infinite amount of receivers to collect all of the EM energy radiated by the transmitter. 

The burden of proof is on those claiming otherwise.

@verpies,
just check!


Don't create theory, just check by experiment!!!!
Check two setups:
1. Two TC transformers vertically
2. One horizontally second vertically.


(first is transmiter, second receiver)




Regards
Frantz