Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

[Qwert]

(wll be fine if somebody grab a copy of Volume 7 TCBA NEWS from 1988)

Must be a registered member of the TCBA (Tesla Coil Builders Association) to see/download this stuff. I guess, easy task.
http://www.teslauniverse.com/tcba-volume_7-issue_1

[T-1000]

source:
http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/tesla/esp_tesla_20.htm

The image you posted originaly is in http://home.dmv.com/~tbastian/ball.htm (TESLA'S PRODUCTION OF ELECTRIC FIREBALLS)

Also I attached Tesla coil build guide from year 1912. It contains sensitive information how multilayer Tesla coils are wound (each layer as another bifiler connection on top of previous).

Cheers!

[jbignes5]

@wattsup


I agree about what you say. It seems to me that the machine gunning of my ideas has come about by others telling me about walls of text they "have" to wade through.


I know both tend to be hard to handle but there have been so many people that just do not want to admit that they have been deceived into thinking it is only one way. In nature that isn't so.


I have the greatest admiration for all of us here. At least we are trying to get to the bottom of the this. But it is like this:


I am a scientist who goes out in the world and meets a remote people living in seclusion. In my attempt to study them I introduce several objects into their world that they consider to be magic. In reality they are only common items of my society. Like a simple lighter. To them it seems like I can create the wondrous fire from my hands. But in reality I am using a device so common to my people but unknown to their people. It is merely a device we take for granted but to these remote people I am "god" like. As a scientist I then try to show them it is such a device that anyone could operate but to them I am instructing them to be "god".


The reality is that we do not understand these concepts that Tesla was trying to teach us. Why, because since we can not see this effect with our eyes we have to go by the effects we can see because that is what they teach. We are limited in our view of the world because our own senses are limited. They only capture but a fraction of the reality we live in. But on the other hand humans have the ability to create devices that can translate or bring into our view the effects we can not see.


It is hard to admit that we are limited in that sense. Most will deny we are limited at all. That the only reality is the reality that is. I suspects that this isn't the case since if we use the tools we have we can see a greater range of the reality we live in through our devices. Much like the camera, microscope, special detectors like x-ray and even recently designed gamma ray detectors. Our view is changing because of these devices. There are a great many still out there that say "bah, that is impossible" when the reality of the situation it is not.


My true take on Kapandze is that he devised a way to generate the currents with the 2004 device and then had to devise a way to spread the energy he harvested in the Turkey demo. Both methods being a separate device for a specific problem. One being of generating the energy and the other being a way to distribute that energy to the people.


Like I said I'm gonna start testing his device to generate the currents from what he does show(2004 device). The ground loop is essentially free if it wasn't then ground loops would be very very expensive to the effected system and customer. For which it is not. It is like a hysteresis effect. When used right it can be very very powerful or when ignored or shunned it becomes a problem.


The Turkey video is only a way to show the validity of the Tesla system for the transmission of energy. The 2004 device is the power source and once started, like the flow of the water over the Niagara Falls is capable of generating power for us to use. This was a Tesla concept. And he stated that many many times. Find a source of energy then hook the transmitter to the source to be able to spread it out to any point in the world.

[jbignes5]

 Lets start this investigation by looking at the facts. We know he used two grounds. One from outside (water pipes) and the other being either the house ground or a buried second ground (radiator).


If we look at the Tesla concept we can see the basic receiver as he put it. Picture one, lower right of the picture.

Now the sender is the lower left. The lower left of the picture is the exciter coil. This is the one with the spark gap to limit the current so it does not go into uncontrolled oscillation. We know that we can reduce current flow though this method, commonly called pulsed current or pwm (refined method). This exciter energizes the receiving coil and two voltages appear at each end of the coil. One being lower then the other. This difference allows the grounds to be energized at different values and causes a current loop to form.

Now if we want to harvest current from the loop we must have a coil over the receiving circuit to induce the current from the flow we have created. In order to use the current it must be transformed into AC for our common devices. If you don't want to convert or remake the devices we do use you must chop up the harvested current and put it into a transformer at the proper frequency of 50-60 cycles. This is the reason for the power transistors. Everything else is used to deceive the unknowing observer into thinking it is more complicated then it really is. There is nothing in the box and what is in the can is only the transformer with a cutoff switch for the load. For safety you should not directly use the ground loop as a DC source and it must still be limited by the chopping up that the DC and refinement by the transformer and reconverted to DC if you want to loop it back to the source. If this was not done the loop would destroy the device by melting it, as per my earlier experience of ground loops and it nearly destroying a 3 inch ground service cable.

reference: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ground_loop_(electricity)

When I saw Itsu and the experiment he was using (the Woopy pulser), I thought that was the exciter we needed to stimulate the ground loop into flowing. Maybe thats what was in the plastic box or the blue box. And maybe he used two transistors, one for the exciter and one for the pulsing of the usable AC he needed. To me this sounds like the best option. We know this works because Itsu Got a capacitor to excite and charge up by mere induction from one wire with his system he had put together.

There is nothing magical or even strange happening here. And I hope I have not machine gunned through this. If I have let me know anything you need to understand about this process.

The second picture is my edit of the idea after refinement. There are probably mistakes like the exciter needs to be grounded as well I think. But it seems to be very close to the original idea. I will add links to the videos that I based this off of.

No box version small can housed: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r99g4mjEvTE

I am still working on this diagram. I know now it doesn't match the video exactly and I need to revise it again because the inverter is going into the coils. I still have not gotten this exactly right. The inverted also seems to be powered either by battery or AC... And in either case it can be used at the same time. Also behind the device is the transformer and bridge that is connected to the can.

It seems this diagram I wrote is from the other video that was done outside.

Also the sr193 device does in fact look like the Kapanadze method after seeing the video.

[dllabarre]

Wesley
It has always puzzled me why no one talks about what is hidden in Green Box, In plastic box on top of the 200 watt device you video taped on your trip and inside "can" on 2004 video.  I'm thinking maybe a transmitter is hidden in each of those devices above??
DonL