Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

[Free.Energy]

Guys I don't want to play in some game.


Let 's get common points.
Do you agree with:
1. resonance is required to get OU?
2. Loud can't to have impact on resonance?

1. Resonance is not required
2. many things create loud sounds and they are not proof of resonance

Resonance may just be a means to do something but not a secret element.  I can resonate a flyback coil for HV or use hv transformer.

Look again at the green box device in old video.  You can see what may be two large transistors on top of black box and fan for cooling.  My guess is that this is the driver that feeds flyback for HV.  Many drivers for two transistors. 

Tariel said is Tesla technology and Tesla used pulsed discharge. 

[frantz]

1. Resonance is not required
2. many things create loud sounds and they are not proof of resonance

Resonance may just be a means to do something but not a secret element.  I can resonate a flyback coil for HV or use hv transformer.

Look again at the green box device in old video.  You can see what may be two large transistors on top of black box and fan for cooling.  My guess is that this is the driver that feeds flyback for HV.  Many drivers for two transistors. 

Tariel said is Tesla technology and Tesla used pulsed discharge.

Do you believe in everything that TK said?


Why on this presentation you don't have spark gap...??
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lFiaBKW50yA&feature=player_embedded

Two transistors, can be inverter......, not flyback (maybe)....
We must stop to stay in the same point and thinking about ftybacks.... and about Tesla coils.... what we have? NOTHING.


We see in TK shows only this what TK wants to show us.....
Is not stupid man. He protect his secret...


What I think yet?
I think we can use magnetic field in resonance or electric field, but we must decide in which way we are go and which type of parts we will choose?
Electric and magnetic fields are inseparable... but one of them can be stronger.... ;-)

[JJUK]

@a.king21

I'm afraid this is a subjective question so you may feel unable to answer. Regardless, please would you let us know your thoughts even if this is the case.

Stivep has speculated in the past that TK's patents may prove to be worthless once the operation of his device is known. Having met the man, seen his device and seen his reaction to your enquiries, do you think that he will still be protected once the secret is revealed?

[Free.Energy]

Do you believe in everything that TK said?


Why on this presentation you don't have spark gap...??
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lFiaBKW50yA&feature=player_embedded

Two transistors, can be inverter......, not flyback (maybe)....
We must stop to stay in the same point and thinking about ftybacks.... and about Tesla coils.... what we have? NOTHING.


We see in TK shows only this what TK wants to show us.....
Is not stupid man. He protect his secret...

In the green box device, the inverter is the blue box connected to the battery and later to the can.  Why would he need another inverter?

In the clear box video, the spark rate increases when the load is turned off.  Does the frequency change or the voltage?  We don't know.

In the video link you post above, there is no spark gap and the coil looks like magnet wire.   So much longer wire in this unit.  May with long wire you don't need spark gap.

[frantz]

In the green box device, the inverter is the blue box connected to the battery and later to the can.  Why would he need another inverter?

In the clear box video, the spark rate increases when the load is turned off.  Does the frequency change or the voltage?  We don't know.

In the video link you post above, there is no spark gap and the coil looks like magnet wire.   So much longer wire in this unit.  May with long wire you don't need spark gap.

And so what? we have only questions....
We should start think for themselves.... and see what is invisible