Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

[Hoppy]

Hoppy:  OK maybe you're serious. I'll look at some other shots of the wire. I can assure you that is not the trick. The device was handled many times (and moved around) as well as stared at for 4 and a half hours with 3 of the team very sceptical indeed.
Re the braid.
I do not think it is used as an exact counterweight device. In the build two different coloured braids are roughly tied together.
This proved the point:
1 Kapanadze was struggling to find coax.
2 Different braids do not affect the principle of operation of the device.
3 Braid is very important for his device to work.
4 Possible uses:
A Electrical shielding - thus proving he uses high frequencies and possibly high voltages.
B His device is susceptible to interference from electrical storms - maybe earth, maybe air.
C It is possible he uses braid to make a ... COIL - CAPACITOR!!!
C2 Maybe the coil - capacitor has two different widths to it to make it a permanent dipole....
D He flattens the braid out. Big mistake Tariel.
E Maybe v8karlo's device would be supercharged if he replaced his coils with flat coils made from braid.
F It is equally possible that Kapanadze needs the central wire from the co-ax also.
F2 This would indicate radio frequencies.

OK, lets look at this logically. The camera has picked-up a cable that looks to be running very close to the 'earth' braid. The question that needs to be asked is did any of the team see this cable and if so are there any close-up photographs that can show clearly that it is not in some way connected to the earth braid. If the team observed the cable, it would surely have occurred to them that this could be picked-up in the video and questions asked about it. Like you I cannot see how an investigating team could have missed something like this and not taken the opportunity to record and photograph it, so as to rule it out, given its very close proximity to the device. However, until it is ruled out as being a source of energy to the device, we are left with a nagging possibility that a simple trick was missed by the team.

Hoppy

[Free.Energy]

 Quote from: Free.Energy on August 22, 2012, 03:23:17 PM

>

All of which does not add more energy than you put into it in the first place, so how is it a requirement for an OU system?

 

You make LC circuit that has only R to slow things down. If R is zero it runs forever, remember Tesla experiment with cooled down wire that run for three years. Each cycle is copied to secondary, if no load then LC circuit keeps on running forever. The instant you connect your secondary to load there will be back EMF that opposes LC circuit, resonance is destroyed. Now source sees this and pushes more and power gets used. But if you take this power from secondary so that resonance is not destroyed, your primary LC circuit still runs forever and what ever power this source has circulating you can freely take. Very simple to understand yes ? TK figured this out, so did v8karlo and so did I. Just crank up the frequency and power circulating in the source and energy abundancy is yours, just like Don Smith has said.

I don't think TK uses anythign like this.  Don Smith's stuff has been around for a long time and I don't see any proof r successful replications.  Same goes for the other OU Charletans like Bearden and Bedini.  All the talk of reactive power is deliberately misrepresented to offer excess energy, which it does not.  This only offers increased efficiency.

If you want to compare TK's work to real OU devices then compare it to the devices from Ed Gray, Lester Hendershot, Thomas Moray, and Steven Mark.

[woopy]

Mathematics for Kapanadze:
Of 220 volts through a step-down transformer get 12 volt 3 ​​amp, which translated in watts - 36 watts.
Take the reference voltage 220 ​​volts, and add these 3 amps, we output 660 watts.

Unfortunately I found the inverter transformer output.
Use a step-down transformer to the output 40 volts, as the reference voltage.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hW_KNKVC-DE

Hi Semenihin-77

Thank's for sharing your work

Is it the shematic you are using  in your video?

Can you correct and add some value for the components Please?

Good luck at all

Laurent

[Bernhard]

Hi Bernhard
if it is possible to obtain the measurement of the iron core of the transformer X and Y in this snapshot?
Thanks

Hi x=16mm / y=26mm , the core from a metal tape, from three parts one in another, drew as it looks with the sizes

[sparks]

  Spark gaps not necessary huh.  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electron_avalanche  Why when I look at two capacitor plates seperated by a dielectric do I see the identical description of a spark gap?  What do you think was stinging Tesla back in the first paritcle accelerator ever devised?  What do scientists call fast electrons?  Why did Tesla like so many other scientists with 1/2 an ounce of integrity rail against making metals radioactive while you can make nitrogen radioactive with a 1/2life of 12 seconds.