Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

Started by Pirate88179, June 27, 2009, 04:41:28 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 410 Guests are viewing this topic.

wattsup

@All

Question about the load being a heating element or if the load was a bank of blubs.

As you all have noticed, the spark gap has a definite visual pulsation. Now if the triple transformer was timed to the spark gap, because we all now know the spark gap is on the primary side of the triple transformer, then if the HV output is creating this same pulsation but at a high volts/amps, should we see the heating element pulsate as well. I know if the HV output was timed to the spark gap,and if the load was a bank of bulbs, we should then see those bulbs pulsate. But what about when you use a heating element. If there is a pulsation in the heating element, I am thinking that the element would not have time to react and we would never see that pulsation even though it was present.

So if the spark gap timing is the same as the timing on the tripe transformer primary, then they chose their tank capacitor size to match the best off/on time for the load. If they had only a few bulbs as a load, they could have used a smaller tank capacitor and pulsate faster (faster then we could see) but with less strength. But once you added enough bulbs to equal the watts of the heating element, they would have had to increase the tank capacitor size back to where it was to handle the same load and there we would have seen the bulb pulsating.

Does this sound logical to anyone?

This is important for me to wonder about because this would dictate how the hidden parts of the device would be used in a much simpler manner.

I still have not found a triaxial cable supplier. So now I am more then convince of why TK really needed his wire. They call is coaxial but it it triaxial.

I think his first devices did not have this wire. They must have used similar types of standard coax then gradually migrated to this type because they probably realized it worked the best. Or the best up to now.

wattsup


Free.Energy

So, the TK device does not always start to work straight away and can take up to an day to start working.

This is very interesting.

wattsup

@all

A question about the TKc wire shielding.

When you look at the TKc wires that exit at the top sidewall of the plexiglass, there is an opening in the wire that I showed previously. Is it possible that the TKc wire shielding is connected to the center conductor at that point. This would make the shielding floating at the HV+ side but connected to the end of the coil as it leaves the box. If it is a shielding, to keep in pulses or to keep pules out, it is a containment and maybe he is using that to increase the output as it leaves the coil. This would mean the winding method is not important and only wire length would be a factor. But winding in a  nice coil makes people ask the wrong question. Ahhhhhhhh. Man, I have to stop thinking, but my spiders senses are tingling and I will have to add this to the tests. hehehe

wattsup


frantz

Quote from: 00 on August 28, 2012, 01:51:17 PM
capacitor C2 can be charged either by avramenko or can be pulsed with hvdc through spark gap. the diode must be used after spark gap to pulse charge the cap.

we only have to charge one cap C2 only


Hi friend,
could you show to us some movie with experiment. Not a simulation only real one?
As you see everywhere we have only a theory. ;)
Regards
frantz

verpies

Quote from: 00 on August 28, 2012, 01:15:22 PM
Kapanadze Free Energy Ac Generator.pdf (100.49 kB - downloaded 155 times.)

Aren't you forgetting that two capacitors after voltage equalization collectively possess only half the energy of the single capacitor before voltage equalization?

If C1=C2 , then:

Energy in capacitors before voltage equalization:
E1A=½C1*0 =0
E2A=½C2V2


Energy in capacitors after voltage equalization:
E1B=½C1(½V)2
E2B=½C2(½V)2

Thus:
E1B+E2B=½E2A