Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

[xenomorphlabs]

I assume that with "He" you relate to Don Smith in your first section, because you did not specifically say who you are talking about.
It seems as if you seem to misunderstand a few things.

1 disturbing the magnetic field and make it oscillate with high frequency and low voltage.
  because high voltage consumes energy- he says current  is the way to go.
  the frequency should be high like 20Mhz - the frequency is instead of high voltage.

Why does he use Neon Power Supplies of 3000-9000 Volt and steps that up to many 10.000s Volts if he had ever said that?
I have studied all D. Smith material and he always talks about high voltage, high frequency. So you did misunderstand something.

3 electrons can separate, they consist of a larger part and smaller part, one for current and one for voltage - (new idea for me - sound strange but possible- all the strange beta particles i don't know about them)

Smith talks about the different spin directions here and not beta particles.

5 you can build coils for current and for voltage (double wire coil- one wire electricity flows in one direction , the other wire electricity flows the other direction, and so you can cancel the voltage and left with just current, you can do it half way, and so get different coil voltage current ratios )

You might mean a serial bifilar which would cancel the magnetic field.
The voltage cancelled? Without voltage there would be no current ?!
All standard transformers are experiencing a coupling between the windings.
High current transformers have usually low voltages (like welding transformers), but there is no gain of power automatically when you have a high current output.

Don Smith Said that in order to convert electrons to usable form you have to make the electrons different from the background.
also he said that the lowest losses are in high frequency. and you can duplicate the magnetic resonance,
because the losses are on electricity and not on magnetism.
he puts something inside ferrite to make something different from background.
and he uses high frequency to have low losses and to create background noise.
to make only magnetic resonance coil you wire coils with two wires both as it was a one wire (just band in half and spool)
the voltage cancels itself the magnetic is not. also he said you want some voltage so it means probably that the resonant coils are half double wire, the other half is normal, all from same wire(he stops spooling the second wire somewhere in the middle and then just spools one wire)., maybe one half of a wire is in the ferite and thats creates the flow.

Don Smith uses mostly aircore transformers, there is even a chapter in his documents called "Resonant aircore transformer". No mention of ferrite anywhere. He does use magnetostrictive materials for the dipole set-ups
like metglas.

Kapanadze and Don Smith are always being so closely related to each other, yet do they make use of quite different phenomena in their devices.

[sparks]

 Electrons in high energy orbitals are moving as fast as 1/6 the speed of light.  This is of course  over a very small distance.  Still this is mass in motion.  The electron has to be a storehouse of momentum otherwise it could not exist.  The gravity and electrostatic attraction of the proton would cause it to annihalate on the surface of the massive proton and create a neutron.  This is not the case hense the electron has angular and orbital momentum.  The question is does the photon energy needed to excite an atom into free state exceed the amount of photon energy emitted by the electron in a collisionless current.

[grizli]

@Baroutologos
I always get a kick out of your posts, there is no need to prove you wrong as you have managed to do this quite well all by yourself . Have you ever wondered why Kapanadze seems to have no problem producing hundreds of kilowatts yet you cannot even produce 1 watt? It is easy to blame or condemn others for your own failures but it is quite another to admit that you may be doing something wrong. Your objections and challenges cannot change the fact that Kapanadze is very successful and you are not, maybe if we want to be successful we will have to put our ego's aside and say the words---"I do not know everything".
Here is a crazy thought-- We know and can say for certain that each and every time an electric current flows on our primary or secondary we produce massive losses-- so why do we keep doing it over and over and over? This would seem to be like the man who keeps touching a hot burner to see if it is hot, over and over and over, and always getting burned.
Regards
AC

Again phylosopher 

where is PROVE Kapanadze is succesfull
where is prove SR is sucessfull

[grizli]

@Cap z pro.
. I respect your view.

Anyway, back to workbench.

In responce to Admin's request, i made some  experiments with my 10-ferrite put-together-core of having two windings.
Winding A of 133uH inductunce is wired to a little magnetic quenched spark-gap and 50nF capacitor that is charge to a couple Kv.

Winding B of 35-40uH is connected to a variable inductor (actually i made three just in case) of 15-40uH variable inductune with one or two insertable AM radio cores and a 125nf cap, thus achieving resonant reception to the load being two lamps of nominal 21watts each at 12volt. (5 ohm resistance at nominal light)

As the pictures clearly illustrate the power reception is max when the receiving LC is set to resonance (tuning of the load LC to pulsing LC).

EDIT: By the way, by solo applying the load without any receiving LC the efficiency is far better.

is this single wire transmission or ?

[grizli]

I am sorry for the obscurity. Below are the component values tested.
Same power level voltage levels (spark-gap length) and load for both experiments.

ps: You are welcomed!

Neglect post above.. I still dont see option how to delete post

but it is still transofrmer ..
thats not what tesla made

reciever and transmitter must have any magnetic coupling just capacitive coupling .. hmm
Put secondary capacitor parallel to reciever coil not in series with load