Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

[wattsup]

@all

OK, regarding the spark gap, let's look at it logically.

From my own trials with spark gaps, I have found that voltage is required but for the spark gap to be in series with a load it will have to have great amperage as well. You cannot create both while having your open air spark gap remain almost silent. For the spark gap to be in series or parallel to the load, and for the energy to run both the spark and the load, your spark would be making sounds of hard crackling. There is no other way for you to do that.

I say what we have seen in the 2004 video is enough. Unit worked without spark.

Then go to the Aq2 device, unit works with spark gap of irrelevant frequency completely isolated via a circuit inside the hidden section and way before the output going to load.  So the gap is isolated and is probably there to create confusion and distraction.

The spark in the 2004 video is weak and can be generated using any very small HV coil with 50 Hz pulses or any frequency up to 30kH. Does not matter. The gap itself is so close that anything around 2kv would jump that with no problem and the total energy required would be a few watts. See here for some small HV transformers;
http://www.amazing1.com/transformers.htm

If you need such a weak and narrow spark for pulsing, then why have two heat sinked transistors?

Regarding the Tin Can itself being metal, this presents some isolation challenges. Consider the looping transformer used in the GreenBox video and how they used simple cardboard to keep it isolated fro its metal box. They would have to use the same type of isolation in the Tin Can and possible have components inside the can in two or three layers, bottom, center and top and maybe by mapping the level were the wires enter the tin can we can separate these layers into logical areas of operation via bundling the wires into groups.

Also, we seem to forget that the spark did occur when the inverter was turned on and he plugged the back plug into the wall socket. So some of the AC5 power could have driving a small HV coil right there via two series resistors. If the battery was low enough, those two series resistors could have prevented the spark and this is why he used the back plug to increase input until the device took over itself. No big deal to produce the spark and it is way to weak to have any effect on 1000 watts of output power.

The spark gap was their way of knowing if the unit was ready to start lighting the bulbs. If the spark held when he took off the back plug, then the device was ready. Proof is when the spark was not present, they gambled on turning on the device output and hoped for the best, pretending that the spark was present. So spark or no spark, the device works. They could have used a simple indicator light but what fun is that when a spark gap does the same thing but creates a millions times more mystique and questioning.

Now consider the 5 1/2 turns Fat Coil being in series with such a weak spark will produce nothing and assist in now way to produce the final output since we know that the two TKc winds, orange and white are passing some 1000 watts of output, that fat coil is doing nothing with its 5 1/2 turns but to create mental operational gridlock.

Havoc is not resonance. Resonance is weak, havoc is strong. Now if you had two transistors that were in parallel but had slightly varying lengths of lead wires connecting them to the same primary, what would the effect be? Would you have a "slight" delay in one transistor versus the other when pulsing the primary of a coil. I know that with AC, if you are slightly out of phase this becomes a havoc condition that transformers and motors really do not like.

wattsup

[Zeitmaschine]

Сapacitors are connected to the primary coil, not secondary coils.

Can't see any capacitor on Kapanadze's primary coil. It is connected directly to the inverter.

High voltage winding can be wound on the same transformer in the tin can.

But not high voltage with high frequency. The spark looks like a high frequency spark not 50Hz.

Anyway, why is a transformer needed to get resonance? Wouldn't a simple choke be sufficient also?

If anyone has any other explanation that agree with the videos and the patents then I'm all ears.

When the energy producing device consists only of a simple transformer and a capacitor, then how to patent such a thing? But on the other hand when investors demand that a patent is filed then a piece of good advice is needed. Could it be that the piece of good advice was to come up with a patent that is almost complete fabrication, only to have something filed at all?

All what is understandable in the patent (actually two patents) is that there are two coils in the device, once started the device can produce electric energy to run a load and it can feed itself with this energy. All the rest seems to be just gibberish.

[bass]

I also think that the spark is not needed.
Then it turns out that the entire coil is a fraud. It just rolled coil wire.

Regards

[xenomorphlabs]

If you need such a weak and narrow spark for pulsing, then why have two heat sinked transistors?

To create a simple spark a single transistor would be enough.
The fact that there is two of them points to a symmetry-requiring application, most likely
the generation of a sinusoid waveform for some kind of inverter using Class-B pushâ€"pull amplifier transistor set-up.
Due to the relative inefficiency of Class-B you do need heatsinks, because a lot of heat is produced.
At some point TK needs an inverter if he's got AC on the output.

[27Bubba]

I also think that the spark is not needed.
Then it turns out that the entire coil is a fraud. It just rolled coil wire.

Regards

So maybe the whole setup consist of just a transformer connected to toroidal coil in the can, couple diodes and a capacitor?
In could possible a bifilar coil is placed in the can?
By looking carefully at TK coils one thing stands out, they are wound different from each other..