Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

Started by Pirate88179, June 27, 2009, 04:41:28 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 128 Guests are viewing this topic.

Farmhand

Quote from: jbignes5 on October 01, 2012, 09:12:10 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qtI1CPBSm-o&feature=related


Hmmm...

Very dodgy video, the guy is trying to measure AC with a DC amp meter that may not even be connected. He didn't show it working.
He says he has resonance but all he has is an AC wave form produced by the function generator and distorted by the coil, it doesn't look resonant to me.
The frequency is 300 kHz which the meter would probably ignore anyway.
The LED uses extremely small amounts of power as well.

Bottom line is the demo shows nothing but his inexperience and his desire to show something as "free energy".
My hat is off to him for experimenting and trying, but I see nothing special in the video.

Cheers

bass

Quote from: Zeitmaschine on October 01, 2012, 07:20:27 PM
TK's frequency is fixed at 50Hz. In order to maintain the resonance we have to change the coil or the capacitor or the rotation of the earth or whatsoever but not the frequency. :o

In the video of the 2004 Kapanadze not measure frequency. So we can not say that there is 50 Hz. If the transistors assembled generator, while in 2004, the frequency may be more. If the frequency is greater then the transformer can be much smaller and fit into a tin can.

It may be that high frequency can be modulated at a frequency of 50 Hz. But this is theory

Jack Noskills

The very first circuit I tested nearly two years ago was such that it sucked power from the ground. Ground point was significant as it did its thing only from certain location. Effect was that there was no change on input side but the sparks went wild. First sound was the usual rattling you get at 50 Hz. When ground was connected sound changed into whirling sound and I was amazed by it. I discovered it by accident when I played with caps, my finger touched the circuit via caps metallic casing. Later I got also shock from the ground, felt like a hefty handshake ripping my arm off. But did not know how to use this power without losing the effect. Later on I realised that maybe I should have put a trafo in the ground connection to take power from it, or use it to run second similar circuit. Did not try it though, I think there would need to be higher frequency source so it would suck power faster, and perhaps also put a capacitor. I once tried to replicate it using GDT as spark gap but it did not work so I quess it has to be open air spark.

br549 experiment reminded me of this so I thought I should post the circuit. Below falstad simulation, it does not show the effect but it is easier to draw. I used grid power and low power stepup trafo first to get 440 volts, this is not shown in the sim. I used iron trafo in the circuit, it had maybe 9 meters of wire per coil. I tested also using thinner wire, 165 ohms DC resistance so it would have much bigger induction effect, but it was not better. Now that I understand capacitive induction, for best results bifilar coil should be used here instead of separate coils.

The sim shows two spark gaps and two grounds. Both locations worked, but did not test using them at the same time. It also worked with one spark and ground. I omitted resistors for coils from the picture for clarity.

Below link needs to be combined into one line

http://www.falstad.com/circuit/#%24+1+5.0E-6+0.9891409633455756+50+5.0+43%0Av+240+240+240+272+0+1+50.0+400.0+0.0+0.0+0.5%0AT+320+240+384+304+0+
0.1+1.0+1.6609977282477928E-16+0.30806814650717984+0.999%0A187+320+304+320+352+0+1000.0+1.0E9+220.0+0.0010%0A187+384+304+384+352+0+1000.0+1.0E9+
220.0+0.0010%0Ag+384+304+432+304+0%0Aw+384+352+320+352+0%0Aw+320+352+240+352+0%0Aw+240+352+240+272+0%0Aw+352+128+240+128+0%0Aw+240+240+240+128+
0%0Ag+320+304+272+304+0%0Ad+352+128+384+240+1+0.805904783%0Ad+320+240+352+128+1+0.805904783%0A

or if you know how to import:

$ 1 5.0E-6 0.9891409633455756 50 5.0 43
v 240 240 240 272 0 1 50.0 400.0 0.0 0.0 0.5
T 320 240 384 304 0 0.1 1.0 1.6609977282477928E-16 0.30806814650717984 0.999
187 320 304 320 352 0 1000.0 1.0E9 220.0 0.0010
187 384 304 384 352 0 1000.0 1.0E9 220.0 0.0010
g 384 304 432 304 0
w 384 352 320 352 0
w 320 352 240 352 0
w 240 352 240 272 0
w 352 128 240 128 0
w 240 240 240 128 0
g 320 304 272 304 0
d 352 128 384 240 1 0.805904783
d 320 240 352 128 1 0.805904783

Below example how to connect two circuits in cascade. When power is taken via trafo that has the lamp, more power gets sucked in the circuit causing more intense sparks to occur. Sounds similar to TK device. But first someone needs to replicate one circuit.

verpies

Quote from: a.king21 on October 01, 2012, 06:24:16 PM
I challenge both you and verpies to prove your statement mathematically with reference to Tesla's portable earthquake machine. Let's say his "tapping" machine consumed 10 watts. How many watts would it take to shake a building 100 meters high by 100 meters long by 20 meters deep to the point where let's say 20 workmen were panicking, convinced they were in an earthquake?
The mechanical resonance or LC resonance has been worked out completely since the 19th century. There is no energy gain in it - just accumulation and storage (most often with loss over time, a.k.a. dampening).
I will not repeat the equations on Wikipedia here. You can find them here and here.

The Q of the building is so low that a 10W tapper cannot break through the dampening effect of the construction. To shake it like that, MW would be required.

So the artificial earthquake story is fake or it was accomplished via other means than mechanical resonance.

P.S.
Watch Mytbusters. One of their episode busted the myth that a lock-stepped army platoon can resonate a bridge to destruction (wind - yes, boots - no) and in another episode they tried to shake a building and a bridge with a "tapper" like Tesla did allegedly - it did not work.

xenomorphlabs

Quote from: Jack Noskills on October 03, 2012, 03:50:13 AM
The very first circuit I tested nearly two years ago was such that it sucked power from the ground.
Did you make measurements to come to the conclusion that power was addded to the system?
How did you measure?
Regards