Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

[verpies]

High voltage in oil?

All it would do is increase the dielectric breakdown voltage.
Beneficial for capacitance - meaningless for inductance.

[verpies]

What i like most is all that NMR talk which requires strong magnetic fields which you don't get from a non inductive tensor coil with a brass core ...

NMR does not reqiure a strong magnetic field.
In fact, NMR occurs even in the very low Earth's magnetic field. It even has a name: EFNMR

Why do you keep rejecting NMR as the working principle, mentioned by yfree, is beyond understanding.
Do you prefer the mysterious originless energy from "the ambient" or the aether?
I don't think that the definition of OU requires an originless energy source - all that's needed for OU is that energy Output / Input > 1.

Even the construction of the newest Dally's device is in line with the NMR explanation - this time the ns pulses generate the dense comb of frequencies needed for stimulating NMR. 
NMR is also the underlying principle of the apparently successful Yoke device - as now understood by Arunas/Antanas/Wesley.

The only obvious flaw in McFreey's paper the radial direction of flux density gradient - a small mistake that's easily corrected.

[yfree]

...
The only obvious flaw in McFreey's paper is the radial direction of flux density gradient - a small mistake that's easily corrected.

Why do you consider the radial field gradient a flaw?
It is present in the spool type device. I verified it experimentally.
McFreey does not say it is necessary, only that it may actually help, not disturb.

[verpies]

Why do you consider the radial field gradient a flaw?
It is present in the spool type device. I verified it experimentally.
McFreey does not say it is necessary, only that it may actually help, not disturb.

Oh, the radial flux density gradient exists, all right - it's just in the opposite direction.
I verified it experimentally, too.

The way it is analyzed in the paper is flawed.
I agree that the two parallel disks can be conceptually decomposed into many concentric cylinders.
However I stop agreeing when it is written that a magnetic flux distributed over the crossectional area of a larger cylinder leads to a greater flux density than the same flux distributed over a smaller area. of a smaller cylinder... and that is without considering the effect of the extra reluctance that the flux has to travel to get from the central magnet to the more outer cylinders.

[Zeitmaschine]

These articles do not say that this device produces free energy, quite the contrary.
Also, there is no statement that the device can be sold on eBay or even that it is useful for any particular purpose.

That's exactly the problem here: The TK device produces Free Energy, it could be sold on eBay and it is useful for a particular purpose.

But currently the most »useful« feature of the TK device is to make the number of pages of this thread go higher and higher.