Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

[Zeitmaschine]

The four diodes are in parallel. There are two connected by the top copper strip. That's where one side of the secondary iron wire goes to that copper strip (left). Then there are two more iron wires that go from the copper strip to the two other diodes at their top pins.

I'm not sure about that. Maybe my graphics program does not serve me well, but I can see a long wire coming from the transformer's secondary (left) that goes below the copper strip to diode No. 4 (should be insulated because it touches diode No. 2) and a second wire that goes form the copper strip (which connects diode No. 1 and No. 2) to diode No. 3 and a wire (marked with a circle) that seems also connected to the transformers secondary (right). Except these two wires (marked white and blue) I can't see any other wires on top of the diode plate. Hence this leads to a very strange connection method of these four diodes.

On the other hand, if the diodes No. 1, 2 and 3 are connected in parallel (top and bottom) and diode No. 4 is connected as single diode then this would equal a total of only two diodes effective. And as a strange coincidence in the Stepanov patent there are only two diodes indicated.

Hence could it be that three paralleled diodes are connected in parallel to the transformer's secondary (like Stepanov's choke)? But how to get OU out of a (half wave) short-circuit secondary? Furthermore I can't see a connection going anywhere from the the three connected diodes top pins.

Any ideas are welcome ...

[Farmhand]

Wattsup, Radiant energy does not necessarily have anything to do with High voltage spikes. When I turn on my radiant heater it emits radiant energy which has absolutely nothing whatsoever to do with HV spikes. Radiant energy is energy that is radiated out of a system in all directions. "radiation" the HV spikes people call radiant energy are just HV spikes,
they remain in the system that they were created in. Most HV spikes talked about here are caused by the release of energy from the magnetic field of coils, which is energy from the supply, and is emf not back emf as well. These spikes never leave the system that created them, unless they are captured by an unconnected circuit then it might be radiant energy if the receiving circuit is not in an inductive relationship with the sending circuit.

Cheers

[MileHigh]

I have always viewed this thread as a "make work" project for posters.  lol

What I do know from experience is that the majority, I would even say the vast majority, of free energy experimenters do not understand how coils work and where the voltage spikes come from.  You end up with a "cult of 'radiant energy'" where people mistakenly equate voltage spikes generated by a coil with 'radiant energy.'  Bedini has been using this falsehood to create a buzz about everything he does.

A.king21 is just one in a very very long line of free energy experimenters that believe that they are working with 'radiant energy' when they have coils in their circuits and observe voltage spikes.  They create an imaginary belief system around the false ideas of 'radiant energy' and 'cold electricity.'  There is no such thing as 'cold electricity' it's just silly to even use the term.  But I am fully aware that many experimenters around here use that term in all seriousness.

Here is a statement to ponder:  The reason a coil might generate a voltage spike is dependent on the load on the coil.

Now, I am willing to bet that this concept has never even entered the minds of the majority of people on this thread (I don't read it so I am just guessing), and the majority of the people on this thread don't really understand what I just said.

There is an implicit challenge here to all of you Tariel Kapanadze fans:  If you want to play with these circuits and understand how they work, and understand what you are actually looking at when you probe them with your oscilloscope probe, then you have to understand how coils work.

I know a lot of you will be dismissive of learning the 'classical' explanation for how a coil works.  But that's kind of an oxymoron, how can you be dismissive of something if you don't even understand what you are supposed to be dismissing?

The truth is that the conventional understanding of how a coil works will explain all of the voltage spikes and everything.  To your shock and surprise, what you thought was 'unconventional' in your circuits will turn out to all be conventional - if you can get to the level of understanding where you actually understand how a coil works.

Perhaps if you pool your thoughts together you will get it.  Not to pick on A.king21 at all, but the problem if people that think like him dominate the thread and throw around all of the 'radiant energy' catch phrases, you guys will be spinning your wheels and this thread will grow to 2000, 3000, or even 5000 pages and you will still be spinning your wheels.

So where do the voltage spikes come from?  In an ideal world you all would understand that and not even give it a second thought.

[a.king21]

Terminology.

By radiant energy I mean pulsing the circuit on and off. The faster the better. The more amps the better.
This causes a 220v circuit to produce (say) 5 kv spikes. These spikes then have to be controlled as if they were high voltage. That's my big breakthrough and contribution.
Now if you look at TK's circuits with this information you will find it all makes sense.
In Tesla's time many operatives were killed when they switched on the mains power station supplies. They worked with ohms law, Faraday's law and all the other laws. These did not supply the answer.

[xenomorphlabs]

Good weapon against 'operatives' then, right?
But joke aside. I don't consider it unusual that a man gets killed who operates the switch and stands too close. In those times the operators have not followed
protection procedures, if they even already existed. You wouldn't find alike switches in modern facilities for a reason.
The voltage rises at the first moments of circuit closed and thus the "gap distance" to discharge to ground majorly increases in that moment and when the voltage reaches
100 kV, it  can easily kill a man 1m next to the insufficiently isolated switch circuit, but just in that moment of course, because the voltage curve steeply falls after that.
What electric law does not supply the answer to that? None.