Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

Started by Pirate88179, June 27, 2009, 04:41:28 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 172 Guests are viewing this topic.

baroutologos

In continuation of my experimentation with resonance concepts and specificaly using a transmiter and several receivers (eccentric transformer theory etc) , i utilized my Solid State Tesla coil (Kacher) and assembled 2 similar in all aspects receivers.

All have 75mm PVC core, 0.5mm enameled wire, same technic tightly wound, 580mm height, inductunce 10.94 mH with same LC meter and same topload.

Minor deviations in resonance exist (as proven later) due to infitesimal differences between the coils.

...
I used my Kacher to pulse the transmiter resonator at 100watt power and 30watt.
both receivers having same low turns coil for applying the load (45watt, 12v bulb) were possitioned in various radii from transmiter and played with un-evened loads at each receiver.
Bottom of receivers for manifesting resonance were both grounded.

...
Findings:

After experimenting several hours (my head almost fried) and in various possitions and loads i can clearly see how the main resonator's energy is distributed between them.
If one gets loaded upon a certain degree the other gets weaker. There is a "sweet spot" in applying a combination of distancing and load, but in all cases the overall effect is 60% of power used max.
With one receiver the efficiency is lesser.

I cannot perceive any reason why with 10 receivers (assuming had enough space) anyone should expect OU. But the more, the higher the efficiency transfered.
In all cases, the transmitter (unless receiver is brought quite close) remains unaffected in consumption terms.

When goin down in transmitter power (30watts) receiver power diminished linearly as expected.
I managed to attain a wireless power transfer of 30-40% efficiency at 1,5-2m. Better Q resonators would have better results of course.

conclusion
...
Mine conclusion is this is a fun yet lossy procedure.

xenomorphlabs

One post on 001-lab states: "Elf and (Crazy) Alex, is the same person. ...". Not much details are actually revealed about Elf´s device.
Dont know if its BS , maybe it works in its own way, but as you can see he the transistor part feeds 3 wires into the coil and in Kapis and SRs there is only 1 wire coming off the transistor part.
Therefore it does not correlate exactly to SR´s device, but as i said maybe it works somehow.

EDIT: 2 wires are at the same potential though coming from the emitters, that would make it 2 wires (maybe split in the coil) going to the coil.
On the pic of SR´s device it nearly looks though as if the emitters are only connected to each other.

sparks

@bart

  Is the transmitter tower grounded.  Nice work.
Think Legacy
A spark gap is cold cold cold
Space is a hot hot liquid
Spread the Love

baroutologos

@Xeno,

I was thinking about the Spanish replicator that says the iron pipe core produced far better effect than ferrites. Perhaps, assuming this is true, then instead of ferrites by utilizing a iron pipe, then core saturation or 0.5T magnetic flux is far more easier to be atained than thick ferrite walled coil than in order to achieve 0.5T or so a far greater power is needed that way.

What you think?