Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

Started by Pirate88179, June 27, 2009, 04:41:28 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 457 Guests are viewing this topic.

Hoppy

Quote from: jbignes5 on January 31, 2013, 01:07:34 PM

Ok you use the word current.. What does that mean to you? How is current initiated?

In my world current is initiated from a potential difference. Because potentials like to equalize when a path is put between them, this action is deemed current. Current is potential satified or equalized. What current is, is the issue here. What is moving so that potentials can be equal?
This goes into matter and what it is. From my understanding matter is bound charge. It is bound by matter and held into that charge by the capacity of that binding. These charges are highly mobile and the only influencing of that charge is by the electric field. Unbound charges are free to mobilize in a very short time. This is the effect of corona discharges. The potential is fulfilled by charges that are attracted to the potential. The charges move so fast that they create light in the process causing the effect we see in a corona discharge. Since matter has mobile charges bound inside of it they can move as well but it takes more potential to move the charges out of that binding container of matter. When it is taken from the matter it creates a vacuum. This vacuum sucks that charges back in when available.
So Tesla was right about the expanding baloon analogy. Pull out charges and let it snap back via vacuum and it will create an oscillation of that baloon. A baloon might not be the right analogy though. Lets say the baloon is thicker and in the original state it is say 10 cm across. Suck out some air and the thick baloon resists this extraction and causes a vacuum. Release the orifice that you used to suck the air out and it will suck in air to bring it back to it's rested state. But as we all know it will overshoot and draw in a slight more air to become pressurized and it will then release that air back out and over shoot again sucking in less and less air as the cycles continue. The maximum solution is to periodically suck on the baloon every in and out motion for a complete cycle or to tap the swing every in and out cycle. This is a rather bad analogy but you get the Idea I hope.

One experiment that I think related fundamentally to this is the crystal battery. We are using matter and it's different forms to create a flow of current through a highly crystalline form of matter. This crystalline form of matter creates a diode of sorts when first formed. We use two metals of dissimular makeup that have a difference of potential. This biases the crystalline diode on and allows a current of one way to form through the battery. As you draw charges from one material to the other each plate becomes balanced and the flow eventually stops but given enough time for the matter to reguage back to it's normal and the flow will continue. This has been experimentally verified on this forum.

Yes, potential difference is the generally accepted initiator of current. However, we are digressing from the core issue, that is how did TK create a potential difference for free in his devices, such that some believe that his devices ran overunity. My belief is that his potential difference was derived from a grid supply which he made every effort to conceal from his audiences. Tesla also used copious amounts of grid power for his high voltage experiments but never concealed this fact!

jbignes5

Quote from: Hoppy on January 31, 2013, 02:07:51 PM
Yes, potential difference is the generally accepted initiator of current. However, we are digressing from the core issue, that is how did TK create a potential difference for free in his devices, such that some believe that his devices ran overunity. My belief is that his potential difference was derived from a grid supply which he made every effort to conceal from his audiences. Tesla also used copious amounts of grid power for his high voltage experiments but never concealed this fact!

Well if we could come up with a way to adress what potential difference = what maximum current this could be worked out. At first TK used a battery to devolp this potential difference in the back yard version. This battery is removed after the process is started. This mean somehow there is enough current in the device once started that it could be looped back into the battery portion that is now absent to run the device. How this is done isn't very clear because he hides a great many things from our sight.

 
I myself think it is the special isolation transformer and diode bridge he puts in place of the battery to feed the inverter. The reasoning is sound though. The special transformer was said to be a split inner magnetic core and special winding technique. How that works I'm not entirely clear about but I think it might have a lot to do with bifilar winding methods.

If the high voltage field is oriented in such a way and from the heavy copper coils geometry when compared to the ground cable going inside of it, it looks like a screw type geometry. The coil pumps the end of the ground wire to lend the charges inside of the grounds matter to the system. These charges are then pulled into the system and induce a heavy current in the interior coil which is the load coil then shunted back to ground through the load. This means it is phase shifted and reballanced as it shunts to the ground. Could that be right? Hmmm.. Lets look at a closed loop of wire in a special way like this:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eH2TWPJiwEA

Let the video play out and they will show you how it is made.

The wire loop going through the coil and cores is a straight wire loop... kinda the same process for the charge pumping action I think is going on in the TK ground wire. You could think of this as a source of charges being sucked up a straw(wire).

Hoppy

Quote from: jbignes5 on January 31, 2013, 03:03:35 PM

Well if we could come up with a way to adress what potential difference = what maximum current this could be worked out. At first TK used a battery to devolp this potential difference in the back yard version. This battery is removed after the process is started. This mean somehow there is enough current in the device once started that it could be looped back into the battery portion that is now absent to run the device. How this is done isn't very clear because he hides a great many things from our sight.

 
I myself think it is the special isolation transformer and diode bridge he puts in place of the battery to feed the inverter. The reasoning is sound though. The special transformer was said to be a split inner magnetic core and special winding technique. How that works I'm not entirely clear about but I think it might have a lot to do with bifilar winding methods.

If the high voltage field is oriented in such a way and from the heavy copper coils geometry when compared to the ground cable going inside of it, it looks like a screw type geometry. The coil pumps the end of the ground wire to lend the charges inside of the grounds matter to the system. These charges are then pulled into the system and induce a heavy current in the interior coil which is the load coil then shunted back to ground through the load. This means it is phase shifted and reballanced as it shunts to the ground. Could that be right? Hmmm.. Lets look at a closed loop of wire in a special way like this:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eH2TWPJiwEA

Let the video play out and they will show you how it is made.

The wire loop going through the coil and cores is a straight wire loop... kinda the same process for the charge pumping action I think is going on in the TK ground wire. You could think of this as a source of charges being sucked up a straw(wire).

I've seen this demonstrated a few times and done it myself. The inner copper tube (or copper spiral) can be pulled from the ferrite rings and so long as a length of metal rod or wire is through the copper, the load lamp will still light. I've not seen a good explanation for this but I have not found its an OU effect, as there is always sufficient energy available from the signal generator to energise the lamp from my experiments. Nonetheless, its interesting and something that needs further study, as it could form the basis of TK's devices, assuming of course that they are not faked by powering direct from a grid supply.

jbignes5

Quote from: Hoppy on January 31, 2013, 03:37:30 PM
I've seen this demonstrated a few times and done it myself. The inner copper tube (or copper spiral) can be pulled from the ferrite rings and so long as a length of metal rod or wire is through the copper, the load lamp will still light. I've not seen a good explanation for this but I have not found its an OU effect, as there is always sufficient energy available from the signal generator to energise the lamp from my experiments. Nonetheless, its interesting and something that needs further study, as it could form the basis of TK's devices, assuming of course that they are not faked by powering direct from a grid supply.

I didn't say it was free energy. It's just part of the process. Think of the wire loop being the ground wire. It would still create a movement of the charges in the ground up through the device. This was my only reference to it really as it shows that a stright wire through a coil will allow a movement through that wire. If the cores don't actually suck up the magnetic component what is allowing the transfer of the energy to the straight wire. Both the inside and the outside of the coil in the case of my example is effectivel shielded by the magnetic cores. So whats allowing the transfer then?

If we now take this example and look for the simularities you'll see that the ground wire in TK's backyard video is that straight wire. Without the cores you will see that it still runs as shown. So this means it can pull the charges from the ground up through the coils via stimulation of the heavy copper high voltage coils around the device. The load coil is the reciever of the magnetic fields created and induce a heavy current in the load coils I am betting. Since the heavy copper coil is pulsed with the HV this creates a vacuum to the charges. So it sucks them up and lets them go back down the ground cable. This will create a heavy magnetic field that changes and can be harvested by the load coil. The load coil is attached to both the load and isolation transformer(with diode bridge) which can run the inverter on it's own loop. This splits the input from the output and should run the device without input aka battery to inverter.

Hoppy

Quote from: jbignes5 on January 31, 2013, 04:36:04 PM

So it sucks them up and lets them go back down the ground cable. This will create a heavy magnetic field that changes and can be harvested by the load coil. The load coil is attached to both the load and isolation transformer(with diode bridge) which can run the inverter on it's own loop. This splits the input from the output and should run the device without input aka battery to inverter.

This is a nice theory but IMO a big assumption to make, that as far as I'm aware has not been reliably demonstrated, certainly not by TK.