Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

[Zeitmaschine]

http://ericdollard.com

Where can I find Eric Dollard's free energy device?

In the meantime something most interesting: The Self-Exciting Joule Thief

Once started the circuit runs just on two 1000µF capacitors (if I'm right). Hence I have made a quick check: Connected a 1000µF capacitor to a 22KΩ resistor in parallel (like R4 and R5 in the diagram) and charged it with 12.4 volts. After exactly 60 seconds the resistor has drained the voltage below 0.7 volts. That means with 2000µF the circuit should run a max. of two minutes before the voltage goes below the bias voltage that a transistor (TIP120 is actually Darlington) needs to switch. Then I have connected one(!) LED in series with the 22KΩ resistor. After two minutes the voltage is down to 2.5 volts and stays there (forward bias of the LED) and the LED does not emit light anymore. So as it seems something unusual is going on here because in the video the circuit runs clearly more than two minutes (1:18 to 5:21). Even more unusual since the start voltage given in the diagram is only 6 volts.

Any comments why this nevertheless could be in accordance with all known laws of physics?

[verpies]

Where can I find Eric Dollard's free energy device?

I don't know

In the meantime something most interesting: The Self-Exciting Joule Thief

Yes, it is much more interesting than unsubstantiated theory.
I see no errors in your analysis of it. 
Was "EM energy harvesting" from ambient fields eliminated already?
What about some energy being delivered from the scope or meters.  Does it still work if all external leads are removed?

[Zeitmaschine]

I don't know
Yes, it is much more interesting than unsubstantiated theory.
I see no errors in your analysis of it. 
Was "EM energy harvesting" from ambient fields eliminated already?
What about some energy being delivered from the scope or meters.  Does it still work if all external leads are removed?

No error in my analysis? Then I will try to hand in an error so nothing is missing here: What could happen if a capacitor is charged with DC (continuous flow of electrons) but discharged in very short pulses? Is the amount of energy in and out then still balanced? Or could it be that a capacitor has the ability to regenerate itself somehow between two very short pulses? So to say the discharge pulses are too short to be noticed by the capacitor (or battery)? If so (but I'm afraid it is not so) then this would mean when a capacitor is charged with less but longer pulses and discharged with more but shorter pulses then perhaps this could give additional energy.

No, no, it can't be that simple, so forget about this idea.

[verpies]

There is the "dielectric soak" in electrolytic capacitors but it could not account for so much discharge energy.
It is much more likely that the external leads are picking sth up.

[cheappower2012]

TO all,
I decided to create a simulation of Tk's
closed loop 2004 video,my simulations are working
simulations
a computer simlation with coventional software simulates a working circuit
where overunity does not exist.A lot of these kinds of simulations I have done over
the years
to simulate tpu operation to show if something is feasible or not a lot of my stuff
is never posted.
Theres been a lot of talk as to weither TK's device is real or a good trick.In this
simulation I
threw a bunch of things togeither.The old inverter was bought on e-bay,it was used
in some tpu experiments
its been modified,a simple circuit consisting of diodes,resistors and a transformer
form the drive circuit,I didn't create
this for effectivness
only to show how if you had a device that produced overunity it could be looped,the same way TK does.
I used a adjustable transformer to to get 12 volt vdc thru a bridge rectifier,I'm using a
100 watt inverter,and a 12 volt lead/acid to start it.Now remember this is a simulation,energy is applied
to the modified inverter,thru a 12 volt power supply,my other battery went dead.Now at the end,when I remove the ac from the inverter
the light goes out very fast,notice in the TK video theres a long delay,before the lamp goes a very strange thing not consistent
with fakery.If we are to believe the bulb ratings of 1,000 watts,then remember my transformer is only 300 watts
it would not fit into the can,you mostlikey could power the bulbs seen in the  2004 video with modern batteries
the inverter would be gigantic and the batteries and the inverter would not fit in the can.I can make another fake simulation
that will look exactly like the 2004 video,however theres not going to be a delay in the lamps going
out when you remove the ac from the device.Now it is possible that a 50hz/60hz oscillator is in the device and as the power dies the frequency goes
up yet still powers the device,my theory is theres a feedback, modulated by the input of the
50hz/60hz inverter,there is no real 50hz/60hz oscillator.When the inverter is removed the
feedback goes out of control,this causes the delay,also a change in frequency.