Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

[jbignes5]

  I always felt that amperage is the amount of electrons moving by a point per second.   So a fast electron has the potential to move by the point say a thousand times in a second while a slow electron could only move by the point 1 time in a second.  Perhaps you know the term we use for electron velocity?  This would of course necessitate a thousand slow moving electrons to deliver the power of just one fast moving electron.  With an increase in electrons needed to deliver the same amount of power is an increase in the probablity of randomized electron acceleration not resulting in the desired electron delivery at the target.  The prime #elements are good conductors because electron pairing is in competition with the neucleus proton attraction.  This leaves a large amount of electrons in transition from atom to atom or as some have described as an electron cloud.  Accelerated electrons from the scource collide with the free electrons which transfer it's inertia through the cloud to the end of the conductor. 
   A bound electron on the other hand has to have a large amount of orbital momentum to resist the proton coulumb force.  It is these bound electrons that are a scource of inertia to be converted into energy not the electrons in the cloud.  Electrons would cease to exist without this orbital momentum.  Would not the moon have merged with the Earth eons ago if not for it's orbital momentum?  Electrons in orbitals are moving at velocities of up to 1/6 the speed of light.  Electrons powered by a 120 volt differential are moving at millimeters per second.   By my reasoning each electron going from a bound state to a free state could result in lots and lots of millimeter per second electron movement with minimal energy expenditure to create the force needed to disrupt the e field between the proton and bound electron.

Replace all terms of electrons with charges and you will understand it better.

lets also put that in no way can an electron be bound. That is one fact that the current establishment concedes. If it could be bound then it would be easily examined. Hence the reason they have never seen the electron to this day. It is simply not there.

There is only charge and potential. You need one to have the other and in order to get one to form you need the other.  Potential is the actuator of any current. If you don't have the potential there is nothing to create the movement of charges we call current.

In all of Tesla's experience one thing can be learned is that he finally made the connection to the underwater tank generator. One can create great movements of charges towards the potential. This is called corona discharge. He must have figured it out finally after his Wardenclyffe tower experiments and put together all of his learning from earlier tests with this new vision in mind. Tesla said he had a new theory of gravity and why it was what it was.

[verpies]

Perhaps you know the term we use for electron velocity? 

Fermi Velocity - see here.

Electrons are common charge carriers, but not the only ones.
Uncharged electrons in solid matter are also postulated by novel theories, but conventional physics denies their existence. Uncharged electrons outside of matter are denied by both. In other words, they must acquire charge to be capable of motion in vacuum (space).

It is important to remember that charge alone does not constitute energy anymore than a water in a bottle does by itself. However water under pressure - does constitute energy (just like charge under voltage: ½QV).

Electrons have 3 properties: mass, charge and spin.  The first two properties can be used to store/transport energy. 
Slow electrons store most of their energy as charge separations/displacements and fast electrons store most of their energy as kinetic energy of their mass.  That kinetic energy can kill living cells, and is used in focused cancer treatments.

Fast electrons interact with solid matter more weakly than slow electrons. In other words, atoms "prefer to grab" slower electrons, making the fast one more penetrative.
The range of very fast electrons (~0.7c) in solid matter, such as the ones ejected from atomic nuclei, is around millimeters.
Positrons have a slightly longer range in the same magnetic field.

[verpies]

More info about the distances that electrons and positrons travel in matter is here.

[sparks]

    It is well understood that an electron rattling around in a copper lattice can under the influence of an electric field rattle more in one direction than another.  This would leave one to the conclusion that electric currents are electrons moving more in one direction than another.  The scource of energy appears to be the kinetic energy of the rattling electrons.  Even at zero kelvin the electrons still move at the same velocity as they were at room temperature.  If this is the case an electrical current is a series of energy conversions from rattling electrons to flowing electrons along the length of the conductor in response to the imposed electric field.  Electrons amassed at one end of a conductor increases the negative charge density of that space.  The field effects associated with an increase in charge denstiy spreads out in all directions and a portion of it aligns with the load conductor.  The electrons drift away from this space more than they drift towards it.  In all cases the energy is supplied by the electron rattling and the force comes from propogation of the electric field.

[verpies]

Electrons amassed at one end of a conductor increases the negative charge density of that space.  The field effects associated with an increase in charge density spreads out in all directions

There is just one tiny weeny problem here:  We all know that negative charges repel, so why don't they all repel out from each other and eventually accumulate only at the boundaries of the conductor ?

The answer to this question is the cause of many alternative unconventional conduction theories out there.  Those theories postulate that the electrons inside conductors are uncharged but can acquire charges at their boundaries due to high voltages or temperatures or light irradiation.
Charged electrons are responsible for the, so called, static-electricity which indeed manifests charge accumulation at conductor boundaries and travels through vacuum.  Uncharged electrons cannot cross vacuum and are confined to matter.
This is the key difference between current conduction-electricity and static-electricity.