Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

[verpies]

it could be that Bessler has used this invisible curved ramp already in the 18th century within his wheel, couldn't it?

I don't know but I think that gyros worked the same way in 18th century as they do today.
It is important to remember that this invisible "corkscrew ramp" disappears the moment you stop twirling the gyro.

It is fun to think and analyze the pitch and slope of this virtual corkscrew, as a function of the twirling speed.

[verpies]

Shielding: Another possibility is that the copper strip acts like an aerial picking up the static generated by the high frequency switching.

Copper foil is effective in conducting high current and HV as well as shielding static electricity and HF magnetic fields as well as HF electric fields and HF EM.
Copper foil is ineffective in shielding static or LF magnetic fields as well as LF EM.  (50Hz is LF).

Grounded copper foil strip is an ineffective antenna. 
I'm leaving it to the "video/photo analyzers" to determine whether the copper foil strip is grounded.

[Zeitmaschine]

It is important to remember that this invisible "corkscrew ramp" disappears the moment you stop twirling the gyro.

Then don't stop it. Maybe that's why it is said that some UFO's constantly spin around.

When a mass turns with high speed within the earth's gravitational field then this field changes its direction with each degree the mass turns, so because of its inertia the mass can't decide in which direction to fall, so it does not fall at all.

His patent states that he picks up the excess energy from the air. It's all there in plain sight.

Can't remember having seen the word »shielding« in one of his patents. According to the drawings the ground is connected directly to one of the bobbins, not to a metallic shield. That's rather misleading.

So why do some transformers burn out when a solar storm comes along? The transformer (or the grid) obviously absorbs the energy in the electric field coming from the sun. Then why is this not always the case (as with the Kapanadze device) but only when a solar storm hits the grid? Is this because the electric field surrounding the (widespread) grid and its transformers during a solar storm is not uniform but one transformer could be exposed to a stronger field than all the others? So a difference between the bobbins of these transformers occurs generating (unwelcome) free energy?

Then could that mean (without a solar storm) shielding one part of the grid could also create a difference between the bobbins and thereby generating (welcome) free energy? Then what's still the problem doing it this way?

[a.king21]

Copper foil is effective in conducting high current and HV as well as shielding static electricity and HF magnetic fields as well as HF electric fields and HF EM.
Copper foil is ineffective in shielding static or LF magnetic fields as well as LF EM.  (50Hz is LF).

Grounded copper foil strip is an ineffective antenna. 
I'm leaving it to the "video/photo analyzers" to determine whether the copper foil strip is grounded.

Actually, this is a good deduction. We know from his patent that his device uses high frequency switching. Kapanadze also told me as much. We also know that his patent does not use HV. So why the HV antenna or shielding? Answer: radiant energy.
Switching voltages through an inductor causes the radiant spike effect which is HV.
One more question  scientifically answered I suspect.

[sparks]

There is just one tiny weeny problem here:  We all know that negative charges repel, so why don't they all repel out from each other and eventually accumulate only at the boundaries of the conductor ?

The answer to this question is the cause of many alternative unconventional conduction theories out there.  Those theories postulate that the electrons inside conductors are uncharged but can acquire charges at their boundaries due to high voltages or temperatures or light irradiation.
Charged electrons are responsible for the, so called, static-electricity which indeed manifests charge accumulation at conductor boundaries and travels through vacuum.  Uncharged electrons cannot cross vacuum and are confined to matter.
This is the key difference between current conduction-electricity and static-electricity.

    They do spread out in all directions.  Power companies to save capitol expenditures when running long high tension conductors use hollow cores as they have found that 90percent of the current is carried near the skin of the conductor.  This is where the free electrons end up.  The free electrons have moved  from the core of the conductor to the skin of the conductor.  Recently working with an inverter noticed that the manufacturer used foil between the mosfet bank and the transformer.  Roll foil into a tube and you have yourself a pipe.  Coil the pipe and you have yourself what alot of people use as a primary in highvoltage tesla transformers.  But was Tesla using the current going through the primary or the electric field emanating from the primary?  Any chance that he calculated the impedance on his primaries in such a manner as to insure no current flowed through them but used them more as a capacitor where we find large amounts of electrons or missing electrons amassed on metals  seperated by a non-conductive medium.  The force applied results in an intense electric field between the two capacitor conductors.  In there things aren't like they are out here.  Electric fields can reach intensities very capable of cancelling the binding efield of the electron proton.  If the bound electrons pocess any inertia within their "natural" orbitals and suddenly find themselves no longer bound to the neuclear core what is stopping them from jumping ship and moving towards the anode of the capacitor?  If as these electrons within the dielectric move towards the anode they encounter a magnetic field which slows them down (changes their mass/velocity) should we not expect a large amount of photons being released.  The rate at which they slow down will determine the wavelength of the photons radiated.  If these photons are then absorbed by a mass that serves as an antennae would there be a conversion of electron mass/velocity from within the atoms of the dielectric to electron mass/velocity within the antennae serving as a conductor?