Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

[forest]

Fine, however diode is the real problem, every electronic device is a problem indeed. While I see a value in any such setup (and I'm working on one myself) we have to find quickly a working schema without any electronic semiconductor device.....in case of grid system failure due to solar activity..

[dllabarre]

PS. looks as if it can only work with inverter, due to one side of grid is always earth so I think only one diode would then work with this set up?

I don't see where his system is tied to ground.  Which figure are you referring to?

Also, Inventor says you can use PWM instead of inverter to get pulsed DC.
DonL

[captainkt]

@dilabarre, Yes produce pulses with inverter or pwm but not good to use grid in this patent as one side of grid is earthed and if grid was used would prevent one half  from pulsing.
Regards
Keith

[Grumage]

Don't forget the Faraday cage to incorporate.

Anyway, who finds out what's actually in the Stepanov transformer boxes (Russian standard transformer as it seems)? It could be very beneficial to know the exact specifications about what's in there. How does this transformer transform when it is used the standard way? Is it step-up or step-down? Or is this an insulation transformer? With or without tapping? Are there build-in thyristors by default?

Are the two capacitors connected outside because there is no room within the box or because it will not work when those capacitors are inside the box (Faraday cage)?

But at least I don't think there is a Tesla coil inside or a spark gap or high voltage or some other fancy materials. Looks indeed very simple.

Hello Zeitmaschine,

First let me clear up a slight misunderstanding re my last post. I meant that I had put together a thought, not a device however I am now working towards a build.

Regarding the above Stepanov transformer. Am I right in thinking that there is a three phase input from the grid to this device? Because if that be the case He has just created one of those Black boxes I was writing about recently.

Cheers Grum.

[Grumage]

Well, I think you got it.... but x_name41 statement has also a merit - like Don Smith said once : you have to have energy here to see it, you have to keep 5kW in resonance to get it out. Funny enough ?

I have done various experiments proposed by Jack NoSkills and while I didn't found free energy , because I'm not EE or educated enough , I realized that something is very bad with current view of resonant circuits.
Everybody told me you cannot tap energy from resonant circuit, yet with carefully matched elements I can "simulate" OU with just one or two transformers and a load with stable resistance and no inductance.
This "simulated" OU (I call it such because it works only with very stable elements and every change in setup breaks effect) is by two resonant circuits : an isolation  transformer + capacitor (parallel resonant circuit) + 50Hz pure sinewave input source (inverter) on primary side and also parallel resonant circuit on secondary side with load (pure resistance small bulb (have to measure resistance after some time to warm filament) or just a led lamp). With careful matching you have a circuit with much less power consumption then indicated by rules.

That was first I wanted to describe to Grumage and all, but I'm not and educated EE so please bear with me. This however told me that the only reason we can't have OU is because : first we use symmetry wrongly without understanding induction laws, second and more difficult to grasp : induction laws HAVE to match Newton laws .

In case of transformer this tells me (even if you think I'm crazy) : on secondary side we have a COPY of energy stored by us in primary side, equal and opposite.

Before you dismiss this theory as impossible , think about one consequence : in such case we still have in common transformer  only COP<1 because of symmetry we use. So , if I'm correct we have our OU right before our eyes , yet using current view on induction laws is enough because we have not evolved our circuits to use better symmetry (due to misunderstanding or induction maybe).



The reactive power I talked about is always in our circuits to shake them mechanically, to heat them and to radiated RF because IT IS NOT TRANSFORMED INTO SECONDARY. It doesn't need to be (in such case where would be the reaction force ? remember.. equal and opposite....). It tries to leak out or return back to power supply even in AC systems, because everywhere are resonant circuits even created momentarily 

End of crazy talk (my english is too limited to put it simpler). I removed my posts because nobody likes to be treated as a madman...

Grumage , you mentioned your tests with transformer, can you elaborate more ?

Hello forest,

You have become a tree!!  From."where do you hide a tree? In a forest" No jibe intended, you give yourself far less credit than you deserve. This forum has such a diverse talent pool that there will be no stone left unturned. I personally feel that together we can crack this!!

You will have to remind me about transformer test's I am so consumed with present experiment's that I can't remember what I had for lunch

To all, remember this...http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r4dP1IF70a8&feature=youtu.be

Has anyone got an idea for the primary drive circuit? It looks like a 2N3055 on a heatsink. But it's the output from the secondary... Just like pure energy. White not blue. Like jbignes5 describes.
This has to be a switched DC as any AC derived supply, the ripple always seems to reflect into the Spark Gap.
Cheers Grum.