Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

Started by Pirate88179, June 27, 2009, 04:41:28 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 334 Guests are viewing this topic.

stivep

Quote from: Ganzha on April 09, 2013, 04:30:13 PM
Is it thrue - Stivep said 1,1 mgr of mixture producing 1,1 KW power?


30 milligram of Colman mixsture =1.1KW


but in Rossi reactor
1g Ni powder and hydrogen =10kW/h in thermal  power.
or 180days needs 150gr of nickel


Wesley



verpies




Farmhand

Quote from: jbignes5 on April 09, 2013, 07:56:54 AM


Wait is this not what I have been suggesting and TK is doing the whole time? Excitation of the copper to output more then it takes to cause the excitation. The gain medium is the impulse across the gap. The exciter is around a copper coil connected to a load. Wow so now that you have found a French patent that says the same thing you give credence to what I have been saying the whole time and TK has been doing.


Wow talk about bringing up the same exact method and then saying look what I thought of...

jbignes5 Who are you referring to ? Please have the decency to mention who it is you are trying to run down so that person can defend themselves.

Who found a french patent ?

Who is giving credence to what you have been saying ? Be specific, write names !

Are you the only one who has said that ?

Did you come up with the copper transmutation idea all on your own?

Who said they thought of the copper transmutation first ?

What about all the kacher circuits doing tests in this area previously.

You mention anything and everything you can think of, then want to lay claim to everything just because you mentioned it.

Many people have you on ignore so they have no idea what it is you have been rambling on about.

Get used to the word coincidence.

And if you want to be taken seriously do some experiments and post them so we can see your work.

Anyone can ramble on with their own poor interpretations of different things, mentioning so much stuff and getting most of it wrong anyway.

Just mentioning something means next to nothing. Show us the experiment.

Do you think someone is going to lay claim to having thought of the copper method first ?

If there is a patent for the copper method where is it ? Since you know all, produce it.

I couldn't care any less who thought of it first or who mentioned it when, I just want to try it, by experiment, which may be a foreign concept to you.

This is open source, get some humility.

Is there a patent or not for the copper method ? If there is would someone be so kind as to link it and translate it if necessary.

Cheers