Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

[markdansie]

@leo48
I agree fully with your observation. We should have at least a volt and amp meter so we can measure the load. The lights look a bit dim and could well be below the input power.
On the input we need a scope to measure he true input as any devices have been made that can trip meters. With a scope we can determine the true input.
Unitl then (although this is a great project to follow) we are just making assumptions.
Kind Regards
Mark

[iflewmyown]

Why should we poke at Naudin? He is under no obligation to share anything with us. Surely after all the years he has spent researching he knows that a lamp is not at full wattage unless the voltage and current are correct. If one person sues him because of their stupidity then his life is changed forever. They don't even have to win to cost him a fortune. I know. I also would like him to build a device, test it, and send it to me so that I can copy it for free. What he has shown is more than I have accomplished on my own and I am grateful.
Garry

[markdansie]

@ Gary
No one is poking fun at Naudin. He is wel respected over the world for his work. he normally does not make too many claims...others do that for him. However my comments were directed to the may here who read into things that are not there. many of us have both here and in our own experiences seen where results can be misleading to not following correct procedures when measuring devices. When itcoms to the crunch it has to stand up to the scientific method.
I am sure Naudin would be the first to close loop such a device and he may well do oneday.
We have seen many devices here over the years that appear to be overunity only to find that input or output measuring techniques were inadequate and in most cases were fooling the electronic instrumentations used.
So please do not think we are critical, we are just pointing out th obvious before too many people get carried away. Like I said its a ood projectto follow.
Kind Regards
Mark

[bolt]

Kapandze made this system using hard to find patents from Tesla books long before the Internet was born. He also managed it from scrap TV parts and nothing more then an old Avo meter and soldering iron clearly in very harsh poor conditions in Georgia.

Point I am making is stop looking for excuses OU has been around forever and reproduced thru hundreds and hundreds of patents. For those with half decent lab of scope and PSU's etc this is kids stuff.

Remember it took over 20 years before people started making Bedini toys. One bicycle wheel, some wire, few resistors, a tranny, a few magnets. Its  OU COP >3 on a good day low power toy good for a million volumes of denial thru-out the net about how it works or doesn't.

Its NOT a lack of information its a lack of will power and requires the 99 monkey syndrome before others start to try it.

I tell you this IF i made this I would NOT disclose the precise details. You know why? Because people are LAZY and i don't blame anyone for making something OU then think why the heck should i just give it away to LAZY bloodsuckers that cant be bothered to at least TRY.

It don't get much simpler to use a MOT (very dangerous better to  use NST or car coil) and a coil of wire and 2 screwdrivers stuck in the back yard.

[grizli]

Kapandze made this system using hard to find patents from Tesla books long before the Internet was born. He also managed it from scrap TV parts and nothing more then an old Avo meter and soldering iron clearly in very harsh poor conditions in Georgia.

Point I am making is stop looking for excuses OU has been around forever and reproduced thru hundreds and hundreds of patents. For those with half decent lab of scope and PSU's etc this is kids stuff.

Remember it took over 20 years before people started making Bedini toys. One bicycle wheel, some wire, few resistors, a tranny, a few magnets. Its  OU COP >3 on a good day low power toy good for a million volumes of denial thru-out the net about how it works or doesn't.

Its NOT a lack of information its a lack of will power and requires the 99 monkey syndrome before others start to try it.

I tell you this IF i made this I would NOT disclose the precise details. You know why? Because people are LAZY and i don't blame anyone for making something OU then think why the heck should i just give it away to LAZY bloodsuckers that cant be bothered to at least TRY.

It don't get much simpler to use a MOT (very dangerous better to  use NST or car coil) and a coil of wire and 2 screwdrivers stuck in the back yard.

He he if OU would be so simple we would already have OU devices in general use ...

Kapanadze made it , but many many others failed .. and still there is no prove Naudin made it ... waiting for scope images...
Naudin spent many many years making ou devices , but I am not sure has he ever made closed loop so far ? and possibly he with this KApanadze method discovered much more OU than everything else before..

SR claimed he made it and refused to give anything out ...
Naudin made HUNDREDS of possibly OU devices with FULL documentation and now when there is maybe much more OU he decided to keep data for himself..
Seems history repeats again, and again and again ...
And WILL REPEAT AGAIN if people will think like you said your post..