Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

[T-1000]

Hi T-1000

When you build cadeus type OU device, are you tried run (light) bulb under water?

regards zcsaba77

Nope but you can try build and check yourself
It is high frequency going on there and this is one of things why people can light bulbs under water without getting shocked.

[Grumage]

the attachment named '26159553-Free-Energy-estress.pdf' !!!!

Dear bringdownthezog.

A very interesting read!! I presume you have noted the similarities between this idea and the Hendershot scheme? There's probably many more too!

I think that this idea could be easily tried by many of us. I am using size A2 Lamination pouches as a dilectic for my Akula device.

Happy coiling, Grum.

[stivep]

You want Free Energy than read it

]
question from the man who will possibly be the first one showing big power out from Colman tube.


Yes he was in contact with me and he made the statement releasing me from any responsibility  of any side effects.
All comments to him  where written  in form as if I was talking   to myself.


He made  Colman the right way.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1wCPOr3RSNo


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QucsK2hg0eo




Wesley



Questions of that duplicator:

Wesley:I'm thinking that a sustainable reaction may require both the magnetic [color=rgb(27, 142, 222) !important]field[/color] and electric field (RF) cause the material or compounds neclui to become unstable, (as stated in the Colman Patent). At first reading I got the impression that the coils which produced the magnetic field (in the Colman Device) was only used as a governer to control the rate of alpha and beta emissions (as indicated in the patent) which may be the case, once the reaction is started, - but - after learning only enough to be dangerous about NMR, I believe (at this point in time, anyway) that the magnetic field may be necessary to start and or maintain the reaction. The Colman patent indicates (by the design of the magnetic coils (15) pole pieces (14)) that there is a concentration of the magnetic field at several points along the tube (13) containing the reactive compound (located between the zink and copper pouder). If I had to guess, I would say that at each one of the strongest magnetic points of the pole pieces (14) is where the reactive compound (in the glass tube (13) is located. The patent talks about multipal cells (each cell consisting of (copper powder - reactive compound - zink powder). It seems likely to me that the highest comcentration of the magnetic field would be at these locations. By using the multipal cells, it may be easier to obtain a stronger magnetic field (at multipal pin - point concentration points) rather then by using a single larger magnetic field.  The patent drawing shows the pole piece (14) having two points of magnetic concentration points, indicating to me that colman used more than one point, but could be any number over and above what is indicated in the drawing, which is typical of patents. I just finished loading a tube with two cells, making the compound locations line up with the two magnetic concentration points of the electromagnets. I used Calcium Phosphate (one atom of P) in place of Calcium Metaphosphate (two atoms of P) because thats what I have. I will start some testing soon. Just wanted to take my time with this, starting out.Question: Are we the only two people on the planet that is trying to replicate the colman device that you are aware of, or have you ran across other builders doing experments also?As Always:Many Thank yous and have a good day.

That what is below is
Wesley that is is talking to himself: v.m. F you all of SOB's





The answer is simple:
I stated  few days ago FALLOW THE COLMAN EXACTLY!!!
Do not  improvise




After  close to  half of the year of experiments with Colman
I state that  device presented by that  unknown yet to the public duplicator (who decided on his own to fallow my experience
Is the one that  is the closest to  Colman and the best way to understand and  recommended replication.


so if you want to see it working concentrate on this man  as I said I DO NOT CARE WHO IS FIRST I DEDICATED MYSELF TO  HUMANITY


So what is the secret of Colman and why Wesley got only small light bulb out out it? Well WEsley should use electromagnets but he intentionally  did not use it to see all of the interesting side effects too ........ (uch............ that was ugly experience)




The shape of the electromagnets  ot to be precise( must be) the shape as shown in the patent for  upper bracket  facing glass quartz tube.
The diameter of that CURVE AND ANGLE OF RADIUS IS CRITICAL.
THE BRAKETS  ACTS  LIKE LENSES.and is directly dependend  of thickness of leyers and orientation of sharp  ends of curve against  compound.
than brackets reflected  "energy"/ particles  when back to tube at very correct angle interact with compound

I said"energy"/ particles that is just  abbreviation - short cut
and is used for simplifying answer  only, so please do not criticize me for it




1.As result of lensing : term "kinetic ENERGY  LENSING "WILL ONLY BE  VALID IF AND ONLY  IF  TRAVELING MASS  PARTICLES ARE INVOLVED in lensing process.
this part will be than subject of magnetic lensing process. (eg. beta but not limited to beta)


2.If photons of particular region are involved in  lensing that must be due  the "massless energy" that belongs to  particular energy level and by that  represents given frequency.Term that is to be used at that point to characterise the process is no longer " lensing" but concentrator
by means:
a.the higher the energetic level of massless particle the higher energy it represents
b.elevation to  higher energy level  can be influenced by experimenter by presenting higher excitation level.
c.excitation level makes  the frequency region  massless particle belongs to manifesting its presence.
d. Primary reason of response is electromagnetic wave that  is in frequency  region of RF waves.
e. we did not established if  original Colman from 1956 based on primary  frequency of response or he hit just harmonic response
f. harmonic response is  the response of smaller magnitude as it  is far  from resonance (eg. 1st,2nd and o on   harmonics)
g.distinction of what is "primary phenomena"found in Colman   depends from power and frequency of excitation.
h. "primary  phenomena" is: alpha  beta gamma xray neutron radiation.
i. during  experiments   presence of alpha  was not  established.

Beta was present but likely:
j. Beta  ( minus)( negatron) was present and beta originates  from nucleus so is anti-neutrino
k. Beta +( plus)( positron)  was present and beta originates  from nucleus so is -neutrino
l. Gamma was present  and that is massless particle. ( gamma originated in  nucleus)
m.Neutron was present origin of neutron  or cause of neutron radiation was not established.
n. X-RAY  is PRESENT ALL THE TIME!!!!!!!

Dangers:
the most penetrating is Xray.
But origin of Xray is due to electron re positioning in shells (K,L,M,N)


=========================================================================================

Electron absorption- electron annihilation  by nucleus was not established as part  of process explanation  but kept probable.
The experiments provided are in area of
Auger spectroscopy
resolution 10nm, electron microscopy and EDXRF( kevex),
Par production,
electron scattering,
HPLC UV high performance liquid chromatography scintillation  with differential photomultipliers for matching spectra,

and so on.





End of Wesley talking to himself

Goal of Wesley:
Energy  is not  my major goal and I do not speed up to make it first.
I did most of  should  be done taking all of  side effects on myself ( if any )
What is left is simple , just experiments that's all.
What is left is left should be easy for mechanic to handle.
It is little frustrating but someone must do  "the Sheetrock work too"


the next step:


COLMAN IS NOT ONLY ENERGY BUT IS THE KEY TO ALTER - MODEL, MATTER UP TO YOUR DESIRE.
And that  by itself is much, much  much  more  than energy.


Till now  have never ask for donation:
and I got

Real donation from real scientist  that I did not ask for.
And Why   is that?
Because he believes that I'm simply 
NON CORRUPTIBLE

it is not important how smart you are but  who you are!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Wesley

[bringdownthezog]

Dear bringdownthezog.

A very interesting read!! I presume you have noted the similarities between this idea and the Hendershot scheme? There's probably many more too!

I think that this idea could be easily tried by many of us. I am using size A2 Lamination pouches as a dilectic for my Akula device.

Happy coiling, Grum.

Hi Grum C. It is a very good read.. Did you notice the math for power amplification ? !!! I'd want a good bit of bearing about  while fooling with this device.

The Hendershot device is very smart and does electrostriction as well. But this device is a proper solid state motor. Shoot, how did we miss this all this while !!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DwrnvVho_h4

There is another contrived war breaking out in the Middle East. I've written a bunch about this device and other devices at

http://realstrannik.ru/forum/39-kapanadze/108060-generatory-kapanadze-obshhaya-tema.html?start=6228

Have a look see.

Happy hacking,
BDtZ

[zcsaba77]

Nope but you can try build and check yourself
It is high frequency going on there and this is one of things why people can light bulbs under water without getting shocked.

Hi T-1000

I found something on internet:
http://www.cspenergy.eu/
One hungarian guy, patented one device named 'CSP converter/inverter', his device have unusual 50Hz output 230V, and his load exam. bulb or el. motor work under water without any problem (no shocked, no shortcut), he is explain in one report in tv (and explained in his patent), he used just copper coils, one like transformes core (almost like yours cadeus coil) and second turned on this coil (coil on coil core), but how its look these coils shape is secret, device isnt selfrunner, but output is higher than input, his device supplying from battery, but during load, his device discharge and charge back battery, and batteries usualy 'loadablity' he enlarge 10 times (he cut metal by flex and used just 2 pcs 12V 30Ah batteries, flex was 2000W)
reportage link:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rVKvFy4veok&list=HL1377702022

best regards zcsaba77