Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

[gyulasun]

This is my NE555 CMOS oscillator. You dont need dead time part, so you cut it out, and you need
mosfet driver at output, I use TC4420 for that.

Hi Karlo,

Thanks for the unrared schematic drawing you kindly uploaded here: http://www.overunity.com/7679/selfrunning-free-energy-devices-up-to-5-kw-from-tariel-kapanadze/msg373923/#msg373923 

Gyula

[GeoFusion]

  Geo:
  Maybe try to obtain more Halogen 1kw bulbs, to test for even higher output results, as it may also be possible that the batteries output drawn, may drop even further.
  Again, please show a clear close up picture of your Royer oscillator so that we can try to duplicate your results, by using the same exact components, coils and other details, where possible. Also, are your yoke cores made in Russia, or not? 
I will do my part to follow up on this, as soon as I can. 
  Sorry for all my suggestions, and thanks again for all your great contributions.
  You have been an inspiration to us all.

                                                          NickZ

Hi Nick ,

Alright, I'll make sure to get more of these 1kW halogen bulbs and put two parrallel and see differences for testings.
I'll post one more lighting a 500 Watt incandescent bulb maybe today. or maybe 2 in parallel for the test . maybe the Ciruit will pop today haha. oh well.

Yes alright close ups again  no problem , the Royer oscillator I should rebuild because I blew the last one of that particular one, small Fet's on it. IRFZ34N they are. But easy to get (= no problem.
Hmmm I remember seeing Ru on the Ferrite yoke somewhere but I tried this method with other types of Tv CRT yokes and does the same thing, but difference is coiling and dimension of Yoke for output.
Hey man  no problem at all , we need these discussions to move forward with the work and testings, Lets keep it this way.

Cheerz~
Geo

[NickZ]

  Reply to Acca:
  I'm not complaining, at all.
   The quote that you previously posted made by Akula was in reply to this post (below). I admit that I don't always understand.
  If you feel that the previous diagram is correct, by all means, don't let me keep you from replicating it. But, as far as I've heard, he has been asked about it, and made a reply that he had not put that diagram onto the Internet, at that time. 
  I really don't know, what to believe. Sorry to annoy you.
  Thank you for sharing your views.
                                                    NickZ

Alfic writes:   ......   The scheme is incorrect!  Will not work! [/ Quote]   Normalnenko so alfik - a couple of minutes collected and checked   Ah-young man   Better yet, write: "So what?"   This question is even no replies     GeoFusion:     One other suggestion, if I may...  In order to avoid fried transistors, I've learned to keep my finger on them, at first, to see how they react. If you can't touch them, it's usually only a matter of time before they go up in smoke.

[Hoppy]

  Hoppy:
  Thanks for your results and tests on the output readings of your Royer oscillator. I know how frustrating this all can be.
  However, I don't think that the actual load readings are of real concern, once we can successfully feed-back and self run these devices.  As economizing the circuit, or working towards efficiency is not the goal here. Although its hard to imagine how putting a load on a device can induce it to create 0 input from an input source, as was shown by SR 193. But, it does look like the load becomes part of the circuit, and will not work the same without it.
 

Nick:
I'm sure you are right on the efficiency front, as IMO there must almost certainly be a hitherto unknown factor responsible for self-running operation if fact self-running is possible. Its very unfortunate that we are still awaiting to see a self-running claim being subject to appropriate measurement.

[GeoFusion]

  GeoFusion: 
   One other suggestion, if I may...  In order to avoid fried transistors, I've learned to keep my finger on them, at first, to see how they react. If you can't touch them, it's usually only a matter of time before they go up in smoke.

Nickz :
Yes that is a method I've been doing alot too but thank you for letting me know it's common form how you guyz do sometimes, putting my finger on the transistors see if they are hot or not.
but the circuit which I  lit the 1kW halogen,  after many minutes don't know how much, it will get warm but the entire heatsink will first not the fets., but it's the toroid chock that gets warm till hot, depending the gauge used. but if I use a bigger gauge wire  it will pop the Fets one shot, or even if I short circuit the outputs one time, it fries the Fets too. very sensitive circuit.

Cheerz~