Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

[zcsaba77]

Exactly, this is why his devices look suspicious to me. Unless he has a big bank of smoothing caps, I would say he is running his lamp load from a DC power supply or directly from the grid. However, not knowing the actual MO of his devices, makes it difficult to be certain that the spark gap is not important but rather incorporated in such a way as to not flicker the lamps. Speculation continues round and round in circles!!

Hi Hoppy

I thing here is not about OU, but accidently demonsrated why HF current better than DC or AC LF because HF current flow on wire surface (or close to surface) and in bulb wolfram wire too, use just surface and shine like normal grid power, I curios how long time can run bulb under HF compare with grid AC or DC.

regards zcsaba77

[Сергей В.]

fish cannot feel electric shock from a lightening strike on the water?

dllabarre electric shock can't but Radiant shock for sure.

Did you heard for Электрогидравлический эффект Юткина - electrohydraulic effect of Utkin.  In essence it's a powerful Tesla Radiant Strike but under water. Using it you can crash big stones easy like a glass.

Son of the nature - small Pistol Shrimp can hit and blow-up a target at distance 1.8 meter. Imagine now that he have a size like shark for example and most powerful Sonic weapon on this planet.

That small pistol shrimp can make small bubble with 10,000 degrees in his interior. In fact he fire a small sun in the water and make micro super-nova blast explosion. Magnitude of his electrohydraulic strike is more than 200 dB. It's 10^10 times. Biggest Jet engines today make up to 120 dB. This is just for comparison.

It's a real proof of Etheric nature of effect.

[verpies]

nobody will try it  I assume. just because of lack of credibility.

I think it should and will be tried, but if it won't be then the reason will not be a lack of credibility of the source but the lack of crucial info that e.g. Hoppy was writing about.

by the way Verpies you operate incredibly good English... and elegant one.

Thanks, that was a statement that I coined in my discussion with forest and I did not want it to go to waste.
BTW: I was not "drinking" to you when writing it.  You are not the source of the "so simple you'd laugh" mind virus, are you?

[a.king21]

"It's so simple you'll laugh". I had a chat with Tariel's translator this week and reminded him of the phrase. He remembered it well lol.
The   source is Tariel Kapanadze. I merely reported what he said. So I am the public reporter of this statement.
I'm convinced  Tariel meant it.

[Zeitmaschine]

I prefer the phrase »So simple you'll laugh« over »So simple you'd laugh«, because the latter implies that we never find out so we never have something to laugh.

Just a quick thought late at night: The Modus Operandi of Linde's air liquefaction machine (mentioned by Tesla) is that the sucked in air runs in a circle till the air gets so cold that it liquefies in the collecting tank. Could that mean that an electric current (or magnetic/electric field) in the Kapanadze (Tesla) device should also run in circles till it reaches a certain voltage (field) point? If so what could be the relevance of that?