Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

[aether22]

@aether22
I have replied to your message early. Just to make sure, I have replied to you again one minute ago.
Please DO NOT offer me any money, I am happy to post everything I know FREE.I don't have any hidden information. At this moment in time what we have is not yet confirmed OU, there are a lot of adjustments to be done.
Even if I will have a working OU device I will post every detail FREE, every one should do.

I didn't get that reply.

Maybe I have not yet seen everything you have posted, but it seems to me that getting clearly reproducible results is of extreme importance.
You have 3.7 times more apparent output than apparent input, even if your output was half of what you estimate, and your input double you would still have an implausibly high efficiency of 93%!

So your achievement is pretty significant, but if others can't replicate it reliably then it's nothing new, but my guess would be that if 5 people can replicate what you have done with a reliable recipe, interest will explode and there will be hundreds of replications and then if this has any practical use there would be thousands and quickly an energy revolution would probably follow.

Also I not only don't I have full confidence that I can accurately replicate your setup yet, but I have no idea what you did to get from a few hundred watts to 1.6KW apparent output.

Pages get added to this thread pretty fast so I'm sorry if I have missed these details, if I can get them together I'll try and make it easier for others coming in late, I'll setup a webpage.

[xenomorphlabs]

@e2matrix:
The big difference between SR´s and Naudin´s set-up is that Naudin sends the HV through the coil windings while SR sends it over the ferrite core in a single layer thin wire solenoid winding to ground and the actual coil windings are being fed with the inverter signal. Also a single earth ground is used by SR/Kapandze.

After having studied the SR video for a long time, i came to the conclusion that there is 3 wires coming off the main coil, so either one end of one coil is unconnected or they are somehow interconnected.
Some people see a 4th wire entering the coil, but to me it looks like being under the glass table.

Looking at it from the perspective of displacement currents again, this looks different now.
I think that the 2 grounds used in Naudin´s device have actually been merged in SR/Kapanadze´s device. A "Y"-Connection at the center wire connection with the coil wire and the other end of the lamp.
The load (lamp) is connected to the same ground like one part of the coil.
I ran through this possibility in my head before and always thought that the current is looking for the path of least resistance which would NOT be through the load, but for some magical reason there is also current trough the load   

[aether22]

I am not preaching flaws im offering solutions. I already stated that KAPAGEN is a good platform to learn how to tune and system basics towards  OU device. Its already stated yes it works but runs too hot and makes too much noise and EMI so i post solutions for improvements.

You do realize if you run these things for too long you could be wiping out half the TV's in the neighborhood or block out local airport comms and if you do that expect the FCC to come round with a SWAT team and kick your ass. You will get a BIG fine and ALL your stuff confiscated. That is why it need refining and the sooner the better.

Why do you need to spend 300 bucks for plans its has been posted here many many times now its a coil thats all.

Sure, there are risks but you do seem to be overstating them.
I have played with precisely this kind of circuit, a cap powered by a NST discharging through a spark gap and I had none of the problems you mention except for one time running a version without a ground in the lounge a TV plugged into the same socket turned off and that was only when also adding in a rotating magnet field.

And the TV worked just fine after.

This circuit is also a variation of a Tesla Coil (or MT) and many experimenters have used them, they don't interfere a great deal.

My point being, sure. These aren't ideal, no one is claiming they are but the #1 thing is to have a lot of people faithfully replicating this and cementing the reality of getting significant OU with this device.
Only then should complex refinements that lower the odds of success be pushed, no one is proposing that this is the final stage of development, my point is that your pushes for people to do it differently should wait until there are many more cases of people successfully replicating this.

No one should be discouraged from closely replicating the current setup, once they have you are 100% correct, this is only a stepping stone but let's make sure it is a solid one others can follow first.
In fact unless you can do better right now why don'y you replicate it and then improve it and lead the way!

[aether22]

romerouk,

you should make exact copy of first working device before applying any changes and test if you can replicate effect on copy.

That would be a good idea. or at least the coil.

[romerouk]

I didn't get that reply.

Maybe I have not yet seen everything you have posted, but it seems to me that getting clearly reproducible results is of extreme importance.
You have 3.7 times more apparent output than apparent , even if your output was half of what you estimate, and your input double you would still have an implausibly high efficiency of 93%!

So your achievement is pretty significant, but if others can't replicate it reliably then it's nothing new, but my guess would be that if 5 people can replicate what you have done with a reliable recipe, interest will explode and there will be hundreds of replications and then if this has any practical use there would be thousands and quickly an energy revolution would probably follow.

Also I not only don't I have full confidence that I can accurately replicate your setup yet, but I have no idea what you did to get from a few hundred watts to 1.6KW apparent output.

Pages get added to this thread pretty fast so I'm sorry if I have missed these details, if I can get them together I'll try and make it easier for others coming in late, I'll setup a webpage.

Many of the replicators here are only coming with theories, never tried it  practically .Easy to say do this do that but my way of thinking has almost nothing to do with  these theories.
Don't try to find a logic in what I did, just do it the way I did it. My logic in the most of the projects is different than others. Most of the standard ideas about free energy are already tested many many times before me, what is the point to be part of that many who failed. Testing new ways will bring us the answer in the right direction. 1.6kw load I thing it is  in reality somewhere around 900-1000w.I will make some more videos to make it more clear.I will plug all these bulbs in series connected to the wall socket and see the brightness then I will connect them in the circuit and see the difference.I will also try to take some scope shots as Stefan suggested.
Time is a problem as I have to go to work too, sometimes I am tired and the brain needs to relax. My day to day work is stressing me enough anyway.Also I don't want to destroy my neighbours electrical equipment with the radio waves coming from the coil.I've learned how to diminish the wave a bit now, isolating the spark gap.
In the mean time if anyone is replicating the project please just start 100% with what I have stated here then try to improvise.