Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

[baroutologos]

I just spoke with Jean Louis Naudin on the phone.

He told me, that he was only using AC from the MOT.

He had only a short plstic tube, so he just wound his L1 coil
a little long with a second layer and did not care about the winding
direction, so it looked as if it were 3 coils.

He said, that it is really beneficial to have 2 ground and that they must
be 10 meters away will help with the power output, that also was reported
by user romeouk.

JL Naudin is currently building another setup with just a 12 Volt battery
and an High Voltage inverter , so using High Voltage DC with low power
as the power supply and without using the grid
as a power supply, so stay tuned for his new setup.

He says, that he is amazed, how many bulbs you can power
with this circuit.
He is not using any ferrite cores yet, but he might try later on..
His circuit is the same as the one by romeouk, but just using the
AC from the MOT and he did not care about the winding directions.

Regards, Stefan.

Good to know Naudin tries an improvement. So acording his testimonies, the two sperate, distant grounds, the plain HV AC or DC (perhaps don't even matter which of both) and a coil of thick wire connected to loads are the only requirements.
I am looking forward his new tests and results.

@Romerouk,

Hey man, did you played with the (alleged) OU setup of yours?
Have you fool-proof input readings?
Have you smoothed output and take average readings?

You should really exhaust that directions

[vrand]

This could precisely be the assumption that has caused so many not to have come across OU from the ground for the last century. What if indeed there is a minimum threshhold level of power at a certain voltage required for the ground to give up it's OU effect. Sure, very precise tuned circuits at high voltage may be able to also achieve this threshold level but in reality, that maybe like finding a needle in a hay stack which is perhaps why very few people have claimed to have done so.

An initial brute force and untuned or perhaps roughly tuned method is perhaps what is going to allow the OU ground threshold to be reached and replicated by more people then a low power precisely tuned method. Then, when the consensous of success determines that it is all very real, the engineering to reduce the threshold power levels will occur as a natural progression.

I am not encouraging anyone to risk their safety, especially if they do not feel they have the experience to work with higher voltage and power levels in a safe manner, but I am just pointing out that it maybe be a requirement to do so for a greater chance of success and don't want to see more experienced people who are capable of working with such power levels safely, discouraged from trying.

Thank you callanan for the info   

You are on to the early history of telephone and electricity where the ground plane and connections were very important.  Tesla took to great lengths that he had the proper ground system for his Wardenclyffe tower.

Wardenclyffe Power Plant
"In order to provide the requisite ground connection Tesla excavated a 120 foot deep, 10 x 12 foot wood and steel-lined shaft directly below the tower.  Using special machines at the bottom of the shaft, individual sections of steel pipe were pushed piece by piece into the Long Island subsoil.  This provided the electrical connection that would allow Tesla‘s apparatus, in his words, “to get a grip of the earth.”
http://www.teslaradio.com/pages/wardenclyffe.htm#Connection_to_Earth

Bolinas radio station KPH
Eric Dollard and the underground wires of Alexanderson power generator.
http://journal.borderlands.com/2010/radio-archæology-and-the-life-and-death-of-the-marconi-wireless-station/
http://www.american-marconi.org/index.html

TELLURIC CURRENTS
An Introduction to the Mysteries of
Ground Radio
by Gerry Vassilatos
http://www.lauralee.com/antenna2.htm

Kapanadze, JLN, Romerouk, Tesla, Marconi and many others throughout the history of radio and electricity all find that the ground connection is important. 

Regards, Mike R.

[vrand]

I am just trying to minimize costs, i need pretty long cables for 2 grounds. Then thickness will be a factor.
3 core flex mains wire would be a cost efficient solution.
I don´t think that Kapanadze used coax for his ground cables (see image), you can only see one at the spark gap, which he probably used for cost reasons like Bolt said.

xeno what wire gauge does that photo show?  00 gauge, or larger?  Also the individual wire strands gauge, looks like 28 gauge?

Sputins, over on the Energetics forum:
"Eric Dollard ( ) himself (latest posted you-tube) says that he has "24 Ground Rods into a salt-marsh connected to a massive copper bus". "Ground impedance must be one hundredth to a thousandth of an ohm".
(Because the top capacitance has nearly zero impedance, so must the ground connection have nearly zero impedance in order for the displacment current to be 'pumped' into the ground - at least that what I think he means).

He says it's useless to have a nice piece of 8-gauge wire going from your rig to ground. "You may as well have a resistor in the circuit. All effective conductors of radio frequency current must be a third wide as they are long". (Sheet copper). Also the Q-factor has to be at least twenty thousand."
http://www.energeticforum.com/renewable-energy/5392-ground-based-energy-systems.html#post85652

Thanks

[baroutologos]

Can anyone just open a special thead for theory regarding those devices and leave this one for links, diagrams and photos/videos of actuall builds?

Honestly fed up with theories.
OMG, the ratio goes 1 gram of practice toa tonne of theory here.

[vrand]

Are you pulling my bells?

I just said coax is handy for thick cabling for current only no magic skin effect!

Bolt, what size coaxial cable do you think it is?  Sure does not look like coax cable in that photo.

Thanks