Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

[grizli]

@Bolt,

Man Your sayings make no sense to me. Hundred amps at any phase (out or in with voltage) will cause any resistor to blow up. Obviously it does not happen. IF Radiant energy was RF, then we have 1000 devices by now. Not the case. Something different must consists the OU devices i guess.

@Grizly,

Perfect Tesla coils, have SAME amperage both bottom, middle and top. No variations. In reality this does not happen as the distributed capacitance of the coil leads to diminishing amperage (since it charges) while going up. That's the reason is preferable to have a large capacitance topload. To have an continuous amperage rate at all coil and furthermore a greater amperage this way.
Your calculations may be correct. I did not proof read them. Tesla in his Last resonantor Patent of electricity transfer (Magnifier) said by making this unit as described large amperage is secure in and out of the earth. And millions of horse power can develop that unit.

Power, not energy. If you put lamps at the bottom, as Tesla did, the energy is diminished and oscillations dimish consequently.
That's the reason Tesla proposed coil emerged in liquid air, to reduce losses and increase Q. If energy was produced, then why to diminish losses? (resistance further)

NO THEY DON'T if there is standing EM WAVE !!!! If you didnt get that EFFECT : 1Your TC is untuned 2 your TC is NOT good grounded 3 Your secondary L D radio and top capacitor is NOT  good matched .. etc  4 . TC must work as EXTRA coil (better standing wave effect)

I am planning to make experiment and PROVE some Tesla stuff from Colorado srings but this game is EXPENSIVE.., and I lack money , damn money ... 


THERE MUST and THERE IS be standing EM wave in the coil wire ... that has BEEN proven 1000 times from Tesla Kinride(dont know exact spelling, read his book on Electrotherapy.com )  D'Arvosal, Oudin , and many others
I really Agree her with BOLT theories, they as VERY clouse to Tesla theories and what he was saying....  But I cant stand behind that WITHOUT proving it using experiments...   only GOOD high Q TC extra will be around 200.300$ .. too much for student without income

BIG top capacity and big distributed capacity is THE WORST thing you can have: you need L:D 1:1 1:1.5 max  by mathematic calculation this gives the smallest possible top capacity needed for standing wave, you ALSO need at least double the wire diameter gap between turns and you need the THICKEST wire you can have ... puny TC experiemtnrs use 0.3-0,5 mm diameter wire that gives if you calculate skinf effect more than 100-200 ohms

what is required is perfect standing wave .. most magnetif field(current) ant the bottom and most voltage at the top ....

I made small 0,5mm TC with 4 mm gaps between t urns just for test .. with simple neon tube there CAN BE SEEN nodal points of voltage across its length .... etc
POWER is energy here becaue FREE oscilation is NOT KILLED !!! Its like GYROBALL perfect gyroball does NOT stop rotation (very low fristion loss) when you hold it firmly .. you get tremendous energy work in your hand but when you want to stop rotor with finger you can do it easily ..  if you but direct gear with 0 fristion loss to that rotor you will get VERY low energy out ..
Similar works dual stage oscilator .I am kind of sure that OU is related not to fancy theories but to simple things, if mechanical device like dual  stage pendulum can give 10 times ou...

Bottom current probably CAN be maintained together with bulbs and load just by tuning properly ..
and he did not use ANY energy ... there is NO magnet field stopping his LC oscilator attached to earth there  if hiw spark gap is prefect than his oscilation in transmitter should be maintained for ever ..  there is NO capacitive couplin g tn this experiment nor inductive between his transmitter and reciever ... 

[grizli]

The author doesn't seem to know very well Tesla, because in two places he says that Tesla was from Austria !

Tesla born place WAS than Austria-Hungarian Empire
And your link for big size image does not work

[baroutologos]

@Grizly,

You speak with so certainty... as if Free energy is a piece of cake. Ok I wait your Magnifier replication and Free  energy out of it according Tesla who did not said anything like that!

Best of luck,

@Bolt,

Hector Peres has been saying the same mumbo-jumbo for about a decade. He has proposed a million OU suggestions yet has not made any looped model at all (i have not seen a video whatsoever). Go to his YT videos and at best he shows idle AC motors  efficiency increase and not OU in any case.

@All,

Creativity is stimulated by imagination and need. Hector Peres and others by the way have invented very serious methods and setups for power efficiency that most of us would never put together. They have been so kind to share and this is super.
BUT, this does not mean you could spell out any theory you have in  your mind, without tangible proof and expect to be believed.

Yes to imagination, yes to creativity, yes to counter-mass thinking but not to BS-tology. After all, we are seeking means to improve our real lives. Not theories to believe in.

[grizli]

@Grizly,

You speak with so certainty... as if Free energy is a piece of cake. Ok I wait your Magnifier replication and Free  energy out of it according Tesla who did not said anything like that!

Best of luck,

Yes, SORRY for my  excitement haha

If course its not free. and TC magnifier will probably not gives OU device by itself but will give us some conclusions...
For me that approach is much better than making Kapagen coil that only Naudin can make and all others got NO any kind of OU effect ..

You cant disagree with me according to this : 99% of electrical OU devices ever made were TESLA BASED !! and Its logical and natural to start from  direct Tesla research.  and 90% of all people who made OU devices DID researh Tesla .. so...

[forest]

Did you ever thought  what is the reason of inefficiency in current AC system used ?
I  saw a bulb operated as a part of LC circuit at resonance and power required to light it was 10% or normal power from grid,up to the point when resistance of bulb changed he he 
Now imagine that we have one such LC circuit with stable resonance and no load.
Imagine we can spread energy from this circuit at resonance converting it into kind of radiation having unidirectional propagation path.
Wow! No len'z law anymore ! But you need another LC circuit to tap energy back into system , and not a closed loop one because it will have floating resonant frequency when load changes.So we tap Earth electrical system using Tesla radiant patent.
If you look the same can be done using HF AC radiation from first LC to the second LC (using extra coil) but here lenz's law is only diminisched by a distance ratio ("eccentric transformer"  )