Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

[xenomorphlabs]

Hello,

If Naudin has replicated correctly, Kapandze's only has a very effcient "High-Voltage Converter" for light bulbs?, however i think so that the Kapagen is a incomplete replication, because Naudin "only"  test the first part of the machine. 

So Kapanadze`s efficient "High voltage Converter" loops back to itself just because it is efficient?

Naudin has been the motivation for probably more than hundred people to build something, maybe someone finds something from there.

Separating primary and secondary and using different signals could be the next steps.

[e2matrix]

If one adds the heat of the lights and heat from the MOT to the equation I think this circuit from Naudin may still be over 100% efficient since it seems he is only using the light output to conclude what the power output is (but there is considerable heat also).

[dllabarre]

If one adds the heat of the lights and heat from the MOT to the equation I think this circuit from Naudin may still be over 100% efficient since it seems he is only using the light output to conclude what the power output is (but there is considerable heat also).

Does your replication get real hot?

I noticed my 18 x 100 watt bulbs didn't get as hot as when they are powered by Mains.  I was going to look into this more in the future.

And my MOT got hot after running off and on for an hour during the last set of tests.  Prior to that I could always put my hand on the MOT (after the circuit was powered OFF of course  ) even after it had been on for 5-10 minutes and it only felt warm.

Don

[Trastos]

Any good transformer has more than 96% of efficency.
I don't see where is the exploit to connect lamps in series on the output of a transformer with 96% efficiency instead of putting them in parallel on the input with no transformer at all and 100% efficency.   

totally agree..... but now, he have his measurements, and the comunity continue working.

take this opportunity to introduce the comunity, working for some time that "shadow" with such devices, but I've never taken as seriously as now, and hopefully be more useful for you that only two comments in the forum.

[baroutologos]

I do not know guys what you think but to me seems that of 96% efficiency per Naudin, maybe equal to 85% real efficiency.

Naudin has some nice/clever measurments techniques in some aspects but he has repeatedly reported extravagant claims that could not be verified by anyone. (carbon fusion, MEG etc)

160 watts input to 980 watts apparent (lux meter) output is really something.
1060w to 1017w does not tell me much. (if the device is fine tuned)

If a Kapanadze unit has a COP of 1000 or 5000 (say) why always the best fine tuned models common replicators make are about 0.9 ? It means that (maybe) the OU procedure is not incorporated in that scheme.