Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

Started by Pirate88179, June 27, 2009, 04:41:28 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 417 Guests are viewing this topic.

LtBolo

http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=7679.msg258569#msg258569

This other schematic is a little clearer.

It is starting to make a bunch of sense. Rather than use a magnetic field to saturate the ferrite, he is using an electric field. The inner plate and outer plate form a capacitor with the ferrite as the dielectric. The electric field causes the magnetic domains to rotate.

He uses the signal generator to create the initial current in the secondary. A small pickup coil triggers the spark, which causes parameter change at the point of peak output current, thus pushing the output current even higher.

The only thing I see that might be an issue is the solid copper plates inside and outside would tend to have very high eddy currents, which might cause a big reduction in efficiency. If those were replaced with bifilar coils, the eddy currents should be eliminated or greatly reduced.

One other improvement that might be made is in the synchronization of the two discharges. I'm not seeing how this design would allow for continuous phase control, and that could have a huge impact on the efficiency. Rather than using a coil to pick up the discharge and use that to fire the spark, it might be better to drive both side from the same signal, but use some form of variable delay line to allow more precise control of the spark.

Comments Cosmo?

desa

Quote from: LtBolo on October 20, 2010, 01:59:52 PM
http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=7679.msg258569#msg258569

This other schematic is a little clearer.

It is starting to make a bunch of sense. Rather than use a magnetic field to saturate the ferrite, he is using an electric field. The inner plate and outer plate form a capacitor with the ferrite as the dielectric. The electric field causes the magnetic domains to rotate.

He uses the signal generator to create the initial current in the secondary. A small pickup coil triggers the spark, which causes parameter change at the point of peak output current, thus pushing the output current even higher.

The only thing I see that might be an issue is the solid copper plates inside and outside would tend to have very high eddy currents, which might cause a big reduction in efficiency. If those were replaced with bifilar coils, the eddy currents should be eliminated or greatly reduced.

One other improvement that might be made is in the synchronization of the two discharges. I'm not seeing how this design would allow for continuous phase control, and that could have a huge impact on the efficiency. Rather than using a coil to pick up the discharge and use that to fire the spark, it might be better to drive both side from the same signal, but use some form of variable delay line to allow more precise control of the spark.

Comments Cosmo?
Inside lining and outside lining is copper folium.  Hope Cosmo can clarify it.

gyulasun

Quote from: desa on October 20, 2010, 02:06:49 PM
Inside lining and outside lining is copper folium.  Hope Cosmo can clarify it.

Copper foil would  make sense, eddy currents depend much on conductor thickness.

desa

Quote from: gyulasun on October 20, 2010, 02:18:53 PM
Copper foil would  make sense, eddy currents depend much on conductor thickness.
Please don’t stomp on me here I am trying to make sense of it as everyone. For what is worth I think copper is here to slow decay of the inductance in ferrite. Sharpe rise HV (domain  all lined up) followed by slowing decay (domains decaying and reorienting gradually)  . The next signal resonates against residual creating additional resonance and inductance in center coil as per “Core” sine wave explanation. Ring it twice,  Edward Leedskalnin.
David.

Shokac

Quote from: cosmoLV on September 26, 2010, 12:20:21 PM
No, no no...
tiger try this setup around three months without results - think why he not get FE from it? :)

You need start from the scratch (yourself)

The key in SR device is to magnetize and demagnetize ferrite without loses.
High voltage and high frequency make ferrite demagnetise - it makes from ferrite Black Matter who sucks all electromagnet power from wires. and in this way this is effective way to demagnetize.

by the way, all scientists in the world try to make Black Matter without results, but there it is.
SR this process call "Dead Magnetic Field"

Cosmo????????

First say NO, and now say yes??????