Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

[LtBolo]

what do you suppose the L will be in here? the *bifilar* perhaps? or load coil?

We aren't planning to drive the excitation resonantly, so I haven't thought about it. You will definitely be using a transformer to step up the HV excitation, so the secondary would likely be very high inductance, perhaps even more than you want. That could certainly be used to tune resonance, but it may be a chore. As far as bifilar, when Cosmo talks about using bifilars, I am pretty sure he is using them as the cap plate instead of a solid copper or aluminum.

[LtBolo]

This is why I mentioned "adjusting the phase".

Yes, you could adjust the excitation frequency to skew the phase and thus attenuate the output. The window for this to work is fairly narrow (based on the mechanical version) but it should work.


You seem to have a very good grasp of the problem, so you should have no problem getting it to work. Be patient though...when we were playing with the mechanical version we got it wrong more often than right. You need a good inductance change and a high Q. Get it right and...BAM!

FACT: HV changes permeability. FACT: Permeability changes will cause power production at resonance. Thus, this circuit should work. The question remaining is whether there is some loss to the HV that isn't immediately obvious, that will result in it being less than unity. Won't know till we build it, but it seems that SR and other have already proven that it works, so I am pretty confident.

[LtBolo]

I have been thinking and experimenting with the concept of pulsing a coil at low inductance and collapsing it at higher one this may be a way of getting OU in a system.

That's backwards. Raise the current at high inductance and lower the inductance...the current goes up. Doing that in reverse eats power rather than produces it.

Of course, the manipulation of a PM field is not free or even efficient. What you put is what you get from it. I have experience in MEG setups, measurements taken and can say it with confidence.

You can't get OU from manipulating a magnetic field with a magnetic field. I suspect that the MEG does work...but...the control coils have to be very high voltage and should be using an electrostatic field to manipulate the PM field...not another magnetic field. The control coil might even work best as a bifilar...but I might be more inclined to use a pair of capacitive plates on the side of the core.

Do we have any concrete evidence Ltbolo, that E-field alters the magnetic permeatability hence inductance of a coil over a ferrite core? If yes, then we are on a good way i guess.

Yes. The papers I was referencing before are about doing exactly that.

But bear in mind, that plain inductance manipulation is not enough.

I disagree. The mechanical version we built was nothing but a coil and a cap. The coil had a variable inductance by way of a rotating core piece. With nothing but a variable inductance you can make big power.

[LtBolo]

Did Teriel Kapanadze ever state that he used a ferrite core in his coils?

According to Cosmo he built versions that used a ferrite core, as well as others that did not. I have no other confirmation other than Cosmo's word, but he claims to have spoken directly with Kapanadze.

[baroutologos]

Playing with solenoid out of ferrite, i could perceive one thing.

An air coil would have its inductance increased normally by putting it to core. (naturally)

If a smaller coil is made and inserted to the solenoid ferrite core then its inductance increases but it counts only as a single turn or just as a single wire going through the hole, no matter how many turns the insterted coil is.

No to mentioned that if both coils are placed on the same ferrite core, one on it and the other through it, do not interact while working.
It seems that the top coil creates a b-flux in parallel to the solenoid whereas the inside coil creates a flux perpedicular to solenoid's axis.

Going this a bit more far, i suppose the ferrite particles could sustain same time 2 B-flux vectors perpedicular to each other.