Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

[forest]

There is a lot of information in all videos available online but unfortunately they are talking in German,Georgian languages and nobody translated them

[forest]

http://www.overunity.com/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=7679.0;attach=50091

The description of the system in the attachment doesn't contradict the laws of physics, the explanations with displacement current are conventional. Thus extra energy has to be dismissed.
If apparent excess of energy is really generated here without new physics, the reason is that there is a hidden source, and the explanations about the system must specify it otherwise they are not correct or at least not complete.

Please translate this video http://www.youtube.com//watch?v=gErefbcTz-U

IMHO if you can explain how Linde liquefy air then you can do the same with Kapanadze. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joule%E2%80%93Thomson_effect

[forest]

Can Linde process work using the same air continuously in loop until condense to fluid or need a fresh air intake on each cycle ?

[iceweller]

The Linde process takes the compressed intake air routing it to an expansion chamber  which is in contact with a heat exchanger connected to the same intake of air thus lowering it's temperature drastically (under the critical temp) so that it can liquefy. The compressed air is first cooled with a radiator exposed to ambient, then the compressed air is fed through this expansion chamber connected to an exchanger with the intake air. This loop reduces the temperature at every cycle until it drops below the critical temperature liquefying air thus dropping in the accumulator tank below. It uses the enormous heat capacity of the ambient as a stable heat exchange to drop the first temperature gradient then using the gas's properties to lower it's own temperature by expanding it rapidly. The key feauture in the process is the purification of Oxygen by a sort of fractional distillation/evaporation. It can be read in the patent here:

http://www.google.com/patents?vid=727650

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carl_von_Linde

P.S. another SR schematic proposed by delamorto can be see here:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m-fpUsgaTAg

[wattsup]

@all

What @khabe just translated is very important indeed. Thank you @khabe. It confirms what I see as a discrepancy between SR and TK. SR says there is a ferrite core but........

When you look at the long TK video at time 55:28:020 there is this guy that is holding the TK coil in his hands. In his left hand he already is holding a cellphone with his pinky and ring finger. He has his thumb on top and his is really only holding it from underneath with his middle finger. His index finger is just slightly rubbing against it but not really supporting the coil.

Why am I describing this. Well simply because during that small portion of the video were he holds the coil and then deposits it on the table next to the manuscript, one does not get any notion that the coil has any substantial weight at all. If the core was comprised of many ferrite cores, this would add substantially to the weight of the TK coil and this should be evident in how he manipulates that coil. But for all I can gather from the ease at which he is holding it, barely has his fingers holding the coil, it gives me the strong impression that there is no core in that coil at all.

As far as the TK device goes, I am inclined to believe the device was working as shown, and, I will be doing a build on that basis but not before I am totally convinced of as much of the build as possible.

One point is the spark gap section. I can see the wires going to the spark gap are single strand which is normal given the high voltage applied, if it was stranded you would have sparks in the wire itself. So what this tells me is that if any of the coils in the TK coil are connected in any way to the spark gap line and if so then the TK coil winding involved is obviously not hindering the spark and therefore I am inclined to believe that one of the TK coil windings is in fact a single strand wire. I would guess it is the first layer coil.

The wire exiting the green box (gb) on the TK coil side upper right exit is going to the TK coil. The wire going to the side of the spark gap is going into the TK coil also. Bingo for that one. There is one white wire on the same side going from the TK coil into the gb. You can see it when the guy holds the coil in his hands, they snipped that wire to free the TK coil from the gb. That's your negative to the remaining three coils that loop in some way as a virtual positive to one side of the bulbs. The other side of the bulbs goes to earth ground.

If the TK coil has four coils they would be like this.

1) One complete length winding of single strand wire for 1st layer
2) One 3/5ths length winding of 2 layers multi-strand
3) One 2/5ths length winding of 3 layers multi-strand
4) One thick output coil of 6 turns with one side connected to the positive side of the bulbs.

What I think the coil #4 is doing is two things. First it is being used like a stabilizing capacitor of very small capacitance (where a smaller amperage can "pile onto" the fatter coil to build a higher amperage) at each output impulse. Then that thick wire is also acting like a regular heating inductor but in this case with a pulsed output you do not develop heat but just provides a reset function for the coil #2. It's all inductively controlled by the coils.

Now I can make a build and do some real testing. lol

wattsup