Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

[dllabarre]

  Though I sincerely doubt the veradicity of the drawing, I have zipped the 2 relevant ones in one file FYI (one is the reconstruction of the hand drawing). I am still waiting for an answer to the real source of this paper but it appears to be fake.

Thank you for posting this.
DonL

[forest]

Hi forest,

If you don't mind I would read your thoughts on the above in bold.

thanks,  Gyula

Well,I was too fast.I'm not yet prepared to understand and explain all concept,I see only pieces.
I have to understand why there are nodes (and not just one node) in standing waves (or why there are harmonics which is the same). Did you found any adequate explanation ? Because I didn't.
Why the perfect standing wave do not stop on producing only one node ?

Maybe Tesla just measured just standing waves, but personally  I don't think so. See ,I don't say I'm right, I'm just trying to collect pros and cons.
In  case of standing wave energy transfer would be by impedance matching of receiver and would be hard to get at any location on this planet when using long waves.Also in perfect standing wave there is no net energy transfer so such wave has to be disturbed or broken to release energy IMHO.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but the amount of energy taken from such a "power line "by receiver would be different in different locations and the same apparatus would work here but not on node or near node and would require continuous adjustments.Something like RDS function in radio ?
Stationary wave or sweeping impulse would work independently on location and bouncing back to the transmitter almost untouched when there is no working receiver . Also when standing waves would be made between Tesla magnifying transmitter and antipodes then how would you explain Tesla notes on a superluminal wave around the globe ?
 

[Herger]

Tesla detected standing waves relative the earth and atmosphere.  This supported his ideas for sending power around the world.  I recall a diagram of his that showed a standing wave drawn over a magnifying transmitter.   This makes sense if there is a reflection at the ground and aerial terminals.

Kapanadze is pulsing a single coil and not sending power around the world.

[LtBolo]

Kapanadze is pulsing a single coil...

Hergerumpy, you have been a strong proponent of short sharp pulses into a relatively high resistance coil. The theory I have pushed a couple of times is dependent on absorption of energy during electron's acceleration (presumably from a quantum source), and emission of the same during rapid deceleration (presumably as a photon of some sort). Short pulses of very fast transient would do exactly that, and would not require any form of resonance. I see no problem with that, save one, and it isn't a problem as much as a design difficulty. If my thinking is right, the amount of energy absorbed is going to be a function of the energy level achieved by the electron, and to get it very high level in a single pulse will require a rather stout whack. Not a problem, just a design consideration.

If the goal is simply separating the absorption from emission in time and space...think both ends of a heat pump in the same room, rather than at different places...it seems to me that anything that will provide the requisite accel/decel and do so in such a way as to put the two events at some distance from one another, should be sufficient. Additionally, if one can do so with high Q standing waves, then one might be able to accomplish the goal with resonance at lower input power, rather than impulses.

The key of course is how fast does charge really move in a standing wave...if at all? Does it move faster in certain configurations? What is the effect of a high Q built from very low resistance, low inductance, and high capacitance...a high-current resonance...instead of the more conventional high resistance, high inductance, and low capacitance resonance that produces high voltage? I'm not entirely sure of the difference in electron drift between the two, although I have found it interesting that Lawrence Rayburn's TREC emphasized the high current variety. Significant? Perhaps.

Virtually all of the more credible devices could be explained either in terms of rapid coil banging or resonance that accelerated electrons to sufficient speed to jump energy levels...the key simply being that you have to cross that threshold (whatever that is) and then provide a mechanism to capture the emission once the electron dumps the energy.

I'm not really suggesting anything, just curious on your thoughts, and those of anybody else that would like to jump in the discussion. In the end, the excess energy must come from somewhere, and that somewhere is likely the same place that everything else in nature gets its energy from. The question is how in practice do we force at a macro level what naturally and automatically happens at the subatomic level?

[Herger]

Hergerumpy, you have been a strong proponent of short sharp pulses into a relatively high resistance coil. The theory I have pushed a couple of times is dependent on absorption of energy during electron's acceleration (presumably from a quantum source), and emission of the same during rapid deceleration (presumably as a photon of some sort). Short pulses of very fast transient would do exactly that, and would not require any form of resonance. I see no problem with that, save one, and it isn't a problem as much as a design difficulty. If my thinking is right, the amount of energy absorbed is going to be a function of the energy level achieved by the electron, and to get it very high level in a single pulse will require a rather stout whack. Not a problem, just a design consideration.

If the goal is simply separating the absorption from emission in time and space...think both ends of a heat pump in the same room, rather than at different places...it seems to me that anything that will provide the requisite accel/decel and do so in such a way as to put the two events at some distance from one another, should be sufficient. Additionally, if one can do so with high Q standing waves, then one might be able to accomplish the goal with resonance at lower input power, rather than impulses.

The key of course is how fast does charge really move in a standing wave...if at all? Does it move faster in certain configurations? What is the effect of a high Q built from very low resistance, low inductance, and high capacitance...a high-current resonance...instead of the more conventional high resistance, high inductance, and low capacitance resonance that produces high voltage? I'm not entirely sure of the difference in electron drift between the two, although I have found it interesting that Lawrence Rayburn's TREC emphasized the high current variety. Significant? Perhaps.

Virtually all of the more credible devices could be explained either in terms of rapid coil banging or resonance that accelerated electrons to sufficient speed to jump energy levels...the key simply being that you have to cross that threshold (whatever that is) and then provide a mechanism to capture the emission once the electron dumps the energy.

I'm not really suggesting anything, just curious on your thoughts, and those of anybody else that would like to jump in the discussion. In the end, the excess energy must come from somewhere, and that somewhere is likely the same place that everything else in nature gets its energy from. The question is how in practice do we force at a macro level what naturally and automatically happens at the subatomic level?

Let me save you years of searching, the energy comes right out of space.  You could say that it is multipaction of space.  You force the macro by making it real, making it manifest itself, and pulsing your coil happens to do that. 

Standing waves, resonance, and acceleration/deceleration are all just other interesting things.  If you want the truth, then forget all of the crap that everyone else preaches and boasts about.  Pulse a coil of wire and look for an effect that appears as a radial current around the coil.  You will only find the answers on your bench.  They are not in literature.  Tesla never explained what occurs in fine detail, only the effects of it.  Grey, Sweet, Moray, Mark, Hendershot, Kapanadze: none of them explain the mechanism.  Dollard did try, and he does show the effects.

Coil, bench, or stop wasting time.