Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

[core]

I won't get into a debate about refrigeration systems. It doesn't really matter and doesn't change my point that you can mechanically induce a phase change for less energy than the phase change will yield/absorb. The role that ambient pressure plays is simply a function of your default state and starting point. Evaporation, dew point, and such just further complicates the discussion and isn't really relevant to my point.

Feel free to try and approach extraction of electrical energy from the ambient state, but you will be alone. None of the devices that are purported to work start with stationary electrons, and while electrons may be spinning like crazy in place, the drift velocities are functionally zero. The use of caps, spark gaps, and fast transients is almost universally about making them go fast. Why? I think my theory answers that nicely.

Again, how does an X-ray tube work, and at what point does a similar condition exist in a resonant or pulsed transient system?

Whatever, I try being respectful but it appears to never work. It appears that every time someone brings up an opposing theory your only response is 'Go ahead and build it'. Well here you are talking about your theory for weeks now, and making a feeble attempt to link it to the refrigeration process. If you feel so strongly about it then 'Go ahead and build it' and stop repeating yourself.

  It's not important to know how an x-ray tube works. It's more important to understand basic evaporation and condensation. BTW back some time in September is when I started to make comparisons between FE and the refrigeration process I'm sure you are aware of that. Odd how you try to 'pimp' your refrigeration theory as original.   

[Herger]

The accelerated loop is quite obvious  but hey, I'll make a red line for the really smart or humor challenged  people. Compression / decompression "is but the illusion". Electrons get  flung off he coil through centrifugal force and that is how it digs  Tesla's well of lower energy. Use silver wire like Edwin Gray for best  results.

Looks like Kapanadzi even used some silver or tin  plating on that tubular coil of his. It is an accelerator coil and  anybody that can't see that or would try and obfuscate that simple fact  should be placed on ignore or bitch slapped.

Somebody bitch-slap this guy.  Only a US-GOV disinfo agent would suggest silvered wire.

380 pages of stuff that has been discussed to death in other thread for years on various forums.  A big coil of wire, a HV DC supply, and magnetically quenched spark gap (also make it like the point-plane diode type) or other suitable switch and we would have 300 pages of eureka!

[quarktoo]

Somebody bitch-slap this guy.  Only a US-GOV disinfo agent would suggest silvered wire.

380 pages of stuff that has been discussed to death in other thread for years on various forums.  A big coil of wire, a HV DC supply, and magnetically quenched spark gap (also make it like the point-plane diode type) or other suitable switch and we would have 300 pages of eureka!

Grumpy AKA Herger is freaking out because it is true about the silver wire..


Here is a silver coated ping pong ball in a macro cyclotron accelerator. How cute!  Here were Grumpy's last words before the thread was locked, split and the post deleted in 3 minutes flat. Don't think this web site is a spook trap? Ha!


Grumpy's (Now Herger) last words were:

"You are correct that I am an "agent" of  sorts, gathering intel.  I am quite good at it.  Alphabet soup may not  taste good, but it pays well.  Smears are to goad you into spilling the  beans, which you don't have.  I have been trying for two year to figure  out who clued you in on the energy to mass conversion.  It is obvious  that they only gave you the general idea as you do not have the rest of  it.  This case in inconclusive but deemed "unimportant".  So, you are  "correct", but without the rest of it, you have a long way to go.  In  the slim chance that you figured this out on your own: Kudos!

We have info leaks all the time.  It like a big game really.  Let a  little out, see what happens.  Mix a little truth with fiction.  All  sorts of methods.  The Zionist stuff is by far the funniest yet.  People  look for patterns and similarities.  Throw in a little meat and "BAM!"  they fill in the blanks as fast as they can.  It's hillarious.  You are,  by far, our best tool.  Man! You are like our own "puppet on a  string".  Dance Puppet! Dance!

My comments about "no OU" and a "more efficeint means of induction" are  absolutely correct.  Anyone biting on that would become and immediate  interest.  No one here bit.

Oh, And Chet, we have disclosed the "secrets", just not in a detailed or  even compiled form.  It's part of the protocol to see who knows what.

Well, it's been fun gents.,."

[quarktoo]

Hey Chetty,

Apparently Herger didn't disclose the secret to an anti-static bag full of transistors.

Where's my star pig farmer! Get my star!

[LtBolo]

Whatever, I try being respectful but it appears to never work. It appears that every time someone brings up an opposing theory your only response is 'Go ahead and build it'. Well here you are talking about your theory for weeks now, and making a feeble attempt to link it to the refrigeration process. If you feel so strongly about it then 'Go ahead and build it' and stop repeating yourself.

  It's not important to know how an x-ray tube works. It's more important to understand basic evaporation and condensation. BTW back some time in September is when I started to make comparisons between FE and the refrigeration process I'm sure you are aware of that. Odd how you try to 'pimp' your refrigeration theory as original.

Well, this thread has taken a turn to the macabre lately.

Apology sir. I did not intend for my response to be adversarial. I was late for a school thing and didn't take the requisite care in editing out the edges. That's made worse by the spy vs spy vibe going here, which has made me a little quicker to aggressively defend my thoughts. I don't know what motivates others here, but I treat this as a peer review process. If I can't defend my position, I have failed the process.

FWIW, I do feel strongly about it, and we will be building 'it'. The only real problem is that I haven't been sure of what 'it' was until the last week or so, and I'm still not completely sure of all of the details.

Regardless, given the weird turn this thread has taken, perhaps it is time to unsubscribe...