Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

[dllabarre]

Hehe... nice.

In regard to this, Buzz claimed that is possible to have a non inductive transformer yet able to pass power from a wire to next to it being not reflected to the source? I have no little knowledge tot that. Can he elaborate what he meant by that? (the post was a bit messy in technical or replication terms)

TheBuzz: Correct me if I'm wrong. Preferably with a slap on the hand and not a lightening strike 


Bart:

I think he was referring to this:
http://www.semelab.com/rf/documents/Push-Pull%20Circuits%20and%20Wideband%20Transformers.pdf

DonL

[dole]

Can you report any more data about TC

No problem, I use copper tub or/and twisted copper cable as a primary and an insulated
or bare copper wire as the secondary wound on a ferrite core tube of rings
or a paper tube.
But it will be more correct to take this from original text:

“by the proper design of a comparatively small and compact transformer. In carrying on tests
with a secondary in the form of a flat spiral, as illustrated in my patents, the absence of streamers surprised me,
and it was not long before I discovered that this was due to the position of the turns and their mutual action.
Profiting from this observation I resorted to the use of a high tension conductor with turns of considerable diameter
sufficiently separated to keep down the distributed capacity, while at the same time preventing
undue accumulation of the charge at any point.”

And then I use water/oil homemade leyden jar and lately Doorknob capacitors but
I must admit that I am back to the leyden jar since I can make small adjust in capacity to.
For those further interested I will copy this to, from the original writings:

"I have been asked by the ELECTRICAL EXPERIMENTER to be quite explicit on this subject so
that my young friends among the readers of the magazine will clearly understand the construction
and operation of my "Magnifying Transmitter" and the purposes for which it is intended. Well,
then, in the first place, it is a resonant transformer with a secondary in which the parts, charged to
a high potential, are of considerable area and arranged in space along ideal enveloping surfaces
of very large radii of curvature, and at proper distances from one another thereby insuring a small
electric surface density everywhere so that no leak can occur even if the conductor is bare. It is
suitable for any frequency, from a few to many thousands of cycles per second, and can be used
in the production of currents of tremendous volume and moderate pressure, or of smaller
amperage and immense electromotive force. The maximum electric tension is merely dependent
on the curvature of the surfaces on which the charged elements are situated and the area of the
latter."

So when this is understood, it become clearly obvious, that principally any combination is possible.

d.

[forest]

Dole

But I think you are not using spark gap at secondary side of circuit as printed in Tesla schematic.Right ?

[dole]

Eh, I intended to say that but I already “stepped over my knowledge”, yes,
-> you may use condenser instead of spark gap, but you will still need this to ground <- Sorry this refers to primary sg,
Secondary, no sparks, it must be trapped inside secondary as much as possible, but
coincidently there is already answered below :^) and no needs for many turns there but rather geometry.


d.

[stivep]

Quote from:
http://www.cheniere.org/misc/ferroelectric.htm

"Now why would anyone wish to purchase a supposedly nonlinear capacitor for its very nonlinearity, and instead purchase one that has been altered to behave just as linearly as possible? Why would a company advertise such a nonlinear capacitor, then sell you one that is highly linearized? And considering the rather substantial literature on nonlinear capacitors with square S-curves, why do not the capacitor companies sell such?

We eventually found there is indeed a U.S. manufacturer of ferroelectric capacitors with precisely that S-curve hysteresis loop.  There was just one little problem.  They had an agreement with the U.S. Navy for all their production of those capacitors, and in that agreement they were not to sell any to private persons or companies.

Now why would the U.S. Navy wish to restrict a perfectly unclassified, open component from being sold on the open commercial market? Zounds! If one were a conspiracy buff, one might even try to connect this with the U.S. Navy's long suppression of the Kron negative resistor.  Do you suppose there could actually be some kind of connection between the two? Why of course not! Paranoia and all that, you know.  And still one wonders……

The literature continues to publish tests of just such ferroelectric capacitors, etc. Contacting several of the researchers who author those papers, we found that they (at least the ones contacted) were all making their own ferroelectric capacitors if they wished one with that square S-curve! No one seemed to know where we could just purchase one off the shelf.

Maybe all that is just coincidence.  And maybe not."


Please find more about construction of mentioned  device as it  looks like was principal determination of SR.

As TK the ferromagnetic core is NOT USED!! but... "Principia" of coil capacitor is maintained


Please also read section
quote:"A Possible Interpretation"

Wesley